Search

Abstract Sarcopenia is the age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and function. Computed tomography (CT) assessments of sarcopenia utilize measurements of skeletal muscle cross-sectional area (SMA), radiation attenuation (SMRA), and intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). Unadjusted SMA is strongly correlated with both height and body mass index (BMI); therefore, SMA must be adjusted for body size to assess sarcopenic low muscle mass fairly in individuals of different heights and BMI. SMA/height (rather than $$SMA/height^2$$ S M A / h e i g h t 2 ) provides optimal height adjustment, and vertebra-specific relative muscle index (RMI) equations optimally adjust for both height and BMI. Since L3 measurement is not available in all CT scans, sarcopenic low muscle mass may be assessed using other levels. Both a mid-vertebral slice and an inferior slice have been used to define ‘L3 SMA’, but the effect of vertebral slice location on SMA measurements is unexplored. Healthy reference values for skeletal muscle measures at mid- and inferior vertebra slices between T10 and L5, have not yet been reported. We extracted T10 through L5 SMA, SMRA, and IMAT at a mid-vertebral and inferior slice using non-contrast-enhanced CT scans from healthy, adult kidney donor candidates between age 18 and 73. We compared paired differences in SMA between the mid-vertebral slice versus the inferior slice. We calculated the skeletal muscle gauge as $$SMG_{HT}=SMRA*SMI_{HT}$$ S M G HT = S M R A ∗ S M I HT . We used allometric analysis to find the optimal height scaling power for SMA. To enable comparisons with other published reference cohorts, we computed two height-adjusted measures; $$SMI_{HT}=SMA/height$$ S M I HT = S M A / h e i g h t (optimal) and $$SMI_{HT2}=SMA/height^2$$ S M I H T 2 = S M A / h e i g h t 2 (traditional). Using the young, healthy reference cohort, we utilized multiple linear regression to calculate relative muscle index z-scores ( $$RMI_{HT}$$ R M I HT , $$RMI_{HT2}$$ R M I H T 2 ), which adjust for both height and BMI, at each vertebra level. We assessed Pearson correlations of each muscle area measure versus age, height, weight, and BMI separately by sex and vertebra number. We assessed the differences in means between age 18–40 versus 20–40 as the healthy, young adult reference group. We reported means, standard deviations, and sarcopenia cutpoints (mean-2SD and 5th percentile) by sex and age group for all measures. Sex-specific allometric analysis showed that height to the power of one was the optimal adjustment for SMA in both men and women at all vertebra levels. Differences between mid-vertebra and inferior slice SMA were statistically significant at each vertebra level, except for T10 in men. $$SMI_{HT}$$ S M I HT was uncorrelated with height, whereas $$SMI_{HT2}$$ S M I H T 2 was negatively correlated with height at all vertebra levels. Both $$SMI_{HT}$$ S M I HT and $$SMI_{HT2}$$ S M I H T 2 were positively correlated with BMI at all vertebra levels. $$RMI_{HT}$$ R M I HT was uncorrelated with BMI, weight, and height (minimal positive correlation in women at $$\hbox {L3}_{inf}$$ L3 inf , $$\hbox {L4}_{mid}$$ L4 mid , and $$\hbox {L5}_{inf}$$ L5 inf ) whereas $$RMI_{HT2}$$ R M I H T 2 was uncorrelated with BMI, but negatively correlated with height and weight at all levels. There were no significant differences in SMA between 18–40 versus 20–40 age groups. Healthy reference values and sarcopenic cutpoints are reported stratified by sex, vertebra level, and age group for each measure. Height to the power of one (SMA/height) is the optimal height adjustment factor for SMA at all levels between $$\hbox {T10}_{mid}$$ T10 mid through $$\hbox {L5}_{inf}$$ L5 inf . The use of $$SMA/height^2$$ S M A / h e i g h t 2 should be discontinued as it retains a significant negative correlation with height and is therefore biased towards identifying sarcopenia in taller individuals. Measurement of SMA at a mid-vertebral slice is significantly different from measurement of SMA at an inferior aspect slice. Reference values should be used for the appropriate slice. We report sarcopenic healthy reference values for skeletal muscle measures at the mid-vertebral and inferior aspect slice for T10 through L5 vertebra levels. Relative muscle index (RMI) equations developed here minimize correlation with both height and BMI, producing unbiased assessments of relative muscle mass across the full range of body sizes. We recommend the use of these RMI equations in other cohorts.

