Search

Inhibitory antibodies that develop in patients with hemophilia render standard therapy with factor concentrates ineffective. Several factors may influence inhibitor incidence, including genetics, the type of factor concentrate, and environment. A higher incidence of inhibitors in siblings compared to extended relatives, and in African Americans compared to Caucasians, suggests that genetics may play an important role in inhibitor development; however, genetic markers that indicate a predisposition for inhibitor development have yet to be identified. In addition, the appearance of inhibitors in immunologically challenged patients points to the role of the immune response system in the development of inhibitor antibodies, an area that warrants further study. Thus, the medical community faces the difficult task of developing new, improved therapies to combat inhibitors in patients with hemophilia, a task that will require careful consideration of the roles of environmental factors, the immune system, and genetics in inhibitor development.

Patients with mild/moderate hemophilia A (MHA) may develop inhibitors to factor VIII (FVIII). In this condition, FVIII clotting activity (FVIII:C) baseline levels may remain stable for some patients, but may be reduced to less than 0.01 U/mL for others. Several risk factors for the development of inhibitors in MHA have been proposed. Genetic factors, such as mutations in the FVIII gene, may play a central role; however, other influences, such as intensive treatment with FVIII products, may also be important. Optimal treatment regimens have yet to be determined, not only for the eradication of inhibitors, but also for the management or surgical prophylaxis of hemorrhages associated with this condition. Several treatment options for the control of bleeding in patients with MHA and inhibitors (MHAI) are currently available, and the choice of therapeutic strategy should be given careful consideration; some treatments may produce an anamnestic response, thus delaying the return to FVIII:C baseline levels and adversely affecting the duration of the severe bleeding phenotype. To increase our knowledge of MHAI, a retrospective collection of data is currently being performed among hemophilia centers in France and Belgium. Based on five examples of patients with MHAI collated from preliminary study data, we illustrate the impact on inhibitor outcome of the therapeutic choices used to treat bleeding episodes in these patients.

Factor XI (FXI) deficiency is a rare bleeding disorder that may arise from any of a number of missense, nonsense, splice site, insertion, and deletion mutations within the FXI gene. Severely affected patients are at considerable risk of developing inhibitors to FXI and, although spontaneous bleeding is uncommon in such patients, bleeding after surgery or trauma can be severe. As treatment with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or FXI concentrates is ineffective in patients with inhibitors, other therapies must be sought. Traditionally, such patients have been treated with various agents and methods, including plasma exchange, cyclophosphamide, intravenous immunoglobulin, and prothrombin complex concentrates. However, emerging data indicate that recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa; NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) may also be effective in FXI deficiency with inhibitors. Further work is required to determine the optimal dosing schedules of the agent in this indication.

Inhibitor formation occurs at a frequency of 20% to 30% in severe hemophilia A, and 3% in hemophilia B. Today, it represents the major complication in patient care and renders classical substitution therapy ineffective. Genetic factors, such as factor VIII (FVIII) gene mutations and immune response genes, particularly the major histocompatibility complex, have been shown to constitute decisive risk factors for the development of inhibitors. In severe hemophilia A and B, those mutations that result in the absence or severe truncation of the FVIII/factor IX (FIX) proteins are associated with the highest risk for inhibitor formation, indicating that a major driving force in inhibitor development is the presentation of a novel antigen to the patient's immune system. An alternative pathomechanism may underlie inhibitor development in patients with mild hemophilia A. Missense mutations, especially those in the C1/C2 domains, may alter the immunogenicity of the FVIII protein, eliciting an inhibitor response against the mutated epitope. In some patients with hemophilia B, especially those with large deletions to the FIX gene, a severe allergic reaction occurs simultaneously with inhibitor onset. Despite the obviously strong genetic predisposition, discordant inhibitor status in monozygotic hemophilia A twins demonstrates that environmental factors also play a role in the development of inhibitors.