Search

As sleep problems are highly prevalent among university students and competitive athletes, and the application of commercial sleep technologies may be either useful or harmful, this study investigated the effects of a 2-week sleep self-monitoring on the sleep of physically active university students ( n   =  98, 21 ± 1.7 years). Two intervention groups used a free sleep app ( Sleep Score ; SleepScore Labs™, Carlsbad, CA, USA: n  = 20 or Sleep Cycle ; Sleep Cycle AB, Gothenburg, Sweden: n  = 24) while answering online sleep diaries. They used the app analysis function in week 1 and the 'smart alarm' additionally in week 2. As controls, one group answered the online sleep diary without intervention ( n   =  21) and another the pre-post questionnaires only ( n   =  33). Facets of subjective sleep behaviour and the role of bedtime procrastination were analysed. Multilevel models did not show significant interactions, indicating intervention effects equal for both app groups. Sleep Cycle users showed trends toward negative changes in sleep behaviour, while the online sleep diary group showed more, tendentially positive, developments. Bedtime procrastination was a significant predictor of several variables of sleep behaviour and quality. The results indicate neither benefits nor negative effects of app-based sleep self-tracking. Thus, student athletes do not seem to be as susceptible to non-validated sleep technologies as expected. However, bedtime procrastination was correlated with poor sleep quality and should be addressed in sleep intervention programmes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interestS. Jakowski and M. Stork declare that they have no competing interests., (© The Author(s) 2022.)