Search

Study Design: A prospective, time series design.Objective: The purpose of this study is two-fold: firstly, to investigate the impact of altered cervical alignment and range of motion (ROM) on patients' self-reported outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and secondly, to comparatively differentiate the influence of single- and two-level ACDF on the cervical ROM and adjacent segmental kinematics up to 12-month postoperatively.Summary Of Background Data: ACDF is one of the most commonly employed surgical interventions to treat degenerative disc disease. However, there are limited in vivo data on the impact of ACDF on the cervical kinematics and its association with patient-reported clinical outcomes.Methods: Sixty-two patients (36 males; 55.63 ± 11.6 yrs) undergoing either a single- or consecutive two-level ACDF were recruited. The clinical outcomes were assessed with the Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Radiological results included cervical lordosis, global C2-C7 ROM, ROM of the Functional Spinal Unit (FSU), and its adjacent segments. The outcome measures were collected preoperatively and then at 3, 6, and 12-month postoperatively.Results: A significant reduction of both VAS and NDI was found for both groups from the preoperative to 3-month period (P < 0.01). Pearson correlation revealed no significant correlation between global ROM with neither VAS (P = 0.667) nor NDI (P = 0.531). A significant reduction of global ROM was identified for the two-level ACDF group at 12 months (P = 0.017) but not for the single-level group. A significant interaction effect was identified for the upper adjacent segment ROM (P = 0.024) but not at the lower adjacent segment.Conclusion: Current study utilized dynamic radiographs to comparatively evaluate the biomechanical impact of single- and two-level ACDF. The results highlighted that the two-level group demonstrated a greater reduction of global ROM coupled with an increased upper adjacent segmental compensatory motions that is independent of patient-perceived recovery.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design. Prospective cohort study. Objective. To evaluate the postoperative responsiveness of the Chinese versions of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) in a cohort of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Summary of Background Data. We have recently completed the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of a Chinese version of JOACMEQ. However, the postoperative responsiveness of the Chinese JOACMEQ and how it compares with the more commonly used NDI remain undetermined. Methods. Forty-five patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical decompression were recruited. All patients completed the Chinese JOACMEQ and the NDI preoperatively and again at 3-month follow-up together with an 11-point Global Rating of Change scale. Patients were dichotomized either as "Improved" or "Stable" on the basis of Global Rating of Change. Paired t test, standardized effect sizes, and Guyatt responsiveness index were used to determine internal responsiveness. External responsiveness was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the minimal clinically important change was determined as the optimal cutoff point for patient discrimination anchor-based on Global Rating of Change classifi cation. Results. Bladder function and quality of life (QOL) domains ( P < 0.03) of the JOACMEQ and the NDI ( P = 0.004) reached statistically significant difference with the paired t test. After the dichotomization, the standardized effect size was strong for the QOL domain in the improved group (0.85) and the Cervical spine function (0.97) in the stable group, respectively. Based on the Guyatt responsiveness index, strong responsiveness was found for the Bladder function (0.88) and QOL (0.76) domains of the JOACMEQ and moderate responsiveness (0.55) for the NDI. The Bladder function (area = 0.82; minimal clinically important change = 6) and QOL (0.83; minimal clinically important change = 8.5) also produced largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Conclusion. Bladder function and QOL domains of the JOACMEQ seem to demonstrate the strongest postoperative responsiveness and thus may be more appropriate than NDI when attempting to determine treatment efficacy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design. Translation and psychometric testing of a questionnaire. Objective. To adapt the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) cross- culturally to Chinese language and to investigate the psychometric properties of the translated Chinese JOACMEQ. Summary of Background Data. The recently developed JOACMEQ is a self-reported questionnaire used to assess the severity of the cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Despite its acceptance in the literature, the JOACMEQ has not been translated and validated for Chinese-speaking patients. Methods. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original JOACMEQ was performed according to published guidelines. A total of 105 patients with a predominant complain of neck pain that included but not limited to patients with a clinically confirmed cervical spondylotic myelopathy were included. Psychometric testing of the responses included construct validity (factor analysis), internal consistency (Cronbach α), test-retest reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient), and concurrent validity (Spearman ρ). The discriminatory power of differentiating those with myelopathy from those without was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and with the optimal cutoff points determined. Results. Construct validity testing revealed a comparable factorial structure of the Chinese JOACMEQ with the original JOACMEQ. The Cronbach α of the Chinese JOACMEQ was 0.88, indicating good internal consistency. Good to excellent test-retest reliability was demonstrated for all 5 domain scores (intraclass correlation coefficient range = 0.79-0.90). A significant strong association between the Chinese Neck Disability Index and the quality of life domain of the Chinese JOACMEQ (Spearman ρ = -0.76, P < 0.01 ) was identified. The upper and lower extremity function domain scores were found to be significant, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve found to be 0.75 {P = 0.04) and 0.82 (P = 0.02), respectively. Conclusion. The results indicated that the Chinese JOACMEQ successfully retained the psychometric properties of the original JOACMEQ and support the usefulness of the Chinese JOACMEQ as an appropriate supplementary diagnostic and outcome measure for Chinese patients suspected of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]