Search

Background. Previously, 24-week results of phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical study (SOLAR) of levilimab in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) proved a superiority of levilimab over placebo. Here we present 1-year efficacy and safety data of the SOLAR study.Objective – to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levilimab in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in subjects with MTX resistant active RA.Methods. The study was conducted at 21 clinical sites in Russia and Belarus. All randomized subjects have completed the study between November 2019 and October 2021.154 adults, aged ≥18 years with confirmed diagnosis of RA were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either levilimab (162 mg, SC, QW) + MTX (n=102) or placebo + MTX (n=52).After W24 of the study all subjects continued to receive open label levilimab. Subjects who have achieved DAS28-CRP≤2.6 at W24 were switched to maintenance (Q2W) regimen of levilimab at W28 (LVL QW/Q2W and PBO/LVL Q2W arms). Those with DAS28-CRP>2.6 at W28 continued with QW regimen (LVL QW and PBO/LVL QW arm). The PBO/LVL Q2W arm contained only one subject, thus not included in the analysis. The efficacy analysis was done in a population of all randomized subjects. Those with missing data due to study discontinuation or rescue therapy prescription were considered non-responders. Otherwise, the analysis was performed on complete cases.Safety was assessed through monitoring of adverse events (AEs) in a population of those, who received at least on dose of LVL (n=152).Results. Better response to treatment was observed in LVL QW/Q2W as it composed of those who reach DAS28-CRP≤2.6 at W24. At this time point 15/27 (55.6%) of them achieved ACR70; 23/27 (85.2%) achieved DAS28-CRP remission (Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen positive (7.2%) and injection site reactions (5.9%). No deaths were occurred.Conclusions. Open label period confirmed the lasting efficacy and safety of levilimab in combination with MTX in subjects with MTX resistant active RA and suggested the possibility of switching to maintenance (Q2W) regimen in those who achieved remission of RA at week 24.

The paper presents the results of a double-blind (BCD-085-3/AILAS) phase II clinical trial of the original interleukin 17A (IL17A) inhibitor BCD-085 prescribed at different doses to patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and those of an extended (BCD-085-3ext/AILAS-II) trial characterizing the efficacy and safety of this drug when used for a year. The objective of the AILAS study is to determine the therapeutically effective and safe dose of BCD-085 in the treatment of active AS. The efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of BCD-085 during its annual use were additionally evaluated in the extended trial. Subjects and methods . The investigation enrolled 89 patients diagnosed as having active (BASDAI scores >4.0; mean spinal pain scores >4.0) AS that met the 1984 New York classification criteria. After the end of the screening period, the patients were randomized at a ratio of 1:1:1:1 in one of four groups that received 40; 80 or 120 mg of BCD-085 subcutaneously or placebo on day 1 of weeks 0, 1, 2 and then once every two weeks up to week 12. The primary end point was the number of patients who achieved an ASAS20 response at week 16. The investigation evaluated the safety of the drug, by calculating the total incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) and the number of cases of premature therapy termination because of AEs. Results and discussion . An ASAS20 response at week 16 was achieved in 72.7% of patients receiving 40 mg of BCD-085, in 81.8% of those receiving 80 mg, in 90.9% of those receiving 120 mg, and in 42.9% of cases in the placebo group (p=0.004). The superiority of BCD-085 over placebo was proven for 80- and 120-mg doses. The fastest and most pronounced effect was observed in patients treated with 120 mg of BCD-085. In the extended study, an ASAS20 response at week 52 was recorded in 86.4% of patients. One or more AEs during the first 16 weeks of therapy were reported in 11 (50.0%) patients of the 40-mg group; in 6 (27.3%) of the 80 mg group; in 4 (18.2%) of the 120 mg group and in 7 (31.8%) of the placebo group (p=0.183). The frequency and spectrum of AEs did not significantly differ in patients who received placebo and BCD-085 in different doses. No SAE was recorded. Conclusion. Phase II study yielded data demonstrating the high efficacy and good tolerance of BCD-085 in the treatment of active AS. The best effect and optimal tolerance were demonstrated for a dose of 120 mg.

The paper gives data on the clinical efficiency and safety profile of long-term use of the infliximab (INF) biosimilar BCD-055 versus the reference drug Remicade® (REM) in a population of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).Subjects and methods. An international multicenter randomized double-blind Phase III clinical trial was conducted in 199 patients who were randomized into two groups in a 2:1 ratio and who received BCD-055 or REM at a dose of 5 mg/kg at 0, 2, and 6 weeks, then every 8 weeks. Efficiency assessment was made at 14, 30 and 54 weeks in patients who received at least one dose of INF [intent-to-treat (ITT)], as well as at 54 weeks in those who completed the study according to the Protocol (PP) (per protocol). The efficiency endpoints were the proportion of patients who had achieved ASAS20/ASAS40 responses; changes in BASDAI, BASMI, BASFI, MASES, and SF-36 scores. Immunogenicity was assessed by the proportion of patients in each group with identified binding and neutralizing antibodies (BAbs and NAbs) against INF. The safety analysis included the overall rate of adverse events (AEs), including those that met the respective criteria for serous AEs (SAEs), and grade 3–4 toxicity, as well as the number of cases of early termination of the study because of AEs and SAEs.Results and discussion. The ITT population included 199 patients and the PP one consisted of 161 people. The groups were not statistically different in the rate of and reasons for patient withdrawal from the study. A comparable number of patients achieved ASAS20/ASAS40 responses at 14, 30, 54 weeks (р ≥ 0.05). At 54 week, the proportion of patients who received BCD-055 and REM therapy and achieved an ASAS20 response was 67.42 and 52.24% in the ITT population (p = 0.053) and 80.91 and 68.63% in the PP population (p = 0.128). The BCD-055 and drug comparison groups achieved an ASAS40 response in 53.03 and 38.81% in the ITT population (p = 0.081) and in 63.64 and 50.98% in the PP one (p = 0.177). The proportion of persons with identified BAbs and NAbs was comparable: 21.26 and 3.15% in the BCD-055 group (p = 0.920) and 20.63 and 6.35% in the group REM (p = 0.443), respectively. It was found that the presence of NAbs did not affect the therapeutic response. Both groups did not differ in the detection rate and profile of AEs and SAEs or in the rate of patient withdrawal due to AEs. Most identified AEs were mild to moderate.Conclusion. The efficacy of the INF biosimilar BCD-055 used long in patients with AS did not significantly differ from that of the original drug REM; the safety profile of both drugs was comparable.