Abstract Evidence supporting aortic calcification as a leverageable cardiovascular risk factor is rapidly growing. Given aortic calcification’s potential as a clinical correlate, we assessed granular vertebral-indexed calcification measurements of the abdominal aorta in a well curated reference population. We evaluated the relationship of aortic calcification measurements with Framingham risk scores. After exclusion, 4073 participants from the Reference Analytic Morphomic Population with varying vertebral levels were included. The percent of the aortic wall calcified was used to assess calcification burden at the L1–L4 levels. Descriptive statistics of participants, sex-specific vertebral indexed calcification measurements, relational plots, and relevant associations are reported. Mean aortic attenuation was higher in female than male participants. Overall, mean aortic calcium was higher with reference to inferior abdominal aortic measurements and demonstrated significant differences across all abdominal levels [L3 Area (mm $$^2$$ 2 ): Females 6.34 (sd 16.60), Males 6.23 (sd 17.21); L3 Volume (mm $$^3$$ 3 ): Females 178.90 (sd 474.19), Males 195.80 (sd 547.36); Wall Calcification (%): Females (L4) 6.97 (sd 16.03), Males (L3) 5.46 (13.80)]. Participants with elevated calcification had significantly higher Framingham risk scores compared to participants with normal calcification scores. Opportunistically measuring aortic calcification may inform further cardiovascular risk assessment and enhance cardiovascular event surveillance efforts.

Abstract Plantar pressure has been used to understand loading on infant feet as gait develops. Previous literature focused on straight walking, despite turning accounting for 25% of infant self-directed steps. We aimed to compare centre of pressure and plantar pressure in walking steps in different directions in infants. Twenty-five infants who were walking confidently participated in the study (aged 449 ± 71 days, 96 ± 25 days after first steps). Plantar pressure and video were recorded whilst five steps per infant were combined for three step types: straight, turning inwards and outwards. Centre of pressure trajectory components were compared for path length and velocity. Pedobarographic Statistical Parametric Mapping explored differences in peak plantar pressure for the three step types. Significant differences were identified primarily in the forefoot with higher peak pressures in straight steps. Centre of pressure path was longer in the medial–lateral direction during turning (outward 4.6 ± 2.3, inward 6.8 ± 6.1, straight 3.5 ± 1.2 cm, p

Abstract Measurements of visceral adipose tissue cross-sectional area and radiation attenuation from computed tomography (CT) scans provide useful information about risk and mortality. However, scan protocols vary, encompassing differing vertebra levels and utilizing differing phases of contrast enhancement. Furthermore, fat measurements have been extracted from CT using different Hounsfield Unit (HU) ranges. To our knowledge, there have been no large studies of healthy cohorts that reported reference values for visceral fat area and radiation attenuation at multiple vertebra levels, for different contrast phases, and using different fat HU ranges. Two-phase CT scans from 1,677 healthy, adult kidney donors (age 18–65) between 1999 and 2017, previously studied to determine healthy reference values for skeletal muscle measures, were utilized. Visceral adipose tissue cross-sectional area (VFA) and radiation attenuation (VFRA) measures were quantified using axial slices at T10 through L4 vertebra levels. T-tests were used to compare males and females, while paired t-tests were conducted to determine the effect (magnitude and direction) of (a) contrast enhancement and (b) different fat HU ranges on each fat measure at each vertebra level. We report the means, standard deviations, and effect sizes of contrast enhancement and fat HU range. Male and female VFA and VFRA were significantly different at all vertebra levels in both contrast and non-contrast scans. Peak VFA was observed at L4 in females and L2 in males, while peak VFRA was observed at L1 in both females and males. In general, non-contrast scans showed significantly greater VFA and VFRA compared to contrast scans. The average paired difference due to contrast ranged from 1.6 to − 8% (VFA) and 3.2 to − 3.0% (VFRA) of the non-contrast value. HU range showed much greater differences in VFA and VFRA than contrast. The average paired differences due to HU range ranged from − 5.3 to 22.2% (VFA) and − 5.9 to 13.6% (VFRA) in non-contrast scans, and − 4.4 to 20.2% (VFA) and − 4.1 to 12.6% (VFRA) in contrast scans. The − 190 to − 30 HU range showed the largest differences in both VFA (10.8% to 22.2%) and VFRA (7.6% to 13.6%) compared to the reference range (− 205 to − 51 HU). Incidentally, we found that differences in lung inflation result in very large differences in visceral fat measures, particularly in the thoracic region. We assessed the independent effects of contrast presence and fat HU ranges on visceral fat cross-sectional area and mean radiation attenuation, finding significant differences particularly between different fat HU ranges. These results demonstrate that CT measurements of visceral fat area and radiation attenuation are strongly dependent upon contrast presence, fat HU range, sex, breath cycle, and vertebra level of measurement. We quantified contrast and non-contrast reference values separately for males and females, using different fat HU ranges, for lumbar and thoracic CT visceral fat measures at multiple vertebra levels in a healthy adult US population.

