Search

Chlamydia trachomatis positivity and testing for both Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the United States have increased during pregnancy from 2010 to 2018, but many are not tested in accordance with guidelines., Background Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) case surveillance relies on reported positive laboratory results. Changes in reported cases may represent changes in testing practice or infection prevalence. This study evaluated changes over time for CT and NG positivity and testing rates of pregnant persons. Methods Prenatal testing results from persons aged 16 to 40 years tested by a national reference clinical laboratory were analyzed for CT and NG testing and positivity from 2010 to 2018 (n = 3,270,610). Results Testing rates increased among pregnant persons for CT (from 56.3% in 2010 to 64.1% in 2018, P < 0.001) and NG (from 55.6% to 63.2%, P < 0.001). Higher CT testing rates were found in Black non-Hispanic (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57–1.60) and Hispanic (AOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.18–1.20) persons. NG and CT testing rates were virtually identical. Significant increasing trends in CT positivity were observed for each age group studied (P < 0.001 for all): 16–19 (from 11.7% to 13.0%), 20–24 (from 6.4% to 6.7%), 25–30 (from 1.9% to 2.4%), and 31–40 years (from 0.76% to 0.92%). Black non-Hispanic persons had the highest positivity for CT (AOR, 2.52; 95% CI, 2.46–2.57) and NG (AOR, 5.42; 95% CI, 5.05–5.82). Conclusions Testing and adjusted positivity for both CT and NG among pregnant persons increased from 2010 to 2018. Higher testing rates were observed in Black non-Hispanic and Hispanic persons (even in persons younger than 25 years), suggesting some testing decisions may have been based on perceived risk, in contrast to many guidelines recommending screening all pregnant persons younger than 25 years.

Background We estimated the lifetime medical costs attributable to sexually transmitted infections (STIs) acquired in 2018, including sexually acquired human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Methods We estimated the lifetime medical costs of infections acquired in 2018 in the United States for 8 STIs: chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomoniasis, syphilis, genital herpes, human papillomavirus (HPV), hepatitis B, and HIV. We limited our analysis to lifetime medical costs incurred for treatment of STIs and for treatment of related sequelae; we did not include other costs, such as STI prevention. For each STI, except HPV, we calculated the lifetime medical cost by multiplying the estimated number of incident infections in 2018 by the estimated lifetime cost per infection. For HPV, we calculated the lifetime cost based on the projected lifetime incidence of health outcomes attributed to HPV infections acquired in 2018. Future costs were discounted at 3% annually. Results Incident STIs in 2018 imposed an estimated $15.9 billion (25th-75th percentile: $14.9-16.9 billion) in discounted, lifetime direct medical costs (2019 US dollars). Most of this cost was due to sexually acquired HIV ($13.7 billion) and HPV ($0.8 billion). STIs in women accounted for about one fourth of the cost of incident STIs when including HIV, but about three fourths when excluding HIV. STIs among 15- to 24-year-olds accounted for $4.2 billion (26%) of the cost of incident STIs. Conclusions Incident STIs continue to impose a considerable lifetime medical cost burden in the United States. These results can inform health economic analyses to promote the use of cost-effective STI prevention interventions to reduce this burden.

Background The purpose of this study was to estimate the cost of syphilis in the United States, in terms of the average lifetime direct medical cost per infection. Methods We used a decision tree model of the natural history of syphilis. The model allowed for numerous possible outcomes of infection, including treatment for syphilis at various stages, inadvertent treatment, and late syphilis outcomes in those who are alive and still infected 30 years after acquisition. Future costs were discounted at 3% annually. Model inputs, such as the cost and probability of each outcome, were based on published sources. The probabilities we applied yielded outcomes consistent with reported cases of syphilis by stage from national surveillance data and number of deaths due to late syphilis from national mortality data. Results The estimated, discounted lifetime cost per infection was $1190 under base case assumptions (2019 dollars). Treatment costs associated with late syphilis outcomes, such as cardiovascular syphilis, accounted for only $26 of the average lifetime cost per infection. Results were most sensitive to assumptions regarding the treatment cost per case of unknown duration or late syphilis. In the probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the 10,000 simulations of the lifetime cost per infection were $729 and $1884, respectively. Conclusions Our estimate of the lifetime cost per infection is about 50% higher than in a previous study, a difference due in large part to our higher cost assumptions for benzathine penicillin G.

BACKGROUND In 2010 to 2017, rates of reported chlamydia decreased among young Black women but increased for White women and all men. Because chlamydia case rates can be influenced by changes in prevalence, screening, and other factors, we compared chlamydia prevalence trends in a sentinel population with national case rate trends to understand potential drivers of case rate trends. METHODS Chlamydia prevalence was calculated annually among 16- to 24-year-old entrants to the National Job Training Program (NJTP) in 2010 to 2017. An expectation-maximization-based maximum likelihood approach was used to adjust for misclassification due to imperfect test sensitivity and specificity. Models were stratified by sex, age, and race/ethnicity. A statistically significant trend in prevalence was defined as nonoverlapping 95% confidence intervals comparing 2010 and 2017. Trends in chlamydia prevalence were compared with trends in case rates using percentage change over time; relative changes ≥10% were considered meaningful. RESULTS Among NJTP entrants in 2010 to 2017, chlamydia prevalence was stable for all Black women, whereas case rates decreased for adolescents (-12%) and were stable for 20- to 24-year-olds (-4%). Among adolescent White women, prevalence was stable, whereas case rates increased (+30%). For White women aged 20 to 24 years, prevalence increased +62% and case rates increased +43%. Trends in prevalence differed from trends in case rates for all subgroups of men. CONCLUSIONS Prevalence trends in this sentinel population differed from national case rate trends for Black women, White women, and men, suggesting potential decreased screening among Black women aged 16 to 19 years, increased prevalence among White women aged 20 to 24 years, and increased screening among men.