19 results on '"Gafni, A"'
Search Results
2. Attributing a monetary value to patients' time: A contingent valuation approach
- Author
-
van den Berg, Bernard, Gafni, Amiram, and Portrait, France
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. The influence of child abuse on the pattern of expenditures in women's adult health service utilization in Ontario, Canada
- Author
-
Tang, Betty, Jamieson, Ellen, Boyle, Michael, Libby, Anne, Gafni, Amiram, and MacMillan, Harriet
- Subjects
Health surveys -- Analysis ,Women -- Analysis ,Medical care, Cost of -- Analysis ,Mental illness -- Analysis ,Child abuse -- Analysis ,Sexual abuse -- Analysis ,Medical care -- Utilization ,Medical care -- Analysis ,Women -- Health aspects ,Health ,Social sciences - Abstract
To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.04.015 Byline: Betty Tang (a), Ellen Jamieson (a), Michael Boyle (a), Anne Libby (b), Amiram Gafni (c), Harriet MacMillan (a) Keywords: Child abuse; Health care expenditures; Canada; Health utilization; Women Abstract: Childhood maltreatment is a common and serious problem for women, particularly in relation to impairment in adulthood. To our knowledge, no system-wide study has addressed the influence of childhood maltreatment on the cost of these women's adult health service utilization. This paper examines this relationship. The 1990 Ontario Health Survey (OHS) gathered information regarding determinants of physical health status and the use of health services. The 1991 Ontario Mental Health Supplement (OHSUP) examined a variety of childhood experiences as well as the prevalence of psychiatric disorders from a sample of OHS respondents. These were province-wide population health surveys of a probability-based sample of persons aged 15 years and older living in household dwellings in Ontario. The OHSUP randomly selected one member from each participating OHS household to be interviewed regarding personal experiences and mental health. This analysis used data from women aged 15-64 who participated in both the OHS and OHSUP. Self-reported health service utilization was collected in four groups of women -- those who reported no history of child abuse, those with a history of physical abuse only, those who reported sexual abuse only, and those who reported both physical and sexual (combined) abuse. We hypothesized that a history of child abuse would result in greater adult health care costs. The results indicated that having a history of combined abuse nearly doubles mean annual ambulatory self-reported health care costs to $775 (95% CI $504-$1045) compared to a mean cost of $400 with no abuse (95% CI $357-$443). Median annual ambulatory self-reported health care costs were also increased in the combined abuse group, to $314 (95% CI $220-$429), compared to $138 (95% CI $132-$169) in those with no abuse. We conclude that child abuse in women is significantly associated with increased adult self-reported health care costs. Author Affiliation: (a) Offord Centre for Child Studies, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Ont., Canada L8N 3Z5 (b) Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Health Sciences Centre, USA (c) Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada L8N 3Z5
- Published
- 2006
4. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs): The silence of the lambda
- Author
-
Gafni, Amiram and Birch, Stephen
- Subjects
Medical care, Cost of -- Analysis ,Decision-making -- Analysis ,Health ,Social sciences - Abstract
To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.023 Byline: Amiram Gafni, Stephen Birch Keywords: Economic evaluation; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Decision rules; Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; Health care costs Abstract: Despite the central role of the threshold incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), or lambda (I'), in the methods and application of cost-effective analysis (CEA), little attention has been given to the determining the value of I'. In this paper we consider 'what explains the silence of the I''? The concept of the threshold ICER is critically appraised. We show that there is 'silence of the I'' with respect to justification of the value of ICER thresholds, their use in decision-making and their relationship to the opportunity cost of marginal resources. Moreover, the 'sound of silence' extends to both 'automatic cut-off' and more sophisticated approaches to the use of I' in determining recommendations about health care programs. We argue that the threshold value provides no useful information for determining the efficiency of using available resources to support new health care programs. On the contrary, the threshold approach has lead to decisions that resulted in increased expenditures on health care programs and concerns about the sustainability of public funding for health care programs without any evidence of increases in total health gains. To improve efficiency in resource allocation, decision-makers need information about the opportunity costs of programs. Author Affiliation: McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada
- Published
- 2006
5. Effective/efficient mental health programs for school-age children: a synthesis of reviews
- Author
-
Browne, Gina, Gafni, Amiram, Roberts, Jacqueline, Byrne, Carolyn, and Majumdar, Basanti
- Subjects
Mental health -- Research ,Social sciences -- Research ,Health ,Social sciences - Abstract
The prevalence of mental health problems, some of which seem to be occurring among younger cohorts, leads researchers and policy-makers to search for practical solutions to reduce the burden of suffering on children and their families, and the costs to society both immediate and long term. Numerous programs are in place to reduce or alleviate problem behaviour or disorders and/or assist positive youth development. Evaluated results are dispersed throughout the literature. To assess findings and determine common elements of effective children's services, a literature search was undertaken for evidence-based evaluations of non-clinical programs for school-age children. Prescriptive comments aim to inform service-providers, policy-makers and families about best practices for effective services such as: early, longterm intervention including reinforcement, follow-up and an ecological focus with family and community sector involvement; consistent adult staffing; and interactive, non-didactic programming adapted to gender, age and cultural needs. Gaps are identified in our understanding of efficiencies that result from effective programs. Policy implications include the need to develop strategies for intersectoral interventions, including: new financing arrangements to encourage (not penalize) interagency cooperation and, to ensure services reach appropriate segments of the population; replication of best practices; and publicizing information about benefits and cost savings. In many jurisdictions legislative changes could create incentives for services to collaborate on service delivery. Joint decision-making would require intersectoral governance, pooling of some funding, and policy changes to retain savings at the local level. Savings could finance expansion of services for additional youth. Keywords: Children; School-age; Mental health; Effective programs; Efficiency; Review
- Published
- 2004
6. Optimizing a portfolio of health care programs in the presence of uncertainty and constrained resources
- Author
-
Sendi, Pedram, Al, Maiwenn J., Gafni, Amiram, and Birch, Stephen
- Subjects
Medical care -- Research ,Medical care -- Analysis ,Health ,Social sciences - Abstract
Much research has been devoted to handling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. The current literature suggests summarizing uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis using acceptability curves or net health benefits. These approaches, however, focus only on uncertainty associated with costs and effects of the programs under consideration. In the real world, most decision-makers have to fund a portfolio of health care programs. Therefore, a more comprehensive approach would include in the analysis the uncertainty of costs and effects of all programs supported by the fixed budget. This paper extends the decision rule described by Birch and Gafni (J. Health Econ. 11(3) (1992) 279) within the context of a portfolio of programs when costs and effects are uncertain and resources constrained. Keywords: Cost-effectiveness analysis; Uncertainty; Sensitivity analysis; Portfolio; Resource constraints
- Published
- 2003
7. Shared treatment decision making in a collectively funded health care system: possible conflicts and some potential solutions
- Author
-
Sculpher, Mark, Gafni, Amiram, and Watt, Ian
- Subjects
Medical care decision-making authority (Law) -- Social aspects ,Conflict of interests (Agency) -- Analysis ,Medical ethics -- Standards ,Medical economics -- Ethical aspects ,Health ,Social sciences - Abstract
In recent years there has been a growth in the advocacy of shared decision making (SDM) between clinicians and patients as a way of practicing medicine. Although there is a range of perspectives on what SDM means, in essence it refers to greater involvement of the individual patient in deliberations about appropriate forms of clinical management. The patient's perception of the role of the doctor in SDM is crucial: for it to work successfully, the patient needs to be able to be confident that the doctor is focused on which treatment will generate the greatest benefit for them. However, the doctor also has responsibilities to others, in particular to other patients and potential patients within the collectively funded health care system. This dual responsibility can create a range of dilemmas for the clinician in the context of SDM: Should they inform patients about all effective treatments or just those that the health care system considers cost-effective? Do they risk losing patients from their books if they inform patients about their responsibilities to the health care system? SDM also raises questions about the wider principles of the health care system: Are its equity principles consistent with SDM? Should patients with a strong preference for an effective but non-cost-effective treatment be permitted to pay for it privately? This paper describes the nature of the conflicts that are likely to emerge if SDM diffuses within collectively funded health care systems, and considers a range of policy responses. It argues that the risk of conflict may be reduced by making a clear distinction between clinical guidelines (focusing on effectiveness) and system guidelines (focusing on cost-effectiveness). Keywords: Shared decision making; Cost-effectiveness; Collectively funded health care systems; Guidelines
- Published
- 2002
