Search

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different reperfusion strategies on neurological outcomes in patients with pulmonary embolism who received venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This was a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted in 36 institutions in Japan over six years. We included patients who underwent VA-ECMO and were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism caused by OHCA. Neurological outcomes were evaluated on the basis of the cerebral performance category at hospital discharge. We also assessed the association between reperfusion strategies and successful separation from ECMO. Among the 78 included patients, approximately half were successfully weaned from ECMO. Hospital mortality and favorable neurological outcomes at hospital discharge were 60.3% and 17.9%, respectively. Thirty-one patients (39.7%) underwent reperfusion strategies after ECMO, including 13 who received systemic thrombolytic therapy and 18 who underwent mechanical reperfusion strategy. After adjusting for prespecified covariates using the competing risk model, reperfusion strategies increased ECMO separation rate (systemic thrombolytic therapy: subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–4.17, P = 0.011; mechanical reperfusion strategy: sHR 1.70, 95% CI 0.86–3.41, P = 0.129) compared with anticoagulation therapy alone, whereas higher cardiac Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score decreased ECMO separation rate (sHR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67–0.97, P = 0.020). Favorable neurological outcomes were observed in less than 20% of patients with OHCA due to pulmonary embolism undergoing ECMO. Reperfusion strategies may be associated with shorter ECMO durations in these patients. https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr%5fe/ctr%5fview.cgi?recptno =R000041577 (unique identifier: UMIN000036490). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to describe the characteristics of cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with an initial asystole rhythm in which extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) was introduced and discuss the clinical indications for ECPR in such patients. This was a secondary analysis of the SAVE-J II study, a retrospective, multicentre, registry study involving 36 participating institutions in Japan. Patients with an initial asystole rhythm were selected. Favourable neurological outcomes (cerebral performance categories 1–2) constituted the primary outcome. In total, 202 patients met the inclusion criteria, with favourable neurological outcomes at hospital discharge in 12 patients (5.9%). Causes of cardiac arrest with favourable neurological outcomes were hypothermia (7 cases), acute coronary syndrome (2 cases), arrhythmia (2 cases), and pulmonary embolism (1 case). Among patients with non-hypothermia (temperature ≥32 °C) on hospital arrival with the cardiac rhythm of asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA) on arrival, all 107 patients (66 asystole, 41 PEA) who lacked one or more of the requirements (witness; bystander CPR; signs of life or pupil < 5 mm) had unfavourable neurological outcomes. All 5 cases with favourable neurological outcomes, except for 1 case with a short duration of no-flow time that was highly suspected based on the patient's history, met all the requirements on hospital arrival. A total of 202 ECPR cases with an initial asystole rhythm, including 12 patients with favourable neurological outcomes, were described. Even if the initial cardiac rhythm is asystole, ECPR could be considered if certain conditions are met. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]