Search

von Willebrand factor (VWF) forms high-molecular-weight multimers and plays an essential role in hemostasis, and thus its deficiency leads to bleeding symptoms. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is rare, but potentially underdiagnosed, and develops in various underlying disorders. AVWS caused by anti-VWF autoantibodies is a rare subcategory of AVWS that can also be referred to as autoimmune VWF deficiency (AiVWFD). We performed a search of patients with autoimmune coagulation factor deficiencies in our nationwide survey in Japan. Among these, suspected cases of AiVWFD were extremely few, with only 11 case consultations in the last 10 years. Of these, three and five were respectively positive for anti-VWF autoantibodies (anti-VWF-Ab) and VWF inhibitor (VWF-inh). We also performed an extensive literature search of other cases from Japan, and in total, 40 cases were finally identified to have AiVWFD, with mean age of 55.0 years. Most underlying disorders were lympho- or myeloproliferative diseases, followed by autoimmune diseases. The major bleeding sites were subcutaneous and mucosal, the bleeding severity was moderate, and there were no hemorrhagic deaths. Bleeding time was prolonged; factor VIII activity, VWF antigen, and VWF activity were decreased, and high-molecular-weight VWF multimers were absent or decreased. These are similar to the common abnormal laboratory findings observed among general AVWS cases. Hemostatic therapy often involved VWF concentrates and vasopressin, and antibody eradication therapy often included corticosteroids and achieved remission. Notably, of all cases, 68% had anti-VWF-Abs, and 83% of anti-VWF-Ab-positive patients were also VWF-inh positive. To accumulate precise clinical information on AiVWFD, it is necessary to verify and improve the measurement methods for both anti-VWF-Ab and anti-VWF-inh. These findings from Japan should be confirmed in other geographic localities.

Type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common subtype of VWD, comprising 75% of VWD patients. We provide a systematic review of type 1 VWD in pregnancy. Our objective was to evaluate the rate of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in patients with known type 1 VWD. The primary outcome was rate of PPH. Primary PPH was defined as a cumulative blood loss ≥1,000 mL, or blood loss accompanied by signs and symptoms of hypovolemia within 24 hours postpartum or requiring blood products. Secondary PPH was defined as significant bleeding 24 hours to 12 weeks postpartum. Relevant articles published in English pertaining to VWD and pregnancy were identified without any time or study limitations. Seven articles (n = 144 pregnancies) met inclusion criteria. The rate of primary PPH was 4/144 (2.8%). The secondary PPH rate was reported in four studies, and occurred in 7/48 pregnancies (14.6%), ranging from 2 to 19 days postpartum. In conclusion, according to this systematic review, the frequency of primary PPH in pregnancies with known type 1 VWD is 2.8%. This is similar to the overall PPH rates of 3% reported in the literature. Although the sample size was small, secondary PPH occurred in almost 15% of pregnancies, while in the overall obstetrical population this occurs in approximately 1% of cases. Patients with known type 1 VWD may not be at increased risk of primary PPH, though they appear to bear increased risk of secondary PPH.

Accurate diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) depends on the quality, precision, and variability of the laboratory assays. The North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association (NASCOLA) is a provider of external quality assessment (EQA) for approximately 60 specialized coagulation laboratories in North America. In this report, NASCOLA EQA data from 2010 to 2021 are reviewed for trends in methodology and precision among various assays. In particular, recent ASH ISTH NHF WFH (American Society of Hematology, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, National Hemophilia Foundation, and World Hemophilia Federation) guidelines for diagnosis of VWD are reviewed in light of EQA data. In contrast to other geographic regions, laboratories in North America predominantly use three-assay screening panels (antigen, platelet-binding activity, and factor VIII [FVIII] activity) rather than four-assay panels (antigen, platelet-binding activity, FVIII activity, and collagen-binding activity). They also use latex immunoassays rather than chemiluminescence immunoassays, and the classic ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) assay and monoclonal antibody (VWF:Ab) assay to assess VWF platelet-binding activity over newer recommended assays (VWF:GPIbM and VWF:GPIbR). Factors that may be influencing these North American practice patterns include lack of Food and Drug Administration approval of the VWF:GPIbM, VWF:GPIbR, collagen binding assays, and chemiluminescence methodologies, and the influence of the 2008 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines on laboratory practice. Lastly, systems-based solutions are urgently needed to improve the overall accuracy of laboratory testing for VWD by minimizing preanalytical variables and adopting assay standardization.

Background Reduced or dysfunctional von Willebrand factor (VWF) may lead to von Willebrand disease (VWD), which is a common inherited bleeding disorder. VWD is classified into three major types: type 1 is a partial quantitative deficiency of VWF, type 3 is a complete quantitative deficiency of VWF, and type 2 consists of qualitative abnormalities of VWF. To arrive at a correct VWD diagnosis, multiple tests and a correct interpretation of these tests are needed. Aim The aim of the present study was to gain insight into the approach of laboratories toward VWD diagnosis. Methods Data from four samples of the external quality assessment (EQA) VWF surveys of the ECAT (External Quality Control for Assays and Tests) were evaluated. Furthermore, results were analyzed of a questionnaire that was sent to hemostasis laboratories about VWD diagnostic approaches. Results For most EQA samples, the majority of participants indicated the correct classification. However, 6 to 60% indicated another classification. For all samples, significant differences in VWF results were observed between the correct and incorrect classifications. The questionnaire demonstrated that the testing approach varied between the laboratories, especially for parameters that were essential for discrimination between VWD type 1 and healthy individuals, as well as the cutoff values used to discriminate VWD types 1 and 2. Conclusions Diagnosis of VWD is heterogeneous in diagnostic approach, guidelines, and cutoff values within large ranges of VWF results between laboratories. Harmonization of approaches and increased accuracy of VWF measurements may help to establish a correct diagnosis.

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is one of the most common hereditary bleeding disorders. Effective management of patients and their families depends on accurate diagnosis and subtype classification, and quality assurance including participation in proficiency testing programs is essential to ensure the accuracy of the panel of assays required to achieve this diagnosis. We report here findings from recent external quality assessment (EQA) exercises, as well as from a questionnaire about diagnostic practices employed by centers in the United Kingdom National Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) performing von Willebrand factor (VWF) assays. Plasma samples from donors with VWD, “normal” donors, the International Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific Subcommittee (ISTH SSC) plasma standard, and whole blood samples were sent to participants in the UK NEQAS BC program for VWF investigation. Calibration of lot#5 of the ISTH SSC plasma standard was shown to give improved comparability between the recovered value from an EQA exercise and the assigned potency for VWF activity assays. Diagnostic accuracy and precision amongst UK NEQAS participants was good, with an average 99% of centers reporting the correct interpretation for normal, type 1 and type 2 VWD samples, 100% diagnostic accuracy for centers performing FVIII binding assays, and good agreement amongst centers performing multimeric analysis. Genetic analysis of the VWF gene by specialist centers demonstrated errors in the genotyping process in one center, but also demonstrated failings in the interpretation of results in other centers. Despite evidence of good laboratory accuracy and precision in their assays, a questionnaire identified marked variation in diagnostic criteria employed, underlining the importance of guidelines to support the diagnosis of VWD.

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) level and/or function is altered in von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common heritable bleeding disorder worldwide. Laboratory assessment of VWF is continually evolving. Historically, the primary method for the assessment of VWF platelet-binding activity was the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo). Contemporary alternative measures of VWF platelet-binding activity include VWF:GPIbR (recombinant; using ristocetin), VWF:GPIbM (recombinant; gain-of-function mutant), and monoclonal antibody. Recently, the American Society of Hematology, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, National Hemophilia Foundation, and World Federation of Hemophilia collaboration issued guidelines recommending the use of newer assays of VWF platelet-binding activity (VWF: GPIbM, VWF: GPIbR) over VWF:RCo, given known limitations of the VWF:RCo assay. Despite this recommendation, the newer VWF:GPIbM and VWF:GPIbR assays are not United States Food and Drug Administration cleared, limiting their availability in the United States. We sought to assess assay utilization trends, agreement of VWF testing methods, and imprecision of VWF testing (based on assigned sample type) from the College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing Surveys. The analysis confirms that, while VWF antigen testing has low imprecision, the various VWF activity assays have significant interassay variability, with VWF:RCo showing greater imprecision than the newer GPIb-binding assays. The overall trends in assay utilization reflect the barriers to complete compliance with modern VWD diagnostic guidelines in North America.

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common bleeding disorder that arises from deficiency and/or defects of von Willebrand factor (VWF). Appropriate diagnosis of VWD, including differential identification of qualitative (types 2A, 2B, 2M, 2N VWD) versus quantitative (types 1 and 3 VWD) defects remains problematic but has important management implications, given differential therapy. Complete assessment for VWD in a patient with a bleeding history requires comprehensive test panels, including VWF activity and antigen. We describe the Australasian experience, using data from the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA) Quality Assurance Program (QAP) related to VWF testing in their VWD test module. The RCPAQAP has been providing samples for VWF testing since 1998, representing 25 years of proficiency testing related to VWD diagnosis. A total of 109 samples have been dispatched to participants over these years, with current assessment involving dispatches of two samples (=4 samples) per year. Samples have represented all types of VWD, as well as normal or other samples, including acquired von Willebrand syndrome and plasma VWF concentrates as used in VWD therapy. Different VWF assays and activity/antigen ratios show different utility in VWD and type identification. In the past 9 years of data capture, a total of 166 errors were identified from a total of 1,839 interpretations, representing a base error rate of 9.0%. Identification errors were highest for type 2 VWD samples (15.3%), intermediate for type 1 VWD samples (7.5%), and lowest for normal samples (2.4%). Errors can be linked to assay limitations, including assay variability and low-level VWF detection limits, as well as laboratory issues (including test result misinterpretation, which accounts for approximately 40% of all errors for type 2 VWD). For test-associated errors, VWF:RCo and VWF:GPIbM were associated with the highest variability and error rate, which was up to 10x higher than that using VWF:CB. As a test group, chemiluminescence-based procedures were associated with lowest inter-laboratory variability, best low-level VWF detection (down to

Type 2A and 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD) broadly show similar phenotypic parameters, but involve different pathophysiological mechanisms. This report presents the clinical and laboratory profiles of type 2A and type 2M patients genotypically diagnosed at one large center. Higher bleeding score values and a higher incidence of major bleeding episodes were observed in type 2A compared with type 2M, potentially reflective of the absence of large and intermediate von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers in 2A. In type 2A, most of disease-causing variants (DCVs) appeared to be responsible for increased VWF clearance and DCV clustered in the VWF-A1 domain resulted in more severe clinical profiles. In type 2M, DCV in the VWF-A1 domain showed different laboratory patterns, related to either reduced synthesis or shortened VWF survival, and DCV in the VWF-A2 domain showed patterns related mainly to shortened survival. VWF-type 1 collagen binding/Ag (C1B/Ag) showed different patterns according to DCV location: in type 2A VWD, C1B/Ag was much lower when DCVs were located in the VWF-A2 domain. In type 2M with DCV in the VWF-A1domain, C1B/Ag was normal, but with DCV in the VWF-A2 domain, C1B/Ag was low. The higher frequency of major bleeding in VWD 2M patients with DCV in the VWF-A2 domain than that with DCV in the VWF-A1 domain could be a summative effect of abnormal C1B/Ag, on top of the reduced VWF-GPIb binding. In silico modeling suggests that DCV impairing the VWF-A2 domain somehow modulates collagen binding to the VWF-A3 domain. Concomitant normal FVIII:C/Ag and VWFpp/Ag, mainly in type 2M VWD, suggest that other nonidentified pathophysiological mechanisms, neither related to synthesis/retention nor survival of VWF, would be responsible for the presenting phenotype.

The biological mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of type 2 and type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) have been studied extensively. In contrast, although accounting for the majority of VWD cases, the pathobiology underlying partial quantitative VWD has remained somewhat elusive. However, important insights have been attained following several recent cohort studies that have investigated mechanisms in patients with type 1 VWD and low von Willebrand factor (VWF), respectively. These studies have demonstrated that reduced plasma VWF levels may result from either (1) decreased VWF biosynthesis and/or secretion in endothelial cells and (2) pathological increased VWF clearance. In addition, it has become clear that some patients with only mild to moderate reductions in plasma VWF levels in the 30 to 50 IU/dL range may have significant bleeding phenotypes. Importantly in these low VWF patients, bleeding risk fails to correlate with plasma VWF levels and inheritance is typically independent of the VWF gene. Although plasma VWF levels may increase to > 50 IU/dL with progressive aging or pregnancy in these subjects, emerging data suggest that this apparent normalization in VWF levels does not necessarily equate to a complete correction in bleeding phenotype in patients with partial quantitative VWD. In this review, these recent advances in our understanding of quantitative VWD pathogenesis are discussed. Furthermore, the translational implications of these emerging findings are considered, particularly with respect to designing personalized treatment plans for VWD patients undergoing elective procedures.

For many women, pregnancy and childbirth represent their first major hemostatic challenges. Despite advancements in obstetric care, up to 2 to 5% of all deliveries are complicated by postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). To mitigate bleeding risk, physiological changes occur in pregnancy, including increases in plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII levels. For women with von Willebrand disease (VWD), these physiological alterations are blunted or absent. As a result, women with VWD have a heightened risk of PPH, both primary (in the first 24 hours) and secondary (>24 hours to 6 to 12 weeks postpartum). Pregnancy and delivery management for women with VWD should therefore be carefully coordinated as part of a multidisciplinary team approach. In the absence of large-scale clinical trials, the management of women with VWD during pregnancy is guided by expert consensus guidelines. Clinical practices internationally are not uniform, and areas of considerable clinical uncertainty exist. Traditional peripartum plasma VWF thresholds for hemostatic cover and therapeutic targets are currently under scrutiny, as PPH is not eliminated in women with VWD who receive replacement therapy. The benefit and optimal duration of postpartum tranexamic acid have yet to be defined, and standardized methods of quantification of blood loss at the time of delivery are currently lacking. In this article, we review the evidence base to date and explore the current clinical challenges in the management of pregnant women with VWD.

Sequencing of the gene encoding for von Willebrand factor (VWF) has brought new insight into the physiology of VWF as well as its pathophysiology in the context of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Molecular testing in VWD patients has shown high variability in the overall genetic background of this condition. Almost 600 mutations and many disease-causing mechanisms have been described in the 35 years since the VWF gene was identified. Genetic testing in VWD patients is now available in many centers as a part of the VWD diagnostic algorithm. Molecular mechanisms leading to types 2 and 3 VWD are well characterized; thus, information from genetic analysis in these VWD types may be beneficial for their correct classification. However, the molecular basis of type 1 VWD is still not fully elucidated and most likely represents a multifactorial disorder reflecting a combined impact of environmental and genetic factors within and outside of VWF. Regarding sequencing methods, the previous gold-standard Sanger sequencing is gradually being replaced with next-generation sequencing methods that are more cost- and time-effective. Instead of gene-by-gene approaches, gene panels of genes for coagulation factors and related proteins have recently become a center of attention in patients with inherited bleeding disorders, especially because a high proportion of VWD patients, mainly those with low VWF plasma levels (type 1), appear to be free of mutations in VWF. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) are accessible in a very limited number of laboratories. Results from these studies have presented several genes other than VWF or ABO possibly affecting VWF levels, and such findings will need further validation studies.

Obtaining a personal history of bleeding is a critical component to the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD). The collection of this information can be challenging for physicians, however, as the reporting and interpretation of bleeding symptoms is subjective. The need for more precise quantification of bleeding symptoms was recognized and the Vicenza Bleeding Questionnaire was developed in 2005. This questionnaire collects data regarding the presence and severity of bleeding symptoms and generates a bleeding score by summing the severity of all symptoms reported by a patient. Several subsequent bleeding assessment tools (BATs) have been developed based from this original questionnaire and there has been a surge in the use of BATs in various clinical settings for the diagnosis and evaluation of VWD. This review will discuss the evolution of BATs over the past decade, as well as their use and validation in various settings for the diagnosis and evaluation of VWD. Additionally, we will discuss the clinical utility of BATs, the limitations of these tools, and future directions.

Von Willebrand disease type 2B (VWD2B) expresses gain-of-function mutations that enhance binding of an individual's von Willebrand factor (VWF) to its platelet ligand, glycoprotein Ib (GPIb), and which are usually identified by increased ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA). We describe here the phenotypic profile of 38 genotypically selected VWD2B-affected family members (AFMs) belonging to 19 unrelated families. Major bleeding was observed in 68.4% of AFMs (previous to their diagnosis and registered by lifetime interviews), with a total of 46 episodes (1.21/patient), and was found to be highly related to the individual bleeding score and presence of thrombocytopenia, but otherwise unrelated to other laboratory parameters. Excessive muco-cutaneous bleeding symptoms were often reported, the most frequent of which comprised menorrhagia, epistaxis, easy bruising, and bleeding after teeth extraction/in oral cavity. Eight unaffected family members were also studied. The prevalence of VWD2B within families was 0.826, and the penetrance of mutations was complete, making it mandatory to study entire family sets to complete diagnostic profiles. Seven heterozygous missense mutations were found, the most common being p.V1316M. In the p.R1308C group, 75% of the AFMs showed absence of RIPA at 0.5 mg/mL, 66.6% of whom had VWF:RCo

Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) depends on personal and family history of bleeding and confirmatory laboratory testing. Currently available phenotypic tests for VWD contain potential sources for error that may distort results. Despite an exponential growth of information about the von Willebrand factor gene (VWF), the role of molecular diagnosis in VWD is still controversial. Due to the complexity and high cost of conventional molecular analyses, some investigators have recommended limiting this approach to distinguish suspected type 2N VWD from hemophilia A, type 2B from platelet-type VWD, and the exploration of type 3 VWD. New genetic methodologies and approaches are becoming available, but there is still some reluctance for their implementation in VWD diagnosis. This article discusses the pros and cons of molecular testing in VWD considering the experience obtained through the multicenter project “Molecular and Clinical Profile of VWD in Spain (PCM-EVW-ES).”

