1. Centrality and Dimensionality of 14 Indicators of Mental Well-Being in Four Countries: Developing an Integrative Framework to Guide Theorizing and Measurement
- Author
-
Mohsen Joshanloo
- Subjects
Reductionism ,Sociology and Political Science ,Field (Bourdieu) ,media_common.quotation_subject ,05 social sciences ,Psychological intervention ,General Social Sciences ,050109 social psychology ,Latent variable ,Eudaimonia ,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) ,0502 economics and business ,Developmental and Educational Psychology ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Multidimensional scaling ,050207 economics ,Centrality ,Psychology ,Autonomy ,Cognitive psychology ,media_common - Abstract
The primary objective of this research is to develop an integrative framework for distinguishing and classifying well-being variables. Towards this end, rigorous data-descriptive methods are used to examine the centrality of well-being variables and to explore the underlying dimensions along which these variables differ. The study uses 14 well-being variables as postulated in the tripartite model of mental well-being, including variables from 3 clusters of hedonic, psychological and social well-being. Samples from Korea, Canada, Iran and the USA are used. Centrality is conceptualized and examined under a latent variable framework. Multidimensional scaling is used to examine the underlying dimensions in the structure of well-being variables. Results show that self-acceptance, environmental mastery and purpose in life are the most central variables, whereas the most peripheral variables are autonomy, social actualization and social coherence. Multidimensional scaling uncovered 2 dimensions underlying the well-being variables: “hedonic versus eudaimonic” and “personal versus social”, facilitating a dimensional understanding of well-being. The results contribute to building a consensus in the field of well-being to advance knowledge while avoiding reductionism. The findings have implications for creating, refining and broadening well-being theories, clarifying some of the conceptual and empirical confusions in the field, selecting well-being variables for different research purposes, developing new well-being scales and constructing well-being interventions.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF