4 results on '"Looker KJ"'
Search Results
2. Chemsex and diagnoses of syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia among men who have sex with men in the UK: a multivariable prediction model using causal inference methodology.
- Author
-
MacGregor L, Kohli M, Looker KJ, Hickson F, Weatherburn P, Schmidt AJ, and Turner KM
- Subjects
- Adult, Chlamydia Infections epidemiology, Gonorrhea epidemiology, HIV Infections diagnosis, HIV Infections epidemiology, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis statistics & numerical data, Sexual Partners, Syphilis epidemiology, United Kingdom epidemiology, Chlamydia Infections diagnosis, Gonorrhea diagnosis, Homosexuality, Male statistics & numerical data, Recreational Drug Use statistics & numerical data, Sexual Behavior statistics & numerical data, Sexual and Gender Minorities statistics & numerical data, Syphilis diagnosis
- Abstract
Introduction: In the last decade diagnoses of most STIs have risen among men who have sex with men (MSM). Although a significant proportion of this is likely due to increased STI screening, understanding the role of behavioural drivers remains critical. We measure the associations between stimulant use to enhance and prolong sexual experiences (chemsex) and bacterial STI diagnoses in UK MSM, individually considering HIV-diagnosed MSM, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users and other MSM., Methods: We used the UK 2017-2018 European MSM Internet Survey data (n=9375). We constructed causal inference models using multivariable logistic regression, calculating adjusted OR (aOR) and 95% CI of the associations between participation in recent (≤12 months) exclusively dyadic or multipartner chemsex versus no chemsex and recent self-reported diagnoses of syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia., Results: Among MSM with an HIV diagnosis, 25% of users indicated recent multipartner chemsex, vs 28% of PrEP users and 5% of other MSM. Adjusting for age, ethnicity, UK birth, cis-trans status, sexual identity, education, settlement size and relationship status, participation in recent multipartner chemsex versus no chemsex was associated with greater odds of recent syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia diagnosis. aORs for recent syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia diagnoses were 2.6 (95% CI 1.7 to 4.1), 3.9 (95% CI 2.6 to 5.8) and 2.9 (95% CI 1.9 to 4.3), respectively, in HIV-diagnosed MSM; 1.9 (95% CI 1.1 to 3.3), 2.9 (95% CI 2.0 to 4.2) and 1.9 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.8), respectively, in PrEP users; and 4.0 (95% CI 2.3 to 6.9), 2.7 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.8) and 2.3 (95% CI 1.6 to 3.4), respectively, in other MSM. Conversely, exclusively dyadic chemsex had no significant associations with bacterial STI diagnoses among HIV-diagnosed MSM, only gonorrhoea (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.7) among PrEP users and syphilis (aOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 5.6) among other MSM., Discussion: Multipartner chemsex may drive the association between chemsex and bacterial STI diagnoses and thus should be the focus of future tailored chemsex interventions. Additionally, PrEP acceptability among MSM and particularly chemsex participants has generated an emergent group suitable for such interventions., Competing Interests: Competing interests: KMET has received funding through the University of Bristol from GlaxoSmithKline for work outside this research., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Comparing the characteristics of users of an online service for STI self-sampling with clinic service users: a cross-sectional analysis.
- Author
-
Barnard S, Free C, Bakolis I, Turner KME, Looker KJ, and Baraitser P
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chlamydia Infections diagnosis, Chlamydia Infections epidemiology, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Gonorrhea diagnosis, Gonorrhea epidemiology, HIV Infections diagnosis, HIV Infections epidemiology, Health Services statistics & numerical data, Humans, Logistic Models, London epidemiology, Male, Middle Aged, Sexually Transmitted Diseases epidemiology, Young Adult, Ambulatory Care Facilities statistics & numerical data, Diagnostic Self Evaluation, Internet statistics & numerical data, Sexually Transmitted Diseases diagnosis, Specimen Handling
- Abstract
Objectives: Online services for self-sampling at home could improve access to STI testing; however, little is known about those using this new modality of care. This study describes the characteristics of users of online services and compares them with users of clinic services., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected data on STI testing activity from online and clinic sexual health services in Lambeth and Southwark between 1January 2016 and 31March 2016. Activity was included for chlamydia, gonorrhoea, HIV and syphilis testing for residents of the boroughs aged 16 years and older. Logistic regression models were used to explore potential associations between type of service use with age group, gender, ethnic group, sexual orientation, positivity and Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) quintiles. We used the same methods to explore potential associations between return of complete samples for testing with age group, gender, ethnic group, sexual orientation and IMD quintiles among online users., Results: 6456 STI tests were carried out by residents in the boroughs. Of these, 3582 (55.5%) were performed using clinic services and 2874 (44.5%) using the online service. In multivariate analysis, online users were more likely than clinic users to be aged between 20 and 30 years, female, white British, homosexual or bisexual, test negative for chlamydia or gonorrhoea and live in less deprived areas. Of the individuals that ordered a kit from the online service, 72.5% returned sufficient samples. In multivariate analysis, returners were more likely than non-returners to be aged >20 years and white British., Conclusion: Nearly half (44.5%) of all basic STI testing was done online, although the characteristics of users of clinic and online services differed and positivity rates for those using the online service for testing were lower. Clinics remain an important point of access for some groups., Competing Interests: Competing interests: PB is a director of SH:24., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. A systematic review of the epidemiology and interaction of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2.
- Author
-
Looker KJ and Garnett GP
- Subjects
- Herpes Simplex virology, Humans, Odds Ratio, Prevalence, Herpes Simplex epidemiology, Herpesvirus 1, Human, Herpesvirus 2, Human
- Abstract
Objectives: To explore epidemiological evidence about the interaction of herpes simplex virus (HSV) 1 and HSV-2 infections., Methods: A systematic review was undertaken of published epidemiological studies describing the pattern of HSV-1 or HSV-2 by age, and the coincidence of the two viral infections., Results: In cross sectional studies the unadjusted odds of HSV-2 are greater in those with HSV-1 infection in study populations categorised as "low risk" (p = 0.06) and across European populations (p = 0.001). This was not evident in "high risk" populations or in the United States. This increased risk of HSV-2 in those with HSV-1 infection does not agree with the results of prospective studies where there is a non-significant trend towards a lower risk of HSV-2 infection associated with previous HSV-1 infection., Conclusions: "Low risk" and European populations have a relatively low HSV-2 seroprevalence and infection is more concentrated in those with characteristics putting them at high risk for both HSV-1 and HSV-2. This confounding could mask any protective effect of HSV-1, which is hinted at, but not demonstrated, in prospective and adjusted studies.
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.