Search

Background: This was a retrospective audit, with the aims being to (1) record the use of antibiotics; (2) establish the prevalence of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (AAD) and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD); and (3) assess if there was any seasonal variation in antibiotic use and incidence of AAD., Methods: The study was performed at a single spinal cord injury (SCI) centre in the UK. Data were collected using a standardised questionnaire during October 2014 to June 2015. We define AAD as two or more watery stools of type 5, 6 or 7 (Bristol stool scale) over 24 h., Results: Three-hundred-and-nineteen adults (mean age: 55.9 years, 29.2% female) with SCI (58.2% tetraplegia; 43.7% complete SCI) were included. Of 70 (21.9%) patients on antibiotics, the top three indications for antibiotics were urinary-tract infections, infected pressure ulcers and other skin infections. Seventeen of 78 (21.8%) developed AAD and three of 319 (0.94%) developed CDAD. AAD was more common in the summer season than in spring, autumn and winter (47.1%, 10.0%, 10.0%, 23.8%, P=0.025). AAD was associated with older adults greater than 65 years (70.6% vs 23.8%, P=0.007). Polypharmacy and the summer season were identified as independent predictors for AAD., Conclusion: This survey found that AAD is common in SCI patients and may be a risk factor for a poorer outcome and increased hospital costs. A multicentre study is underway to establish the incidence and risk factors for AAD.

Objectives: The present study was undertaken to review the service provision in spinal cord injury (SCI) centres (SCICs); to establish and compare how much time dietitians spend in direct and indirect contact with patients; and to document current nutritional screening practices., Methods: All 12 SCICs in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland were surveyed by a postal questionnaire in April 2014. Data collected included the number of whole-time-equivalent (WTE) staff available, whether a nutrition team was present and the use of nutrition screening tools. A work sampling tool was used to capture dietetic activity for a period of 1 week., Results: Eight (66.7%) SCICs responded (390/531 of total SCI beds) and the average numbers of patients per WTE staff, including consultants, nurses, dietitians, physiotherapists, occupational therapists were recorded. Six out of eight SCICs used a validated nutritional screening tool. Thirty-two work sampling tools were analysed, revealing that spinal dietitians spend 39.1% of the working day in direct patient-related activities. Staffing levels varied and were below clinical recommendations in six out of eight SCICs., Conclusion: The resources allocated to nutritional care in SCICs appear to be varied and limited. This suggests malnutrition may continue to be under-recognised and under-treated. To address the complex nutritional needs of this special population group there is a clear need to establish staffing level for dietitians. Information collected from the present study could contribute to the supply analysis of a future workforce planning exercise in SCIC dietetic service.

Objective: To (1) examine the opinions of medical staff working in spinal cord injury (SCI) centres (SCICs); (2) evaluate their knowledge, attitudes and practices towards obesity prevention and management; (3) report the number of beds and dietitians available at each SCIC., Methods: A 37-item questionnaire was sent to 23 SCICs in the UK, the Netherlands, Belgium and the Republic of Ireland between September 2012 and January 2013., Results: Eighteen SCICs returned the questionnaires for analysis. All respondents stated that they had an interest in obesity treatment but only 2.3% of the respondents received training in obesity management. Sixty-one percent of staff did not consider body mass index (BMI) to be appropriate for use in SCI patients and subsequently less than half of the respondents use BMI routinely. The majority of respondents reported that they are confident in dealing with overweight (74.5%) and obese (66.1%) SCI adults, less than half (44.1%) are confident in treating overweight and obese SCI children. Respondents also indicated the need for nationally adopted guidelines and a lack of physical activity provision. There were 17.5 whole-time equivalent (WTE) dietitians recorded in 22 SCICs, equivalent to 47.8 beds per WTE dietitians (range 10-420). Non-UK SCIC dietitians are significantly better resourced than in UK SCICs (beds per WTE dietitian: 36 vs 124, P=0.035)., Conclusion: Medical staff expressed the need to participate in obesity prevention and management. Appropriate training should be considered for all medical staff and the development of specific weight management guidelines and dietetic provision should be considered.

Objectives: To validate the Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Paediatrics (STAMP) in paediatric spinal cord injuries (SCIs) patients admitted to the tertiary SCI centre., Methods: children's baseline clinical data, anthropometric measurements and STAMP score were assessed on admission. The validity of STAMP was assessed by (i) comparison with a full dietetic assessment (criterion validity); (ii) comparison with generic paediatric screening tools: the Paediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS; concurrent validity); and (iii) completion of an additional STAMP to assess inter- and intra-rater reliability. The agreement was assessed using Cohen's κ-statistics., Results: Fifty-one children were screened by STAMP. The prevalence of undernutrition risk was 58.8%. STAMP had moderate agreement with dietitian assessment (κ: 0.507) and a fair agreement with PYMS (κ: 0.314). The STAMP had substantial reliability (inter-rater reliability: κ: 0.752; intra-rater reliability: κ: 0.635). When compared with dietetic assessment as a reference standard, STAMP had a sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 66.7% and an overall agreement of 76.5%., Conclusion: The present study shows that undernutrition is common in children with SCI. The STAMP is an acceptable (valid and reliable) tool to identify paediatric SCI patients at risk of undernutrition.

Study Design: A single centre survey., Objectives: The objective of this study is to (1) assess patients' food intake and (2) measure satisfaction with current food provision, as judged by patients and by stakeholders (medical and nursing staff, managers and catering staff)., Methods: Standardised questionnaires were used to record food intake over a 24-h period, and to evaluate the quality, ordering, delivery and overall acceptability of food provided., Results: The food intake of 67 patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) was recorded (64% response rate) and 166 evaluations (50% response rate) were returned. Twenty-nine patients (48%) consumed three full meals a day, 17 (26%) received oral nutritional supplements, 22 (34%) received vitamin/mineral supplements, and 23 (35%) required assistance to eat. Some patients and stakeholders expressed satisfaction with the current food provision: taste good: 25 versus 17% (for patients and stakeholders, respectively); appropriate texture: 22 versus 21%; appropriate temperature: 55 versus 72% (P = 0.002); well presented: 43 versus 28%; good choice: 49 versus 59%; received meal ordered: 65 versus 37% (P < 0.001); meal served on time: 71 versus 58%; and no interruption during mealtimes: 62 versus 46%. Principal component analyses of item scores identified three main factors (food quality, food presentation and food delivery (logistics)., Conclusion: The present study identified some areas where there appeared to have been improvement in SCI hospital catering, but with much still to be achieved. Hospital-catering systems should be tailored to meet the demands of the different patient groups to optimise nutritional intake. Periodic quality control is essential to meet recommendations and patients' expectations.

Study Design: A single centre survey., Objectives: To test: (i) awareness of nutrition screening tools and related care plans and; (ii) nutrition knowledge of doctors, nurses and dietitians working in spinal cord injuries (SCI) centres., Methods: The 14-item questionnaire was sent to 102 nurses, 17 doctors and 15 dietitians working in UK SCI centres during January-March 2010., Results: Sixty-two (46.5%) questionnaires were completed and returned for analysis. The present audit demonstrated that awareness of the need for nutritional screening is good: 83% of staff reported that they are aware there is a nutrition screening tool. This audit also demonstrated areas of poor knowledge, such as calorie content of intravenous fluids, indicators of malnutrition, and choice of nutritional support in malnourished patients. All doctors, but only 38% of nurses, knew how to calculate body mass index. Surprisingly, nearly half (49%) of the participants thought that at least 20% weight loss was required to indicate malnutrition. This high-perceived cut-off point suggests that malnutrition is likely to continue to be undetected and unmanaged. The overall scores (median) showed clear differences in nutritional knowledge between groups (median: dietitians 92.8%; doctors 53.5%; nurses 35.7; P<0.01). This suggests that dietitians could have an important role in training healthcare professionals about nutrition., Conclusion: This study highlights the need for further education in SCI medicine in order to improve the efficacy of feeding and nutrition therapy for SCI patients.

Study Design: A multi-centre, cross-sectional survey., Objectives: To establish and compare the resources allocated against existing national standards, and to document current nutritional screening practices., Setting: Spinal cord injury centres (SCICs) in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland., Methods: After obtaining research ethics committee approval, 12 SCICs in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland were surveyed by a postal questionnaire. Data collected included the number of whole time equivalent (WTE) staff available, whether a nutrition team was present and the use of nutritional screening tools in the SCIC., Results: Eleven (92%) SCICs responded. In total there were 482 allocated beds, and the average numbers of patients per WTE staff (s.d.), including consultants, nurses, dietitians, physiotherapists, occupational therapists and psychologists, were recorded. Eight centres used a nutritional screening tool, and only two centres had a clinical nutrition team., Conclusion: The resources allocated to nutritional care in SCICs appear to be very limited. This suggests that malnutrition will continue to be under-recognised and under-treated. There is a clear need for additional resources to address the nutritional needs of this special population group. Each SCIC should ensure regular access to nutritional advice, and the establishment of local nutrition support teams should be a priority.

Background: Data on the prevalence of malnutrition in paediatric patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) are limited. The present study aimed to establish the risk of (i) under-nutrition by using the Screening Tool for Assessment of Malnutrition in Paediatrics: STAMP (score ≥2) and (ii) over-nutrition by body mass index (BMI) centile (≥91st: overweight; ≥98th: obese)., Methods: After obtaining informed consent, a standardized questionnaire was used to collect baseline demographic data and nutrition risk score; BMI was measured and routine blood biochemistry was reviewed in every child (>6 months and <18 years) admitted to the SCI centre., Results: Sixty-two children (mean age, 11.4 years; s.d., 4.9; median, 13 years; interquartile range, 7.8-15.6, 39.4% female) with SCI (46.5% tetraplegia, 53.4% complete SCI) were assessed. Prevalence of over-nutrition was high (BMI centile ≥91st, 41.1%; ≥98th, 25.5%). Under-nutrition risk was 47.1% (STAMP ≥2). Only 60% of these 'at risk' patients were referred for further nutritional assessment. Associated phenomena included previous intensive care (55.6 versus 20.8%, P<0.05), mechanical ventilation (58.3 versus 18.2%, P<0.01) and past need for artificial nutrition support (75 versus 12.8%, P<0.01)., Conclusions: Both over- and under-nutrition appear common in children with SCI. Our data indicate, furthermore, that children at nutritional risk are under-managed. Future research is needed to complete the validation of the screening tools and to determine how effective intervention can be ensured.