Search

One of the disciplines that has been studied in recent years under the umbrella of lexical semantics is terminology. This paper investigates the terminology of a specialised language, that of the leather industry, in order to analyse the observable conceptual relationships. The paper first reviews different approaches to the terminological typologization of the conceptual relationships with regard to examples from our corpus. The second part consists of a case study on the term petaquero. Finally, I suggest a typology of the conceptual relations according to the classification suggested by Casas Gómez, adding some relations identified on the basis of the Communicative Theory of Terminology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this paper is to highlight that both neology and terminology are linguistic disciplines that permit, using both general and specialized words, an analysis of the cultural, scientific, economic, political and ideological evolution of a given society throughout its history. For this purpose, it is crucial to distinguish the speaker's perspective from that of the hearer, especially when tackling the pragmatic and discursive implications of terminological neologisms. Both neology and terminology need to be investigated in an interdisciplinary way as new topics of lexical semantics. The goal is to formally, semantically and functionally describe the lexical units that take new functions and meanings according to the context. These lexical units are thereby subject to variation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the following paper we propose to clarify, from a terminological point of view, certain aspects of the limits established within the set of investigations and studies included in what we call text and discourse linguistics, that is, text linguistics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, etc. For this purpose, we have confronted several of the most important contributions to text theory, mainly during the 1970's and 1980's, provided that this is the period in which foundations are laid for text and discourse theories, and also the 1990's, with definitions found in various dictionaries of linguistic terminology, specially those pertaining to its object of study, i. e. text or discourse. Said definitions have been established following the developments in these fields of research. Close observation and analysis of such definitions reveal the evident difficulties encountered by researchers when applying these concepts and using this specialised terminology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]