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common, inherited bleeding disorder. There are three main types of VWD, which result in a quantitative or qualitative deficiency in von Willebrand factor (VWF) and in severe cases, also Factor VIII (FVIII). The severity of bleeding depends on the underlying pathophysiology. Type 1 VWD is usually mild, while types 2 or 3 VWD can be associated with moderate or significant bleeding. Managing pregnant women with VWD requires a multidisciplinary approach. Such patients are at increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage. Whether women with VWD are at increased risk of spontaneous abortion remains unclear. Because of increased risk of bleeding, there are special considerations for delivery and obstetrical analgesia. There is a lack of high-quality evidence supporting monitoring and treatment of VWD in pregnancy. Most experts recommend that FVIII and VWF levels be monitored prior to delivery and treatment initiated when levels remain below 0.50 IU/mL. Some experts consider desmopressin (DDAVP) to be the preferred initial treatment in type 1 and most type 2 VWD. DDAVP is relatively contraindicated in type 2B disease. Plasma-derived FVIII and VWF replacements are the treatment of choice in type 2B and 3 VWD and in type 1 or 2 VWD when patients do not respond to DDAVP.

Congenital von Willebrand disease (VWD) and acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) reflect conditions caused by von Willebrand factor (VWF) deficiency and/or defects. VWD is the most common inherited bleeding disorder and AVWS arises from a variety of causes. Since VWF stabilizes and protects factor VIII (FVIII) in the circulation, this is also reduced in many patients with VWD. The treatment of VWD and AVWS therefore primarily entails replacement of VWF, and sometimes FVIII, to protect against bleeding. This may entail the use of VWF concentrates (currently plasma-derived) and/or FVIII concentrates (currently plasma-derived or more increasingly recombinant forms), and/or desmopressin to release endogenous VWF in subgroups of patients. For AVWS additional treatment of the underlying condition is also required. Adjunct therapies include antifibrinolytics. Globally, various formulations exist for both VWF and FVIII concentrates and are differentially available based on manufacturer marketing or regulatory approvals/clearances in different geographies. Also, guidelines for treatment of VWD vary for different localities and recombinant VWF is undergoing clinical trials. The current review provides an overview of the treatment of VWD as currently practiced in developed countries, and also provides a glimpse towards the future.

There is a growing proportion of the elderly population in the Western world, and these individuals require special considerations regarding a broad variety of aspects, including treatment approaches to illnesses that affect all age groups. The hemostatic system in individuals changes considerably with aging. Specifically, changes in levels of procoagulant and natural anticoagulant factors along with thrombopathy simultaneously create a hypercoagulable state and hemostatic difficulties. Underlying morbidities, such as congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, and cancer, increase the risk for venous and arterial thrombosis. This population is also increasingly affected by acquired bleeding disorders, including acquired hemophilia and acquired von Willebrand syndrome, as well as mild congenital bleeding disorders. Real-life data demonstrate that recurrent and fatal venous thromboembolism is the major hemostatic concern in the elderly. The fact that treatment of thrombotic complications increases the bleeding risk also has to be taken into consideration, particularly in the older age group. This remains true in the era of direct oral anticoagulants. In conclusion, maintaining a delicate balance between thrombosis and bleeding risks is the key issue in providing qualified treatment to elderly patients.

An increased von Willebrand factor propeptide (VWFpp) to VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) ratio (VWFpp/VWF:Ag) indicates an enhanced clearance of VWF. This finding has been described in von Willebrand disease (VWD) and in acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS). A distinction between these two diseases, one congenital and the other acquired, is primarily based on family and personal history of bleeding. However, if this information is scanty, the diagnosis might be challenging due to the lack of an effective diagnostic biomarker. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the ability of VWFpp/VWF:Ag for the differential diagnosis between VWD and AVWS. VWFpp/VWF:Ag was measured in a group of 153 patients (125 with VWD and 28 with AVWS). Most patients with AVWS and VWD showed an increased VWFpp/VWF:Ag, although to variable degrees. A marked increase of VWFpp/VWF:Ag was mainly associated with the diagnosis of AVWS and VWD type 1 Vicenza. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to identify the optimal cutoff of VWFpp/VWF:Ag for discrimination of patients with a modestly increased (most VWD cases) versus those with a markedly increased clearance (AVWS and VWD type 1 Vicenza), and this cutoff was identified at the value of 3.9 (sensitivity: 0.70, specificity: 0.97). The ROC curve sorting from a logistic model containing VWFpp/VWF:Ag, age, and sex had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% confidence interval: 0.80–0.95). A subsequent molecular evaluation discriminated VWD type 1 Vicenza from AVWS. In conclusion, VWFpp/VWF:Ag appears helpful to discriminate patients with a markedly increase VWF clearance (AVWS or VWD type 1 Vicenza) from those with a modestly increased clearance (most VWD patients).

von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most commonly known inherited bleeding disorder, is caused by a partial (type 1) or total (type 3) deficiency or dysfunction (type 2) of von Willebrand factor (VWF). Its management encompasses the prevention or treatment of bleeding by raising endogenous VWF levels using a synthetic agent, such as desmopressin, or providing exogenous VWF concentrates. The development of inhibitory alloantibodies against VWF is a rare but often severe complication encountered during the treatment of type 3 VWD, which is associated with a lack of hemostatic response to infused VWF concentrates and more rarely with allergic, even anaphylactic, reactions. This narrative review will focus on the characteristics of such alloantibodies and their management, which can be very challenging for physicians operating at hemophilia treatment centers.

Severe and intractable gastrointestinal bleeding caused by angiodysplasia is a debilitating problem for up to 20% of patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD). Currently, the lack of an optimal treatment for this recurrent problem presents an ongoing challenge for many physicians in their management of affected patients. Over the past few years, studies have pointed to a regulatory role for the hemostatic protein, von Willebrand factor (VWF), in angiogenesis, providing a novel target for the modulation of vessel development. This article will review the clinical implications and molecular pathology of angiodysplasia in VWD.

von Willebrand factor (VWF) plays critical roles in initiating primary hemostasis and extending the half-life of coagulation factor VIII in circulation. VWF levels increase with age and elevated levels are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) due to a deficiency or dysfunction of VWF may have symptoms that ameliorate with aging or may have exacerbation of their disease. Bleeding sites of particular challenge in the aging patient include gastrointestinal bleeding and hematuria. Some medications used to treat VWD should be used with special precaution in older patients, including desmopressin and VWF-containing factor concentrates. Patients with VWD may have some protection from CVD, but in those patients who develop CVD, management is very challenging, given the role of antiplatelet therapy as the mainstay of treatment.

Platelet-type von Willebrand disease (PT-VWD) and type 2B von Willebrand disease (2B-VWD) are rare bleeding disorders characterized by increased ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) at low concentrations of ristocetin. Diagnosis of either condition is not easy and the differential diagnosis between the two entities is especially challenging as evidenced by high levels of misdiagnosis of both conditions, but particularly PT-VWD. Five mutations in the GP1BA gene related to PT-VWD and less than 50 patients are currently reported worldwide. We herein describe a patient with severe bleeding symptoms, macrothrombocytopenia, mild spontaneous platelet aggregation, positive RIPA at 0.3 and 0.4 mg/mL, von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) to antigen (VWF:Ag) T located at nucleotide 3805 in the g.DNA of the patient's GP1BA gene, resulting in a Trp to Leu amino acid change at residue 246 (p.W246L). This mutation was absent in his unaffected mother and also in the 100 controls, and was predicted as damaging by in silico analysis. The residue W246 is located within the VWF-binding region and exists in a strongly conserved position in the phylogenetic tree, which is expected to be unable to tolerate substitutions without changing its functional characteristics. These findings argue strongly in favor of the view that this substitution does not represent a polymorphism and is therefore responsible for the PT-VWD phenotype of the patient Fil: Woods, Adriana Inés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Medicina Experimental. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Sánchez Luceros, Analía Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Medicina Experimental. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Medicina Experimental; Argentina. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires; Argentina Fil: Bermejo, Emilse. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires; Argentina Fil: Paiva, Juvenal. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires; Argentina Fil: Alberto, Maria Fabiana. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires; Argentina Fil: Grosso, Silvia H.. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires; Argentina Fil: Kempfer, Ana Catalina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Medicina Experimental. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Lazzari, María Ángela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Medicina Experimental. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Medicina Experimental; Argentina. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires; Argentina

von Willebrand disease (VWD) was first described nearly a century ago in 1924 by Erik Adolf von Willebrand. Diagnostic testing at the time was very limited and it was not until the mid to late 1900s that more tests became available to assist with the diagnosis and classification of VWD. Two of these tests are based on ristocetin, one being ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) and the other the von Willebrand factor (VWF) ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo). The VWF:RCo assay provides functional assessment of in vitro VWF binding to the platelet glycoprotein (Gp) complex, GPIb-IX-V. Despite some advancements and newer technologies utilizing the principles of the original VWF:RCo assay, the original assay is still referred to as the gold standard for measurement of VWF activity. This article will review the history of VWD diagnostic assays, including RIPA and VWF:RCo over the past 40 years, as well as the newer assays that measure platelet binding with or without ristocetin, and which have been developed with the aim to potentially replace platelet-based ristocetin-dependent assays.

von Willebrand factor (VWF) is an adhesive plasma protein that primarily acts to bridge platelets to sites of vascular injury and thus prevent bleeding. von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder and is caused by deficiency and/or defects of VWF, leading to low levels of plasma VWF or dysfunctional VWF. Factor VIII (FVIII) is also reduced in many patients with VWD, since VWF stabilizes and protects FVIII from degradation. Treatment of VWD primarily entails replacement of VWF, and sometimes FVIII, to protect against bleeding. This may entail use of VWF/FVIII concentrates, and/or desmopressin (1-deamino-8-d-arginine vasopressin) to release endogenous VWF in some patients. Adjunct therapies include antifibrinolytics and hormonal therapies in women. Optimal treatment of VWD entails measuring the effects of treatment, either as a trial before surgery or during therapeutic management. This is usually accomplished by performance of the same tests that are used to help diagnose VWD, although additional monitoring (clinically and/or by laboratory testing) may also be performed. The current review provides an overview of the treatment of VWD but is primarily focused on the monitoring of such therapy.

The UK treatment strategy for von Willebrand disease (VWD) is based on consensus guidelines produced by the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors' Organization (UKHCDO) relating to the diagnosis and management of VWD. Selection of therapeutic products suitable for treatment of this complex inherited bleeding disorder is based on the observed response. Desmopressin (DDAVP), an analog of vasopressin, is the recommended treatment in individuals who respond to this drug on trial infusion. DDAVP clearly has no effect in type 3 VWD but may have variable clinical effect in individuals with other subtypes or may be contraindicated in some cases. In patients where DDAVP treatment is unsuitable, replacement factor concentrate containing von Willebrand factor (VWF) is the recommended alternative. Relevant concentrates are available for all patients in the United Kingdom, and treatment is administered by a network of 67 hemophilia treatment centers that also provide specialist care for individuals diagnosed with VWD. Patients diagnosed with the condition are registered on a national inherited bleeding disorder database administered by the UKHCDO on behalf of the Department of Health to aid in service planning and commissioning. Genetic testing is employed in the United Kingdom in certain situations, which is also performed in accordance with current UKHCDO guidelines.

We have analyzed the databases for von Willebrand disease (VWD) from the hemophilia center for adult patients with bleeding disorders in South Australia. We define the prevalence of types of VWD to determine the proportion of who would be treated with factor (F) VIII/von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrate to prevent or control hemorrhage. In severe or moderately severe patients, we use plasma-derived FVIII/VWF concentrate, and for mild to severe cases, we use desmopressin plus tranexamic acid. There are 103 patients with VWF ristocetin (RCo) ≤50 IU/dL: 38 (37%) severe (VWF:RCo

In the Netherlands, specialized care for patients with a bleeding disorder, including hemophilia, von Willebrand disease (VWD), and allied disorders, is concentrated in 13 Hemophilia Treatment Centers. The Dutch Hemophilia Treaters Society, the Dutch Hemophilia Nurses' Society, and the Netherlands Hemophilia Patients Society collaborate to optimize management of patients with a bleeding disorder. A recently updated consensus guideline of hemophilia and allied bleeding disorders provide guidance on the current optimal diagnostic strategy and treatment of VWD. Genetic testing is not routinely performed in the Netherlands. Desmopressin (DDAVP) is the choice of treatment in VWD patients responsive to DDAVP, as determined by a test infusion. Coagulation factor concentrates are used in nonresponsive individuals, in case of a contraindication for DDAVP, or in type 2B and type 3 VWD. These concentrates are available for all patients in the Netherlands; however, these may only be administered in a Hemophilia Treatment Center or under the care of a Hemophilia Treatment Center. Recently a study on moderate and severe VWD (the Willebrand in Netherlands study) was initiated to obtain more insight on VWD diagnosis, treatment, and the burden of the disease.

