Search

General practitioners provide treatment for the majority of people diagnosed as having a mental disorder in New Zealand, but much research suggests that they fail to diagnose many common mental disorders. This paper explores the issue of GP recognition of mental health problems through four discussion groups with GPs from the lower half of the North Island of New Zealand. GPs were asked to consider what they thought their role was in relation to mental health, what facilitated discussion of mental health issues in consultations and what could influence patients to disclose mental health problems. The analysis of the data collected drew on thematic and discourse analysis. Four key domains that had an impact on the consultation were identified, which were categorised as practice pressures, socio-cultural factors, the medico-legal framework and the consultation process. GPs employ a number of strategies to respond to the systemic and social issues influencing the consultation. This research suggests that GPs do recognise mental health problems in patients, but that a number of important factors result in the consultations not being labeled as mental health ones. The paper concludes by offering a framework for the mental health consultation that illustrates the systemic issues that GPs consider when making decisions about mental health consultations. Keywords: New Zealand; General practice; Mental health; Doctor-patient relationship

To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.10.022 Byline: Kevin Dew (a), Vera Keefe (b), Keitha Small (b) Keywords: Presenteeism; Absenteeism; Sickness absence; Occupational health; New Zealand Abstract: Presenteeism is a concept used to describe the phenomenon of working through illness and injury. This paper is based on interviews and focus groups undertaken at three different work sites in New Zealand: a small private hospital, a large public hospital and a small factory. The research suggests that presenteeism is a prominent phenomenon in the lives of workers at these different sites, but the way in which it is rationalised and the factors that foster presenteeism are quite distinct. Exploring the way in which presenteeism links to economic and social constraints and workplace cultures provides insights into these rationalisations. The powerful forces promoting presenteeism tempers the research community's concern with absenteeism. A presenteeism discourse needs to be more prominently articulated to oppose both the absenteeism discourse, and to moderate the views taken by some postmodernist theorists on choice in relation to health practices in workplace settings. Author Affiliation: (a) Department of Public Health, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, P.O. Box 7343, Wellington South, New Zealand (b) Te RApA' Rangahau Hauora a Eru PAmare, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, New Zealand

Acupuncture gained considerable attention in anglophone countries in the 1970s. As part of that popularity many medical practitioners became interested in the therapy and learned acupuncture techniques. A number of studies have indicated that medical practitioners were able to take up the practice of acupuncture without threatening the cultural authority of medicine so long as they limited the scope of its practice and redefined acupuncture concepts in Western biomedical terms. These analyses tend to present the medical profession as monolithic and emphasize a dichotomous relationship between biomedicine and alternative therapies such as acupuncture. This study examines the ways in which acupuncture has been represented in different medical forums, suggesting that in order to understand the relationships between biomedicine and alternative medicine we need to be more aware of the changing nature of these representations and their dependency upon the context of the representation. Rather than emphasizing a duality between orthodox medicine and alternative medicine, it is argued here that there are pluralities of medical and healing worldviews.

Presenteeism is a concept used to describe the phenomenon of working through illness and injury. This paper is based on interviews and focus groups undertaken at three different work sites in New Zealand: a small private hospital, a large public hospital and a small factory. The research suggests that presenteeism is a prominent phenomenon in the lives of workers at these different sites, but the way in which it is rationalised and the factors that foster presenteeism are quite distinct. Exploring the way in which presenteeism links to economic and social constraints and workplace cultures provides insights into these rationalisations. The powerful forces promoting presenteeism tempers the research community's concern with absenteeism. A presenteeism discourse needs to be more prominently articulated to oppose both the absenteeism discourse, and to moderate the views taken by some postmodernist theorists on choice in relation to health practices in workplace settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]