Search

Background: In this study we assessed the accuracy of IgG serology and other tests in confirming Helicobacter pylori eradication. Methods: The outcome of anti-H. pylori therapy was established by at least two of the following tests: rapid urease test (RUT), culture, [sup 14]C urea breath test (non-capsule or capsule UBT), and IgG serology (Orion Diagnostica Pyloriset New EIA-G). Results: Successful H. pylori eradication was confirmed in 698 of 794 patients (88%). The percentage decrease in IgG antibody titre was related to the patients' pre-treatment IgG titre and time interval after treatment. A decrease in IgG titres of 40% or more confirmed H. pylori eradication with 100% specificity, whereas the sensitivity was 82%, 90%, 98%, and 98% 3, 4, 5, and 6 months after therapy, respectively. The 40% cut-off confirmed eradication 3 to 6 months after therapy in 328 of 339 patients (97%) with pre-treatment IgG titres of >700, in 36 of 45 patients (80%) with pre-treatment titres of 300-700, and in 5 of 12 patients (42%) with pre-treatment titres of <300. The sensitivity and specificity of the other tests 2 months after treatment were as follows: RUT, 84% and 100%; culture, 88% and 100%; non-capsule UBT, 100% and 89%; and capsule UBT, 100% and 97%. Conclusion: A decrease in IgG antibody titre of 40% or more 3 to 6 months after therapy and the capsule [sup 14]C UBT at the 2-month follow-up were both highly accurate in confirming H. pylori eradication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In this study we compared the accuracy of seven diagnostic tests in diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection. Methods: Over 1 year 351 consecutive dyspeptic patients were tested for H. pylori infection by means of antral biopsy specimens for the rapid urease test (RUT), culture, microscopy (acridine stain), and the laboratory urease test (LUT) and, in addition, with C urea breath test (UBT), IgG serology, and IgA serology (Orion Diagnostica Pyloriset New EIA-G and New EIA-A). The criterion for H. pylori infection was a minimum of three positive tests. Before being tested, 38% of the patients had used an H-receptor antagonist (HRA). Results: Two-hundred and twenty-four patients (64%) were H. pylori-positive. The sensitivity and specificity of the tests were as follows (percentages): RUT, 85, 99; culture, 93, 100; microscopy, 81, 98; LUT, 80, 100; UBT, 95, 95; IgG serology, 99, 91; and IgA serology, 88, 91. The accuracy of the RUT and LUT was reduced in patients receiving HRA therapy (P = 0.04 and 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: Culture, UBT, and IgG serology were all superior to the other four tests in diagnosing H. pylori infection. Invasive urease-based tests were less accurate in patients receiving HRAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]