In Canada, care for individuals with inherited bleeding disorders, including Von Willebrand disease, is provided by 26 tertiary care multidisciplinary Inherited Bleeding Disorders clinics geographically spread across the country. The Association of Hemophilia Clinic Directors of Canada, the Canadian Association of Nurses in Hemophilia Care, the Canadian Physiotherapists in Hemophilia Care, the Canadian Social Workers in Hemophilia Care, and the Canadian Hemophilia Society all collaborate to provide optimal management for patients with inherited bleeding disorders. The standards of care for these patients were explicitly laid out in a 2007 document published by the Canadian Hemophilia Standards Group (with representation from all of the groups just mentioned) entitled Canadian Comprehensive Care Standards for Hemophilia and Other Inherited Bleeding Disorders. Separate Canadian guidelines for the management of patients with Hemophilia and Von Willebrand disease also exist, focused on diagnosis, comprehensive care, assessment, and treatment.

Platelet-type von Willebrand disease (PT-VWD) is an autosomal dominant rare bleeding disorder characterized by hyperresponsive platelets. This inherent platelet function defect is due to a gain-of-function mutation within the GP1BA gene coding for the platelet surface glycoprotein Ib alpha protein, the receptor for the adhesive protein von Willebrand factor (VWF). The defect results in excessive and unnecessary platelet-VWF interaction with subsequent removal of the hemostatically efficient high molecular weight VWF as well as platelets from the circulation, leading to thrombocytopenia and bleeding diathesis. Patients with PT-VWD present with mild to moderate mucocutaneous bleeding, which becomes more pronounced during pregnancy and following aspirin ingestion or drugs that have antiplatelet activity. Laboratory testing shows low VWF:ristocetin cofactor and low or normal VWF:antigen and characteristically an enhanced ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination (RIPA). These laboratory features are also indicators of the closely similar and more common bleeding disorder type 2B VWD. Simplified RIPA mixing assays, cryoprecipitate challenge, and flow cytometry can differentiate between the two disorders. However, the gold standard is to identify mutations within the VWF gene (indicating type 2B VWD) or the platelet GP1BA gene (confirming PT-VWD). Treatment is based on making a correct diagnosis of PT-VWD where platelet concentrates instead of VWF/factor VIII preparations should be administered. A recent fairly large retrospective/prospective registry-based international study showed that PT-VWD is very rare, likely to be misdiagnosed as type 2B VWD or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, and represents 15% of type 2B VWD diagnoses.

In China, the care of patients with a bleeding disorder is not organized into designated centers with a national protocol. However, currently developed organizations of hematologists and hemophilia patients are beginning to ensure better diagnosis, treatment, and care of affected patients. The diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) in China is still at an early stage. Misdiagnosis of the disease is difficult to avoid, and there is a need to improve our current diagnostic strategy. Our data show that assessment of von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen levels is pivotal in ranking VWD clinical severity for replacement therapy. Treatment choices for VWD in China are currently limited to replacement therapy and antifibrinolytic drugs. Most VWD patients in China do not need replacement therapy. New phenotypic assays and genetic testing of VWF for research purposes have developed with results published in the Chinese medical literature in the last few years, and many are practical and feasible for diagnostic application. However, more efforts are needed for their widespread use for precise VWD diagnosis in China.

Little information is available on von Willebrand disease (VWD) in Iran. More than 900 patients with VWD are registered, but the real number of patients with VWD is likely to be larger. Fifteen hemophilia treatment centers in addition to 31 other academic centers are the main sites for the clinical management and treatment of VWD in Iran. All centers are staffed by specialists in the medical care of VWD. Epistaxis and menorrhagia are the most frequent clinical manifestations in Iranian patients with VWD. Von Willebrand factor/factor VIII concentrates, desmopressin, cryoprecipitates, and tranexamic acid are the main medications used routinely in Iranian patients, and they are administered based on the type of disease, the severity of bleeding, and sometimes for the prevention of bleeding during surgical procedures or delivery. It is hoped that the recent creation of a national registry for coagulation disorders and improvements in laboratory techniques will improve the diagnosis, national patients' registry, and management of VWD in Iranian patients and lead to gains in their quality of life in the near future.

New Zealand is a small country of two islands and 4 million people, of which 1 million reside in the South Island. Canterbury Health Laboratories provides laboratory services to the whole of South Island and lower parts of North Island. There are 155 Von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients in our South Island database, of which 17 have type 2 and 3 have type 3 VWD. A brief overview of diagnostic services for VWD being followed in our region is detailed in this article. We strive continually to advance the repertoire of diagnostic tests. We also present an analysis of our experience with a flow-based functional Von Willebrand factor assay. The VWD patients are managed by hemostasis team members, who also provide screening and educational input to affected families. The Haemophilia Foundation of New Zealand is an active patient support group providing education and support both directed individually and in the group setting, through residential educational camps.

This review focuses attention on some practical aspects of the relationship between thyroid disorders and hypocoagulability, as related to an impairment of hemostasis and fibrinolysis. An understanding of this topic in daily clinical practice is important given that the interaction between hemostatic abnormalities and thyroid disorders is still poorly recognized by the medical community. Even if the bleeding tendency is in general mild and may be reversed by restoration of an euthyroid state, severe hemorrhagic events may complicate the course of both hyper- and hypothyroidism, as precipitated by such conditions as thrombocytopenia, acquired von Willebrand syndrome, and acquired hemophilia. The pathogenesis of the hemostatic abnormalities resides in either the direct effect of thyroid hormones or some conditions in an autoimmune mechanism. Physicians and endocrinologists should pay close attention to both clinical hemorrhagic events in their patients as well as to any laboratory abnormalities identified by blood coagulation testing.