Abstract Measurements of skeletal muscle cross-sectional area (SMA) at the level of the third lumbar (L3) vertebra derived from clinical computed tomography (CT) scans are commonly used in assessments of sarcopenia, the loss of skeletal muscle mass and function associated with aging. As SMA is correlated with height and Body Mass Index (BMI), body size adjustment is necessary to fairly assess sarcopenic low muscle mass in individuals of different height and BMI. The skeletal muscle index, a widely used measure, adjusts for height as $$(SMA/height^2)$$ ( S M A / h e i g h t 2 ) but uses no BMI adjustment. There is no agreed upon standard for body size adjustment. We extracted L3 SMA using non-contrast-enhanced CT scans from healthy adults, split into ‘Under-40’ and ‘Over-40’ cohorts. Sex-specific allometric analysis showed that height to the power of one was the optimal integer coefficient for height adjusted SMA in both males and females. We computed two height-adjusted measures $$SMA_{HT}=SMA/height$$ S M A HT = S M A / h e i g h t and $$SMA_{HT2}=SMA/height^2$$ S M A H T 2 = S M A / h e i g h t 2 , comparing their Pearson correlations versus age, height, weight, and BMI separately by sex and cohort. Finally, in the ‘Under-40’ cohort, we used linear regression to convert each height-adjusted measure into a z-score ( $$z(SMA_{HT})$$ z ( S M A HT ) , $$z(SMA_{HT2})$$ z ( S M A H T 2 ) ) adjusted for BMI. $$SMA_{HT}$$ S M A HT was less correlated with height in both males and females ( $$r=0.005$$ r = 0.005 , $$p=0.91$$ p = 0.91 and $$r=0.1$$ r = 0.1 , $$p=0.01$$ p = 0.01 ) than $$SMA_{HT2}$$ S M A H T 2 ( $$r=-\,0.30$$ r = - 0.30 and $$r=-\,0.21$$ r = - 0.21 , $$p

Abstract Measurements of skeletal muscle cross-sectional area, index, and radiation attenuation utilizing clinical computed tomography (CT) scans are used in assessments of sarcopenia, the loss of skeletal muscle mass and function associated with aging. To classify individuals as sarcopenic, sex-specific cutoffs for ‘low’ values are used. Conventionally, cutoffs for skeletal muscle measurements at the level of the third lumbar (L3) vertebra are used, however L3 is not included in several clinical CT protocols. Non-contrast-enhanced CT scans from healthy kidney donor candidates (age 18–40) at Michigan Medicine were utilized. Skeletal muscle area (SMA), index (SMI), and mean attenuation (SMRA) were measured at each vertebral level between the tenth thoracic (T10) and the fifth lumbar (L5) vertebra. Sex-specific means, standard deviations (s.d.), and sarcopenia cutoffs (mean-2 s.d.) at each vertebral level were computed. Associations between vertebral levels were assessed using Pearson correlations and Tukey’s difference test. Classification agreement between different vertebral level cutoffs was assessed using overall accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. SMA, SMI, and SMRA L3 cutoffs for sarcopenia were 92.2 cm2, 34.4 cm2/m2, and 34.3 HU in females, and 144.3 cm2, 45.4 cm2/m2, and 38.5 HU in males, consistent with previously reported cutoffs. Correlations between all level pairs were statistically significant and high, ranging from 0.65 to 0.95 (SMA), 0.64 to 0.95 (SMI), and 0.63 to 0.95 (SMRA). SMA peaks at L3, supporting its use as the primary site for CT sarcopenia measurements. However, when L3 is not available alternative levels (in order of preference) are L2, L4, L5, L1, T12, T11, and T10. Healthy reference values reported here enable sarcopenia assessment and sex-specific standardization of SMA, SMI, and SMRA in clinical populations, including those whose CT protocols do not include L3.

Evidence supporting aortic calcification as a leverageable cardiovascular risk factor is rapidly growing. Given aortic calcification's potential as a clinical correlate, we assessed granular vertebral-indexed calcification measurements of the abdominal aorta in a well curated reference population. We evaluated the relationship of aortic calcification measurements with Framingham risk scores. After exclusion, 4073 participants from the Reference Analytic Morphomic Population with varying vertebral levels were included. The percent of the aortic wall calcified was used to assess calcification burden at the L1–L4 levels. Descriptive statistics of participants, sex-specific vertebral indexed calcification measurements, relational plots, and relevant associations are reported. Mean aortic attenuation was higher in female than male participants. Overall, mean aortic calcium was higher with reference to inferior abdominal aortic measurements and demonstrated significant differences across all abdominal levels [L3 Area (mm 2 ): Females 6.34 (sd 16.60), Males 6.23 (sd 17.21); L3 Volume (mm 3 ): Females 178.90 (sd 474.19), Males 195.80 (sd 547.36); Wall Calcification (%): Females (L4) 6.97 (sd 16.03), Males (L3) 5.46 (13.80)]. Participants with elevated calcification had significantly higher Framingham risk scores compared to participants with normal calcification scores. Opportunistically measuring aortic calcification may inform further cardiovascular risk assessment and enhance cardiovascular event surveillance efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]