Search

Introduction: Ovotesticular disorder of sex development (OT-DSD) is a rare condition defined by concomitance of testicular tissue and ovarian tissue (containing follicles) in the same individual. In SRY-negative 46,XX OT-DSD, the presence of testicular tissue may be due to variations in NR5A1. Our aims were to search for NR5A1 variants in SRY-negative 46,XX OT-DSD patients and to perform a systematic review on the contribution of NR5A1 variations to 46,XX OT-DSD. Methods: Sanger sequencing of NR5A1 was performed in seven SRY-negative 46,XX OT-DSD patients: five simplex cases and two with another sibling with a 46,XX DSD. Systematic review of original studies on NR5A1 sequencing of 46,XX OT-DSD patients was performed according to PRISMA-P guideline. Case reports were selected for analysis of clinical features. Individuals with NR5A1-associated testicular DSD were not included. Results: Sanger sequencing of NR5A1 did not reveal pathogenic variants among our patients. Our cohort was included in this systematic review with seven other articles, totalizing fifty-six 46,XX OT-DSD patients investigated by Sanger or whole-exome sequencing. From them, three NR5A1 pathogenic variants were identified (5% of the cases). Clinical analysis of these 3 cases and 5 case reports revealed: predominance of ovotestis (13/16 gonads) and bilateral OT-DSD (5/8 cases). Conclusion: The etiology of most 46,XX OT-DSD cases remains elusive, highlighting the importance of a deeper molecular investigation.

Introduction: The aim of this retrospective study was to verify the association between the time of diagnosis and initial and final sex assignment in a disorder of sex development (DSD) diagnostic group, looking at the age of the patients at first visit, severity of genital ambiguity, and karyotype. Methods: The time of diagnosis was divided into 3 groups: before 2000, between 2000 and 2006, and after 2006. Data were categorized and analyzed using the χ2 test with α < 0.05. Results: A total of 567 cases were analyzed; 307 were assigned as male, 135 as female, and 125 remained undefined at the first visit. After clinical and laboratory evaluations, 369 patients were male and 198 were female. Neither initial nor final sex assignment proportions changed over time, but there were significant differences in the age at first visit, with referral occurring at an earlier age, as well as more severe genital ambiguity presentations, a higher proportion of sex chromosome aberrations, and a lower frequency of 46,XX DSD cases. This occurred both in the sample as a whole (567 cases) and in the group of 125 patients without definitive sex assignment at the first visit. The results were similar when only 284 patients aged less than 12 months at the first visit were analyzed. Discussion/Conclusion: Over time, there were no changes in sex assignment proportions, but there was an increased awareness of the need for early referral and changes in clinical, cytogenetic, and diagnostic aspects.

Introduction: NR5A1 is an essential transcription factor that regulates several target genes involved in reproduction and endocrine function. Pathogenic variants in this gene are responsible for a wide spectrum of disorders/differences of sex development (DSD). Methods: The molecular study involved Sanger sequencing, in vitro assays, and whole exome sequencing (WES). Results: Four variants were identified within the NR5A1 non-coding region in 3 patients with 46,XY DSD. In vitro analyses showed that promoter activity was affected in all cases. WES revealed variants in SRA1, WWOX, and WDR11 genes. Discussion/Conclusion: Evaluation of clinical and phenotypic significance of variants located in a non-coding region of a gene can be complex, and little is known regarding their association with DSD. Nevertheless, based on the important region for interaction with cofactors essential to promote appropriated sex development and on our in vitro results, it is feasible to say that an impact on gene expression can be expected and that this may be correlated with the DSD pathophysiology presented in our patients. Considering the number of cases that remain elusive after screening for the well-known DSD related genes, we emphasize the importance of a careful molecular analysis of NR5A1 non-coding region which is commonly neglected and might explain some idiopathic DSD cases.

In this study, we present 3 cases of Down syndrome (DS) associated with disorders/differences of sex development (DSD) and review the literature on this topic. Case 1: 1-year-old child with male genitalia and DS phenotype, 47,XX,+21 karyotype and testicular DSD. Case 2: 11-month-old child with male genitalia and few DS dysmorphisms, 45,X/47,XY,+21 karyotype, and mixed gonadal dysgenesis. Case 3: 4-month-old child with female genitalia and DS phenotype, 47,XY,+21 karyotype and XY complete gonadal dysgenesis. In the literature, among 188 patients, 107 (57%) had Klinefelter syndrome and 61 (33%) Turner syndrome, 12 (6%) had mixed gonadal dysgenesis, 2 (1%) had partial androgen insensitivity, 2 (1%) ovotesticular DSD, and the others had congenital adrenal hyperplasia, XY partial gonadal dysgenesis, XY complete gonadal dysgenesis, and complete androgen insensitivity (1 case each). A typical DS phenotype was found in all individuals of the revision, with the exception of one case, but DSD features were not always reported. In conclusion, the association of DS with sex chromosome DSD is the most frequently observed, whereas associations with 46,XX and 46,XY DSD is extremely rare.

Historically, the terms partial (PGD) and mixed gonadal dysgenesis (MGD) have been used to describe incomplete testicular differentiation in individuals with 46,XY or 45,X/46,XY karyotypes, respectively. However, it is currently unclear to what extent clinical features actually differ between these individuals. The aim of this study was to compare clinical, laboratory, and histological findings in these 2 groups. Patients with testicular dysgenesis seen in our service between 1989 and 2013 were selected. Sixty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Individuals with 46,XY and 45,X/46,XY karyotypes were compared regarding genital features, gonadal histology and function, growth, and associated conditions. Twenty-five had mosaicism with a 45,X cell line (MGD), while a 46,XY karyotype (PGD) was found in 36 cases belonging to 32 families. Mutations in NR5A1, WT1, and SRY genes associated with testicular dysgenesis were found in 12 families. There were no significant differences regarding parental consanguinity, degree of external androgenization, gonadal location, histology, and function, and associated conditions. However, in the MGD group, the presence of a uterus, lower birth weight and length, and short stature were more often observed. Therefore, the use of histological features to classify PDG and MGD should be abandoned and replaced by classification based on karyotype.

A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed in a DSD clinic at a tertiary service (University Hospital) to estimate the frequency of disorders of sex development (DSD) among men who seek medical care because of infertility. The sample included 84 men >20 years of age referred from 2010-2017 due to oligozoospermia or nonobstructive azoospermia of unknown etiology. Twelve cases (14%) were diagnosed as DSD, including Klinefelter Syndrome, 46,XX testicular DSD, and mild androgen insensitivity syndrome. Y chromosome microdeletions were detected in 2 patients. Among the remaining 70 cases there were patients with chromosome abnormalities which are not included in the DSD classification as well as rare NR5A1 variants of uncertain significance and hypergonadotropic hypogonadism and microorchidism in 46,XY subjects. In conclusion, the frequency of DSD in this study was 14%, consisting mainly of sex chromosome abnormalities but also 46,XX and 46,XY DSD. However, this figure may increase as further investigations are conducted in idiopathic cases with signs of primary testicular failure, which may present partial gonadal dysgenesis.