8. When the bough breaks: provider-initiated comprehensive care is more effective and less expensive for sole-support parents on social assistance
- Author
-
Browne, Gina, Byrne, Carolyn, Roberts, Jacqueline, Gafni, Amiram, and Whittaker, Susan
- Subjects
Ontario -- Health aspects ,Medical care, Cost of -- Research ,Child welfare -- Research ,Health ,Social sciences - Abstract
This 5-year study conducted in Ontario, Canada is designed to assess the effects and expense of adding a mix of provider-initiated interventions to the health and social services typically used in a self-directed manner by sole-support parents and their children receiving social assistance in a national system of health and social insurance. Results from a 2-year interim analysis show that providing social assistance families with proactive comprehensive care (health promotion, employment retraining, and recreation activities for children) compared to allowing families to fend for themselves in a self-directed manner, results in 15% more exits from social assistance within 1 year and substantial savings to society in terms of social assistance payouts. It is no more expensive to provide health and social services in a comprehensive fashion, and equivalent reductions in parent mood disorder and child behavior disorders, as well as equivalent increases in parent social adjustment and child competence levels were also observed. This study presents clear evidence that providing comprehensive care to social assistance recipients produces tremendous short- and long-term financial gains and societal benefits. Keywords: Single parents; Social assistance; Effectiveness; Cost; Provider-initiated
- Published
- 2001
9. The physician-patient encounter: the physician as a perfect agent for the patient versus the informed treatment decision-making model
- Author
-
Gafni, Amiram, Charles, Cathy, and Whelan, Tim
- Subjects
Physician and patient -- Models ,Medical care decision-making authority (Law) -- Models ,Informed consent (Medical law) -- Models ,Health ,Social sciences - Published
- 1998
10. Age, adjustment, and costs: a study of chronic illnesses
- Author
-
Watt, Susan, Roberts, Jacqueline, Browne, Gina, and Gafni, Amiram
- Subjects
Chronic diseases -- Care and treatment ,Medical care, Cost of -- Analysis ,Adjustment (Psychology) -- Analysis ,Aged -- Care and treatment ,Health ,Social sciences - Abstract
Much concern has been expressed about increasing health costs associated with an aging population. In relation to chronic conditions, this study demonstrates that cost seems to be a function of adjustment to the chronic condition rather than of age in and of itself. We know from previous work that people with poor psychosocial adjustment cost considerably more than do people who are either moderately or well adjusted and this study shows that older, poorly adjusted persons are no more costly than their younger counterparts. Key words - chronic illness, adjustment, cost, aged, illness behaviour
- Published
- 1997
11. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)
- Author
-
Charles, Cathy, Gafni, Amiram, and Whelan, Tim
- Subjects
Physician and patient -- Analysis ,Decision-making -- Evaluation ,Medical care decision-making authority (Law) -- Interpretation and construction ,Health ,Social sciences - Abstract
Shared decision-making is increasingly advocated as an ideal model of treatment decision-making in the medical encounter. To date, the concept has been rather poorly and loosely defined. This paper attempts to provide greater conceptual clarity about shared treatment decision-making, identify some key characteristics of this model, and discuss measurement issues. The particular decision-making context that we focus on is potentially life threatening illnesses, where there are important decisions to be made at key points in the disease process, and several treatment options exist with different possible outcomes and substantial uncertainty. We suggest as key characteristics of shared decision-making (1) that at least two participants - physician and patient be involved; (2) that both parties share information; (3) that both parties take steps to build a consensus about the preferred treatment; and (4) that an agreement is reached on the treatment to implement. Some challenges to measuring shared decision-making are discussed as well as potential benefits of a shared decision-making model for both physicians and patients. Key words - shared treatment decision-making, physician/patient communication
- Published
- 1997
12. Preferences for outcomes in economic evaluation: an economic approach to addressing economic problems
- Author
-
Gafni, Amiram and Birch, Stephen
- Subjects
Medical care -- Economic aspects ,Psychometrics -- Usage ,Medical economics -- Evaluation ,Health ,Social sciences - Abstract
In this paper we critically appraise the appropriateness and validity from an economic perspective of alternative preference-based approaches to measuring outcomes in economic evaluations of health care interventions. We describe the properties of an outcome measure for economic evaluation to make it compatible with the principles of economics when applied to the problem of resource allocation. We also describe the difference and similarities between the psychometric and the economic approaches for the measurement of outcome. Using these properties we critically appraise the use of QALY and HYE methods of measuring individual and social preferences for health outcome. We argue that the most advanced measure currently available that meets these required properties is the HYE. Because the HYE, unlike the QALY, has its foundations in utility theory under uncertainty, it neither assumes particular formulations of the individual utility function, nor is it incompatible with the principles of economics. As such it represents a further stage in the continuing development of methods for economic evaluation of health care programmes. Key words - economic evaluation, cost utility analysis, QALYs, utility theory