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is a rare bleeding disorder with laboratory findings similar to those for congenital von Willebrand disease (VWD). Unlike VWD, AVWS usually occurs in individuals with no personal or family history of bleeding. The prevalence of AVWS in the general population is unknown because data from large prospective studies of this syndrome are not available. Although AVWS is more frequently associated with lympho-myeloproliferative and cardiovascular disorders, it can also occur in solid tumors and in immunological and other miscellaneous conditions. Among these miscellaneous conditions, hypothyroidism has been associated with AVWS type 1 with a frequency of ~2 to 5%. In the 47 cases reported in the literature, the low VWF is apparently due to a reduction in its synthesis and/or secretion. Diagnosis of AVWS is based on assays measuring the level and activity of von Willebrand factor (VWF). These tend to be low, whereas factor VIII (FVIII) coagulant activity can be normal. In patients with AVWS associated with hypothyroidism, mucocutaneous bleeding episodes are the most frequent and can be managed with local therapy and/or systemic administrations of antifibrinolytic agents and desmopressin. VWF/FVIII concentrates have been used in only a few patients. The use of thyroid hormones can reverse this abnormality.

The diagnosis and functional characterization of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is challenging. There are inherent difficulties in both its identification and classification because of clinical uncertainty, the limitations in the test processes and test panels typically used by laboratories, and because the classification scheme does not always allow unequivocal assignment of any subtype. This article reviews current thoughts and alternatives to the classic approach of the classification and functional characterization of VWD. Of particular interest to this author is the utility of an extended core test panel that includes additional functional VWF assays, such as the collagen binding assay, and the potential for desmopressin (DDAVP) challenge to not only provide therapeutic information but also assist in the better characterization of individuals with defects or deficiencies in von Willebrand factor (VWF). The potential use of supplementary assays such as the PFA-100 and the VWF propeptide assay after DDAVP challenge is also worth noting.

The PFA-100 (platelet function analyzer) is a relatively new tool for the investigation of primary hemostasis. This article reviews the history of the PFA-100 and details its clinical utility in several settings. The PFA-100 was first introduced to us in 1995 in an issue of Seminars in Thrombosis And Hemostasis, which included data from a field trial headed by Dr. Eberhard Mammen. Since that time, the PFA-100 has featured in nearly 500 publications and some 35 reviews. The PFA-100 has potential utility in monitoring antiplatelet therapy (including aspirin) and as a screening tool for investigating possible von Willebrand disease (VWD) and various platelet disorders. The PFA-100 also has potential value for monitoring DDAVP (desmopressin) therapy in both VWD and functional platelet disorders. Most recent attention has focused on sensitivity to antiplatelet medication, where a new language has also emerged, with researchers talking about "aspirin resistance," "aspirin responsiveness," and "aspirin nonresponsiveness." Ultimately, the greatest strengths of the PFA-100 are its simplicity in use and excellent sensitivity to various hemostatic disturbances. However, because it is a "global" test system for primary hemostasis, this also creates a significant limitation because the PFA-100 is not specific for, nor predictive of, any particular disorder. However, used appropriately, the PFA-100 can be considered a worthwhile addition to hemostasis laboratories involved in the identification or therapeutic monitoring of primary hemostatic disorders. The potential future applications for this simple instrument are also briefly assessed.

von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a multimeric plasma protein that mediates platelet adhesion and aggregation at sites of vascular injury and also acts as a protective carrier of factor VIII. Although the acquired or inherited deficiency of VWF is associated with a bleeding tendency, there is increasing evidence that VWF also plays a pivotal role in thrombosis. The presence in plasma of unusually large VWF multimers, due to the congenital or acquired deficiency of the VWF-cleaving metalloproteinase ADAMTS13, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. In addition, high plasma levels of VWF have been associated with an increased risk of atherothrombosis. The current article reviews the literature and provides evidence for the two-faced character that VWF therefore represents.

Type 2B von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a qualitative type of VWD with a unique feature among VWD types, resulting from an increased binding of von Willebrand factor (VWF) to its platelet receptor glycoprotein 1b-alpha (GP1BA). This heightened responsiveness takes place in vivo without endothelial injury or shear stress induction, typically resulting in loss of the hemostatically most active high-molecular-weight VWF multimers and leading to a bleeding diathesis. This process also typically leads to clearance of platelets and thus usually mild thrombocytopenia. At least this describes the classic representation of type 2B VWD (i.e., the typical picture we have come to know since the description/classification of this disorder in the early 1990s). Over more recent years, several reports have described individual cases, groups of patients, and families diagnosed with type 2B VWD where this picture was not typical in one or more aspects. This review discusses type 2B-like disorders and sheds light on potential phenotypic modifiers that might be responsible for the variation encountered with the classic picture of type 2B VWD as well as the impact on the diagnostic certainty of type 2B VWD.

Platelet-type von Willebrand disease (PT-VWD) and type 2B von Willebrand disease (2B-VWD) have different etiologies although both present with a similar clinical bleeding and basic laboratory phenotype. Both PT-VWD and 2B-VWD represent gain-of-function mutations that lead to enhanced binding between plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) and its platelet ligand, glycoprotein Ib alpha (GP1BA). However, 2B-VWD results from a functionally abnormal VWF molecule arising from mutations in the VWF gene, whereas PT-VWD is caused by hyperresponsive platelets resulting from mutations in the platelet GP1BA gene. A definitive diagnosis of PT-VWD versus 2B-VWD is critical for treatment decisions (as differential therapies might be respectively required) and also for family counseling. However, laboratory discrimination of PT-VWD versus 2B-VWD is problematic because simple phenotypic testing will not permit their differentiation, and the more complex testing approaches that might permit their differentiation are rarely applied, or are perhaps poorly applied. Although differential identification of PT-VWD versus 2B-VWD can most definitively be achieved by identifying the gene defect at either the VWF or GP1BA loci, such tests are not commonly available, not always successful, and even if available and successful might not be readily available to serve time-critical treatment decisions. Accordingly, simple laboratory tools to enable discrimination of the two disorders would be a valuable addition to the test repertoire of the hemostasis laboratory. This article provides a review of PT-VWD-related literature and an overview of a phenotypic laboratory test process that should enable the effective identification of PT-VWD and its discrimination from 2B-VWD.

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is considered to be the most common inherited bleeding disorder. It is diagnosed after a clinical and physical review, with personal and familial evidence of (primarily mucocutaneous) bleeding, and confirmed by laboratory testing. The latter typically entails initial plasma testing of factor VIII coagulant (FVIII:C), von Willebrand factor (VWF) protein (antigen; VWF:Ag), and VWF function, which has classically been assessed using the ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) assay. More recent attention has focused on another functional VWF assay, the collagen binding (VWF:CB) assay, as a possible replacement for the VWF:RCo assay or as a supplementary test of VWF adhesive "activity." Additional laboratory testing can comprise a battery of confirmatory and VWD subtype assisting assays, including assessment of VWF:multimers. This review updates our knowledge of VWD diagnostics with a particular emphasis on the VWF:CB assay. There is good evidence now in place that an optimized VWF:CB assay can significantly reduce the diagnostic error rate otherwise arising from the use of a test panel restricted to including the VWF:RCo assay as the sole functional VWF assay. Nevertheless, the VWF:CB assay should not be used to wholly replace the VWF:RCo assay in phenotypic testing but rather as a supplementary assay. However, with some thought and justification, the VWF:CB assay can be used to partly replace the VWF:RCo assay in some "screening" applications and can also be used to abrogate the need to perform routine VWF:multimers in most test cases.

Plasma-derived factor concentrates are important in the management of von Willebrand disease (VWD). We review the current literature regarding pharmacokinetic studies of von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrates used to treat VWD. Using additional local experience of a crossover pharmacokinetic (PK) study comparing a currently licensed double virally inactivated concentrate, Biostate, with that of its single virally inactivated predecessor, AHF (High Purity), we propose that consideration now be given to the use of new and novel test parameters for future PK studies. In particular, we propose that an evaluation of VWF collagen binding (VWF:CB) using an assay confirmed to be sensitive to high-molecular-weight forms of VWF be used in all future studies in addition to standard parameters such as factor VIII coagulant (FVIII:C), VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), and ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo). We further propose the use of calculated ratios of VWF:RCo to VWF:Ag and VWF:CB capacity to VWF:Ag as a measure of delivered VWF "functionality." We also report some new data regarding assessment of VWF:multimers using standard procedures together with densitometry and a novel scoring system to support our proposals. We suggest that these test parameters may be useful in future PK studies to better assess and compare the potential utility and clinical efficacy of VWF factor concentrates for use as therapy for VWD.

Regular multilaboratory surveys of laboratories by the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program (QAP) have been conducted to assess proficiency in tests of hemostasis for the last 40 years. This article focuses primarily on specialized assays of hemostasis, for which surveys have been conducted for some 10 years. For von Willebrand disease (vWD) evaluations, a total of 47 plasma samples have been dispatched to survey participants, including representative samples from normal individuals plus all of the major vWD subtypes (i.e., types 1, 2A, 2B, 2M, 2N, and 3). These surveys have focused partly on the issue of diagnostic interpretive error rates associated with different assays and test panels. In this context, considerable improvement is seen when laboratories incorporate the vWF:collagen-binding assay into the test panel. Thrombophilia-associated tests assessed by the program and discussed in this review include activated protein c resistance, lupus anticoagulant, and deficiencies of protein C, protein S, and antithrombin. Other tests briefly reviewed here include factor assays and inhibitors, D-dimer, and heparin/anti-Xa assays. Anticardiolipin antibody and anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I antibody (aB(2)GPI) testing, assessed by the Immunology QAP, is also reviewed briefly, as are genetic tests associated with thrombophilic markers such as factor V Leiden and the prothrombin gene.

The aim of treatment of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is to correct the dual defect of hemostasis (i.e., the abnormal platelet adhesion due to reduced and/or dysfunctional von Willebrand factor [VWF] and the abnormal coagulation expressed by low levels of factor [F] VIII). Desmopressin acetate (DDAVP) is the treatment of choice for type 1 VWD because it can induce release of normal VWF from cellular compartments. Prospective studies on biological response versus clinical efficacy of DDAVP in VWD types 1 and 2 are in progress to explore its benefits and limits as a therapeutic option. In type 3 and in severe forms of type 1 and 2 VWD, DDAVP is not effective, and for these patients plasma virally inactivated concentrates containing VWF and FVIII are the mainstay of treatment. Several intermediate- and high-purity VWF/FVIII concentrates are available and have been shown to be effective in clinical practice (bleeding and surgery). New VWF products almost devoid of FVIII are now under evaluation in clinical practice. Although thrombotic events are rare in VWD patients receiving repeated infusions of concentrates, there is some concern that sustained high FVIII levels may increase risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism. Dosage and timing of VWF/FVIII administrations should be planned to keep the FVIII level between 50 and 150 IU/dL. Appropriate dosage and timing in repeated infusions are also very important in patients exposed to secondary long-term prophylaxis for recurrent bleedings.

Clinical management of von Willebrand disease (or von Willebrand disorder [vWD]) often involves factor replacement or desmopressin acetate (DDAVP) therapy to control (potential) bleeding. Laboratory monitoring involves testing patient samples prior to therapy and at discreet time points after therapy. Classical testing generally comprises assays for factor VIII:coagulant activity, von Willebrand factor (vWF):antigen and vWF:ristocetin cofactor activity. The PFA-100 (platelet function analyser) is a relatively new tool for the investigation of primary hemostasis, and studies have shown its potential utility in identifying both vWD and platelet disorders, and in monitoring DDAVP therapy in these patients. However, the PFA-100 has limited utility in monitoring factor replacement therapy. The collagen-binding activity (vWF:CB) assay is a relatively new functional vWF assay and studies have also shown its utility in identifying vWD, and in monitoring both DDAVP and factor replacement therapy in these patients. This review assesses the laboratory monitoring of therapy for vWD with a special focus on the combined potential utility of the PFA-100 and a vWF:CB assay sensitive for the presence or absence of large vWF multimers. This review should be of value to both hemostasis scientists and clinical specialists.