1. Taphonomy and chronosequence of the 709 ka Kalinga site formation (Luzon Island, Philippines)
- Author
-
P.C.H. Albers, X. Gallet, Marian C Reyes, Thomas Ingicco, A. D. Cosalan, A. Bautista, G. D. van den Bergh, J. de Vos, I. Lipardo, M. Belarmino, Noel Amano, Histoire naturelle de l'Homme préhistorique (HNHP), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Université de Perpignan Via Domitia (UPVD)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), National Museum of the Philippines, Padre Burgos St., 1000, Manila, The Philippines, Naturalis Biodiversity Center [Leiden], Archaeological Studies Program, Albert Hall, University of the Philippines, Diliman, 1101, Quezon City, The Philippines, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Kahlaische Str. 10, 07745, Jena, Germany, and Centre for Archaeological Science, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
- Subjects
010506 paleontology ,Multidisciplinary ,Taphonomy ,[SHS.ARCHEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and Prehistory ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Pleistocene ,Chronosequence ,lcsh:R ,Natural hazards ,lcsh:Medicine ,Excavation ,01 natural sciences ,Archaeology ,Article ,Deposition (geology) ,Natural (archaeology) ,Mudflow ,lcsh:Q ,lcsh:Science ,Geology ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Faunal assemblage - Abstract
The recently described site of Kalinga in the Philippines adds to our understanding of Early-Middle Pleistocene hominin behaviour. Yet, disentangling the natural from the anthropogenic modifications that have taken place in such an old archaeological site is challenging. In this paper we use a set of taphonomic tools at hand to rectify the distortion made by natural processes during the formation of the Kalinga site. From the description of the ribs completeness, surface damages and scattering in the excavation, one can reconstruct the butchery, transport and deposition sequence of the rhino carcass and its post-depositional disturbances and diagenetic evolution of the site. We conclude that the rhino and the stone artefacts potentially used to deflesh the carcass were transported by a mudflow from its butchery place over a few meters only and got stuck and mixed with an older faunal assemblage that was transported by a small stream. Materials and methods Results Discussion and concluding remarks: Death and butchery of the rhino ; Transport and deposition ; Post‑depositional evolution of the site and diagenesis ; The relative age of the stone artefacts
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF