Search

Host-plants may rarely leave their ancestral niche and in which case they tend to be surrounded by phylogenetically distant neighbours. Phylogenetically isolated host-plants might share few mutualists with their neighbours and might suffer from a decrease in mutualist support. In addition host plants leaving their ancestral niche might face a deterioration of their abiotic and biotic environment and might hence need to invest more into mutualist partners. We tested whether phylogenetic isolation of hosts from neighbours decreases or increases abundance and activity of their mutualists and whether mutualist activity may help to compensate deterioration of the environment. We study oak-hosts and their ectomycorrhizal fungi mutualists established in the litter layer formed by the phylogenetically closely or distantly related neighbourhood. We find that oaks surrounded by phylogenetically distant neighbours show increased abundance and enzymatic activity of ectomycorrhizal fungi in the litter. Moreover, oaks surrounded by phylogenetically distant neighbours also show delayed budburst but ectomycorrhizal fungi activity partly compensates this negative effect of phylogenetic isolation. This suggests decreased nutrient availability in a phylogenetically distant litter partly compensated by increased litter-degradation by ectomycorrhizal fungi activity. Most observed effects of phylogenetic isolation cannot be explained by a change in baseline soil fertility (as reflected by nutritional status of fresh oak litter, or soil microbial biomass and activity) nor by simple reduction of percentages of oak neighbours, nor by the presence of gymnosperms. Our results show that colonizing new niche represented by the presence of distantly related neighbours may delay plant phenology but may be supported by mycorrhizal mutualists. Studies on other host-plant species are required to generalize our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Microbial communities in soil are highly species-rich, recognition of which has led to the view that functional redundancy within communities may buffer many impacts of altered community structure on soil functions. In this study we investigated the impact of long-term (>50 years) exclusion of plant-inputs (bare-fallow treatment) on soil microbial community structure and on the ability of the microbial biomass to mineralise tracer additions of 13C-labelled plant-derived C-substrates. Exclusion of plant-inputs resulted in depletion of soil organic matter (SOM) and a reduction in microbial biomass size. The microbial community structure was also strongly affected, as indicated by the distinct phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) profiles in bare-fallow and grassland soils. Mineralisation of labile plant-derived substrates was not perturbed by the bare-fallow treatment. The incorporation of labile plant-derived C into PLFA biomarkers was found to differ between soils, reflecting the distinct community structures of the soils and indicating that these substrates were utilised by a broad range of microbial groups. In contrast, the mineralisation of recalcitrant plant-derived substrates was reduced in bare-fallow soil and the fate of substrate-derived C within PLFA biomarkers was, initially, similar between the soils. These results indicate that utilisation of these recalcitrant substrates was a function restricted to specific groups, and that exclusion of plant-derived inputs to soil had reduced the capacity of bare-fallow microbial communities to utilise this substrate type. Therefore, the study suggests that long-term selective pressure on microbial communities, resulting in altered community structure, may also result in altered functional attributes. This structure–function relationship was apparent for utilisation of recalcitrant plant-derived substrates, but not for the more widely distributed attribute of labile C-substrate utilisation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: If soil communities rely on plant-derived carbon, is biodiversity lost when this primary source is removed? Soil microbial and mesofaunal communities at the Rothamsted Highfield site were compared under a mixed grass sward, arable rotation and a section maintained as a bare-fallow for the past 50 years by regular tillage. Organic matter reserves have been degraded and microbial and mesofaunal numbers and mite diversity have declined in this unique bare-fallow site, where fresh carbon inputs have been drastically reduced. However, it supports a species-rich metabolically active bacterial community of similar diversity to that in soil maintained as grass sward. Thus in contrast to soil mesofauna, bacterial diversity (but not abundance) is apparently independent of plant inputs. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]