- Published
- 1995
13. Portfolio theory and the alternative decision rule of cost-effectiveness analysis: theoretical and practical considerations
- Author
-
Sendi, Pedram, Al, Maiwenn J., Gafni, Amiram, and Birch, Stephen
- Subjects
Social sciences -- Research ,Health ,Social sciences - Abstract
Bridges and Terris (Soc. Sci. Med. (2004)) critique our paper on the alternative decision rule of economic evaluation in the presence of uncertainty and constrained resources within the context of a portfolio of health care programs (Sendi et al. Soc. Sci. Med. 57 (2003) 2207). They argue that by not adopting a formal portfolio theory approach we overlook the optimal solution. We show that these arguments stem from a fundamental misunderstanding of the alternative decision rule of economic evaluation. In particular, the portfolio theory approach advocated by Bridges and Terris is based on the same theoretical assumptions that the alternative decision rule set out to relax. Moreover, Bridges and Terris acknowledge that the proposed portfolio theory approach may not identify the optimal solution to resource allocation problems. Hence, it provides neither theoretical nor practical improvements to the proposed alternative decision rule. Keywords: Cost-effectiveness analysis; Uncertainty; Portfolio theory
- Published
- 2004
14. Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model
- Author
-
Charles, Cathy, Gafni, Amiram, and Whelan, Tim
- Published
- 1999
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Evaluating health-related quality of life: an indifference curve interpretation for the time trade-off technique
- Author
-
Mehjrez, Abraham and Gafni, Amiram
- Subjects
Quality of life -- Evaluation ,Health -- Research ,Health status indicators -- Research ,Utility theory -- Usage ,Health ,Social sciences - Published
- 1990
16. The physician–patient encounter: The physician as a perfect agent for the patient versus the informed treatment decision-making model
- Author
-
Timothy J. Whelan, Cathy Charles, and Amiram Gafni
- Subjects
Information transfer ,Health (social science) ,Decision Making ,Breast Neoplasms ,Patient Advocacy ,Outcome (game theory) ,Patient advocacy ,Patient Care Planning ,Decision Support Techniques ,History and Philosophy of Science ,Informed consent ,Agency (sociology) ,Humans ,Medicine ,Patient participation ,Physician-Patient Relations ,Medical education ,Informed Consent ,business.industry ,Rubric ,Incentive ,Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ,Female ,Patient Participation ,business ,Social psychology - Abstract
Assuming a goal of arriving at a treatment decision which is based on the physician's knowledge and the patient's preferences, we discuss the feasibility of implementing two treatment decision-making models: (1) the physician as a perfect agent for the patient, and (2) the informed treatment decision-making models. Both models fall under the rubric of agency models, however, the requirements from the physician and the patient are different. An important distinction between the two models is that in the former the patient delegates authority to her doctor to make medical decisions and thus the challenge is to encourage the physician to find out the patient's preferences. In the latter, the patient retains the authority to make medical decisions and the physician role is that of information transfer. The challenge here is to encourage the physician to transfer the knowledge in a clear and nonbiased way. We argue that the choice of model depends among other things on the ease of implementation (e.g., is it simpler to transfer patient's preferences to doctors or to transfer technical knowledge to patients?). Also the choice of treatment decision-making model is likely to have an impact on the type of incentives or regulations (i.e., contracts) needed to promote the chosen model. We show that in theory both models result in the same outcome. We argue that the approach of transferring information to the patient is easier (but not easy) and, hence, more feasible than transferring each patient's preferences to the physician in each medical encounter. We also argue that because better "technology" exists to transfer medical information to patients and time costs are involved in both tasks (i.e. transferring preferences or information), it is more feasible to design contracts to motivate physicians to transfer information to patients than to design contracts to motivate physicians to find out their patients' utility functions. We illustrate our arguments using a clinical example of the choice of adjuvant chemotherapy versus no adjuvant chemotherapy for women with early stage breast cancer. We also discuss issues relating to the current realities of clinical practice and their potential implications for the way that economists model physician-patient clinical encounters.
