Search

Introduction: The current guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) stipulate that an intraosseous access should be placed if establishing a peripheral venous access for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) would involve delays. The aim of this study was therefore to compare a manual intraosseous infusion technique (MAN-IO) and a semi-automatic intraosseous infusion system (EZ-IO) using adult human cadavers as a model., Materials and Methods: After receiving verbal instruction and giving their written informed consent, the participants of the study were randomized into two groups (group I: MAN-IO, and group II: EZ-IO). In addition to the demographic data, the following were evaluated: (1) Number of attempts required to successfully place the infusion, (2) Insertion time, (3) Occurrence of technical complications and (4) User friendliness., Results: Evaluation protocols from 84 study participants could be evaluated (MAN-IO: n=39 vs. EZ-IO: n=45). No significant differences were seen in the study participants' characteristics. Insertion times (MW+/-S.D.) of the respective successful attempts were comparable (MAN-IO: 33+/-28s vs. EZ-IO: 32+/-11s). When using the EZ-IO, the access was successfully established significantly more often on the first attempt (MAN-IO: 79.5% vs. EZ-IO: 97.8%; p<0.01). The EZ-IO was also found to have more advantages in terms of technical complications (MAN-IO: 15.4% vs. EZ-IO: 0.0%; p<0.01) and user friendliness (school grading system: MAN-IO: 1.9+/-0.7 vs. EZ-IO: 1.2+/-0.4; p<0.01)., Conclusions: In an adult human cadaver model, the semi-automatic system was proven to be more effective. The EZ-IO gave more successful results, was associated with fewer technical complications, and is user friendlier.

Introduction: Successful management of emergency patients with multiple trauma in the hospital resuscitation room depends on the immediate diagnosis and rapid treatment of the most life-threatening injuries. In order to reduce the time spent in the resuscitation room, an in-hospital algorithm was developed in an interdisciplinary team approach with respect to local structures. The aim of the study was to analyse whether this algorithm affects the interval between hospital admission and the completion of diagnostic procedures and the start of life-saving interventions. Moreover, in-hospital mortality was investigated before and after the algorithm was introduced., Material and Methods: In this prospective study, all consecutive trauma patients in the resuscitation room were investigated before (group I, 01/04-10/04) and after (group II, 01/05-11/05) introduction of the algorithm. The times between hospital admission and the end of the diagnostic procedures (ultrasound [sono], chest X-ray [CF], and cranial computed tomography [CCT]), and between hospital admission and the start of life-saving interventions were registered and in-hospital mortality analysed., Results: In the study period, 170 patients in group I and 199 patients in group II were investigated. Injury severity score (ISS) were comparable between the two groups. The intervals between admission and completion of diagnostic procedures were significantly lower after the algorithm was introduced (mean+/-S.D.): sono (11 +/- 10 min versus 7 +/- 6 min, p < 0.05), CF (21 +/- 12 min versus 12 +/- 9 min, p < 0.01), and CCT (55 +/- 27 min versus 32 +/- 14 min, p < 0.01). Moreover, the interval to the start of life-saving interventions was significantly shorter (126 +/- 90 min versus 51 +/- 20 min, p < 0.01). After introducing the algorithm, in-hospital mortality was reduced significantly from 33.3% to 16.7% (p < 0.05) in the most severely injured patients (ISS>or=25)., Conclusion: The introduction of an algorithm for early management of emergency patients significantly reduced the time spent in the resuscitation room. The periods to completion of sono, CF, and CCT, respectively, and the start of life-saving interventions were significantly shorter after introduction of the algorithm. Moreover, introduction of the algorithm reduced mortality in the most severely injured patients. Although further investigations are needed to evaluate the effects of the Heidelberg treatment algorithm in terms of outcome and mortality, the time reduction in the resuscitation room seems to be beneficial.

Aim: An effective airway management is pivotal for treating hypoxia and to ensure reoxygenation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This matched-pair analysis from the German Resuscitation Registry (GRR) investigates the outcomes of various methods of airway management used on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients.Methods: 89,220 OHCA patients were reported between 01/01/2007 and 12/31/2017. After applying exclusion and inclusion criteria, the resulting 19,196 patient's data were analyzed. Endpoints were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), hospital admission, 24-h survival, hospital discharge, and discharge with cerebral performance categories 1,2 (CPC1,2). Three categories of airway management were defined: endotracheal tube ("ETT"), laryngeal tube ("LT_only"), and laryngeal to endotracheal tube exchange ("LTEX"). The groups were matched with respect to age, gender, aetiology or location of OHCA, witnessing or CPR by lay people, initial rhythm, and use of epinephrine and amiodarone.Results: "ETT" versus "LT_only" was associated with higher short- and long-term outcome rates and better neurological recovery (CPC_1.2: 7.7 vs. 5.8%, OR = 1.35, 95%-CI = 1.09-1.67, n = 5552). "LTEX" versus "LT_only" showed significantly higher ROSC- and 24-h survival rate (33.7 vs. 21.8%, OR = 1.82, 95%-CI = 1.51-2.2, n = 2302). "LTEX" versus "ETT" revealed significantly higher ROSC- and 24-h survival rate (34.6 vs. 30.4%, OR = 1.21, 95%-CI = 1.03-1.42, n = 2608).Conclusion: "ETT" was associated with higher survival rates and better neurological outcomes in comparison to "LT_only". The strategy of "LTEX" versus "LT_only" or "ETT" was only associated with better short-term outcomes. Our observational registry data suggests that endotracheal intubation by physician staffed EMS is the optimal airway strategy for OHCA in our system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sudden cardiac arrest is a relevant problem with a significant number of deaths in Europe.Aim: Using data from the German Resuscitation Register (GRR), we examined changes in epidemiology and therapeutic interventions over a 15-year period in order to identify key factors contributing to favourable outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients.Methods: GRR data were analysed in 5-year periods (2006-2010 vs 2011-2015 vs 2016-2020) representing changes in the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines. Group comparison of OHCA patients was made for epidemiological and resuscitation-associated factors. Endpoints included 30-day survival and hospital discharge with a good neurological outcome (CPC 1,2). Matched-pair analysis compared outcomes, and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis identified variables with effects on survival.Results: A total of 42,997 GRR patients were studied (2006-2010: n = 3,471, 2011-2015: n = 16,122, 2016-2020: n = 23,404). Proportion of patients over 80 years, use of intraosseous (IO) access and supraglottic airway devices, rate of bystander CPR, and the proportion of telephone CPR increased over the study period. The 30-day survival, and hospital discharge rates with CPC1/2 were unchanged. After adjusting cohorts using matched pairs, a higher CPC1,2 rate was observed (8.8 vs 10.2%, p < 0.03). Logistic regression analysis showed that IO and SAD had an unfavourable impact on outcome.Conclusion: Despite a significant increase in bystander and telephone CPR rates, no improvement in 30-day survival and hospital discharge rate with CPC1,2 was observed. Initial rhythm (VF/VT), cardiac and hypoxic cause of CA, bystander CPR and IV access were identified as factors associated with a favourable neurological outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]