Search

Background: Core temperature changes during obstetric spinal anaesthesia are likely underestimated because monitoring is challenging and often not performed. This study aimed to describe the incidence and severity of perioperative hypothermia in patients undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia in a resource-limited setting. Methods: We performed a prospective observational study of parturients undergoing either elective or emergency caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia in a South African regional hospital. We used dual-sensor heat flux technology to monitor their core temperature during the perioperative period. The primary outcome was the incidence of clinically relevant hypothermia (defined as core temperature decrease from baseline of > 1 °C) following spinal anaesthesia. Smoothing splines were used to estimate maximum changes in core temperature. Results: We included 166 patients in our analysis. A decrease of > 1 °C occurred in 49% of participants (95% CI 40-63%) while hypothermia (temperature < 36 °C) occurred in 67% (49-78%). Discharge from recovery room with core temperature < 35 °C occurred in 26% (20-34%) of the participants. There was a higher incidence of vomiting in those participants who experienced temperature decreases of > 1 °C (18% vs 6%, p = 0.03). Conclusion: In this resource-constrained environment, clinically relevant hypothermia during obstetric spinal anaesthesia occurred in half of participants. Hypothermia was often severe and participants did not recover by the time of discharge from anaesthesia care. Monitoring of a patient's core temperature should be a standard of care, and further research into the clinical impact of perioperative hypothermia and warming strategies in these settings is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite numerous guidelines on perioperative temperature management, perioperative hypothermia remains common. Prewarming to prevent redistribution hypothermia is supported by evidence, but not widely practised. We investigate the measurement of preoperative mean body temperature as a potential tool for individualising the practice of prewarming. Methods: We hypothesised that patients who experience intraoperative hypothermia have a lower preoperative mean body temperature. A longitudinal study was conducted in adult patients presenting for ophthalmological surgery under general anaesthesia, to describe the relationship between the incidence of hypothermia within the first hour of anaesthesia and preoperative mean body temperature. Results: Sixty-five patients were enrolled. Twelve participants (18%) presented to the operating theatre hypothermic (core temperature < 36.0 °C). A further 28 (43%) became hypothermic during the procedure. All hypothermia events occurred within 60 minutes after induction of anaesthesia, and half of the events occurred within 19 minutes. The difference in preoperative mean body temperature between those with and without intraoperative hypothermia was only -0.2 °C (95% CI -0.4, 0.1). This is neither clinically relevant nor statistically noteworthy. In Cox proportional hazards analysis, BMI and ASA status compounded the observed association between preoperative mean body temperature and the incidence of intraoperative hypothermia. A higher BMI and ASA are associated with a lower incidence of hypothermia. Conclusion: We conclude that intraoperative hypothermia is common and occurs early after induction of anaesthesia. We observed no useful difference in preoperative mean body temperature to help distinguish between patients who become hypothermic and those who do not. Without a useful risk prediction tool, a generic approach to prewarming remains appropriate. Preoperative screening for pre-existing hypothermia should be practised, even in cases considered as low risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In Africa, maternal mortality after caesarean delivery is 50 times greater than in high-income countries. In South Africa, more than 50% of anaesthesia-related maternal mortality is attributed to failure to protect the airway. We implemented an obstetric airway management registry, to facilitate future improvements in management and outcomes. Methods: A prospective electronic registry was established at three obstetric sites in Cape Town, recording airway management for all general anaesthetics from 20 weeks gestation to seven days post-partum. Perioperative descriptive data are entered using a web-based smartphone-enabled platform. To quantify the reliability of capture, we compared the first 200 records in the registry to theatre logbooks. We used summary statistics to describe our obstetric anaesthesia population, and details relevant to airway management. Results: The first 200 cases were recorded from September 2018 to January 2019. According to theatre logbooks, this represented 80% of cases performed. Major indications for general anaesthesia included severe fetal distress/bradycardia (21%), failed neuraxial technique (19%), coagulopathy (19%), and abnormal placentation (12%). A third of patients had hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and 6% had imminent/confirmed eclampsia. Forty per cent were in active labour. On airway assessment, Mallampati grade was 3 or 4 in 29% of patients, and mouth opening, thyromental distance and mandibular protrusion limited in 10%, 8% and 8% respectively. Cormack-Lehane grade IIb and III views were encountered in 6% and 2% respectively, with no grade IV views. Desaturation below 90% occurred in 12% of patients. There were two cases (1%) of failed intubation with supraglottic airway rescue, and no emergency surgical airways performed. Conclusion: An obstetric airway management registry was successfully implemented. Clinically significant hypoxaemia occurred commonly during general anaesthesia, with a high incidence of difficult intubation predictors and desaturation. The registry will guide research aimed at improving safety during general anaesthesia in obstetrics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]