- Published
- 1998
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)
- Author
-
Cathy Charles, Timothy J. Whelan, and Amiram Gafni
- Subjects
Physician-Patient Relations ,Focus (computing) ,Informed Consent ,Health (social science) ,Knowledge management ,business.industry ,Decision Making ,MEDLINE ,Context (language use) ,Models, Psychological ,Ideal (ethics) ,History and Philosophy of Science ,Patient Satisfaction ,Informed consent ,Key (cryptography) ,Conceptual clarity ,Humans ,Medicine ,Patient Participation ,Patient participation ,business ,Social psychology - Abstract
Shared decision-making is increasingly advocated as an ideal model of treatment decision-making in the medical encounter. To date, the concept has been rather poorly and loosely defined. This paper attempts to provide greater conceptual clarity about shared treatment decision-making, identify some key characteristics of this model, and discuss measurement issues. The particular decision-making context that we focus on is potentially life threatening illnesses, where there are important decisions to be made at key points in the disease process, and several treatment options exist with different possible outcomes and substantial uncertainty. We suggest as key characteristics of shared decision-making (1) that at least two participants-physician and patient be involved; (2) that both parties share information; (3) that both parties take steps to build a consensus about the preferred treatment; and (4) that an agreement is reached on the treatment to implement. Some challenges to measuring shared decision-making are discussed as well as potential benefits of a shared decision-making model for both physicians and patients.
- Published
- 1997
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Evaluating health related quality of life: An indifference curve interpretation for the time trade-off technique
- Author
-
Amiram Gafni and Abraham Mehrez
- Subjects
Health (social science) ,business.industry ,Welfare economics ,Context (language use) ,Time-trade-off ,Outcome (game theory) ,Empirical research ,History and Philosophy of Science ,Research Design ,Methods ,Quality of Life ,Econometrics ,Humans ,Medicine ,business ,Set (psychology) ,Preference (economics) ,Value (mathematics) ,Indifference curve - Abstract
A commonly used method of measuring cardinal preferences for the purpose of evaluating health related quality of life is the time trade-off (TTO) technique. The TTO technique, although offered as a substitute to the standard gamble (SG) technique, is not related in a general way to any existing behavioral theory. We suggest that in the context of value function theory the TTO technique is a method which enables us to identify different points on an individual's indifference curve in his evaluation space. Creating a formal theoretical foundation for the TTO technique enables us to better understand and interpret the outcome of our measurements. We show, for example, that the current way of calculating the value preference of a given health state assumes a very specific set of specific set of value functions. This assumption has not been validated in empirical studies and thus casts doubt upon the interpretation of these values as being the value preferences of individuals for these health states.
- Published
- 1990
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Evaluating health related quality of life: An indifference curve interpretation for the time trade-off technique
- Author
-
Mehrez, Abraham, primary and Gafni, Amiram, additional
- Published
- 1990
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.