Search

A host of power relations are structurally imposed upon the imprisoned and these produce vulnerabilities that require considerable energy and attention. This paper argues, however, that ‘vulnerable populations’ is a politically reactive legal category in the context of research with prisoners. In turn, this form of categorical vulnerability is often misaligned with ‘actually existing vulnerability’ or 'relational vulnerability' in the context of prison life. Substantive ethical, methodological and practical problems result from this misalignment, as I illustrate through the case of my research with former prisoners in Athens, Georgia. I seek to prove two claims in support of my central argument. First, actually existing vulnerability is fundamentally relational and it involves the researcher, the researched, collaborators, and (often distant) people and social structures that were not necessarily directly involved in the research process. Second, vulnerability is a spatially and temporally contingent process. The essay reviews the peculiar history by which prisoners came to be categorized as a ‘vulnerable population’ in the United States, in addition to recounting my first-hand experiences during the research process. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]