1. Handwritten word preprocessing for database adaptation
- Author
-
Laurence Likforman-Sulem, Chafic Mokbel, Cristina Oprean, Laboratoire Traitement et Communication de l'Information (LTCI), Télécom ParisTech-Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and University of Balamand - UOB (LIBAN)
- Subjects
Normalization (statistics) ,word preprocessing ,Computer science ,Speech recognition ,Normalization (image processing) ,02 engineering and technology ,computer.software_genre ,01 natural sciences ,[INFO.INFO-AI]Computer Science [cs]/Artificial Intelligence [cs.AI] ,010309 optics ,Set (abstract data type) ,0103 physical sciences ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,Preprocessor ,Handwritten word recognition ,Training set ,Database ,business.industry ,[INFO.INFO-WB]Computer Science [cs]/Web ,[INFO.INFO-MM]Computer Science [cs]/Multimedia [cs.MM] ,Pattern recognition ,[INFO.INFO-TT]Computer Science [cs]/Document and Text Processing ,Data set ,database adaptation ,Handwriting recognition ,[INFO.INFO-IR]Computer Science [cs]/Information Retrieval [cs.IR] ,[INFO.INFO-TI]Computer Science [cs]/Image Processing [eess.IV] ,Test set ,Word recognition ,020201 artificial intelligence & image processing ,Artificial intelligence ,business ,computer ,Word (computer architecture) - Abstract
International audience; Handwriting recognition systems are typically trained using publicly available databases, where data have been collected in controlled conditions (image resolution, paper background, noise level, etc.). Since this is not often the case in real-world scenarios, classification performance can be affected when novel data is presented to the word recognition system. To overcome this problem, we present in this paper a new approach called database adaptation. It consists of processing one set (training or test) in order to adapt it to the other set (test or training, respectively). Specifically, two kinds of preprocessing, namely stroke thickness normalization and pixel intensity normalization are considered. The advantage of such approach is that we can re-use the existing recognition system trained on controlled data. We conduct several experiments with the Rimes 2011 word database and with a real-world database. We adapt either the test set or the training set. Results show that training set adaptation achieves better results than test set adaptation, at the cost of a second training stage on the adapted data. Accuracy of data set adaptation is increased by 2% to 3% in absolute value over no adaptation.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF