Search

Background Context: Central cord syndrome (CCS) is a common cause of incomplete spinal cord injury. However, to date, national trends in the management and mortality after CCS are not fully understood., Purpose: To analyze how patient, surgical, and institutional factors influence surgical management and mortality after CCS., Study Design: A retrospective cohort analysis., Patient Sample: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for records of patients with a diagnosis of CCS from 2003 to 2010., Outcome Measures: They included in hospital mortality and surgical management, including anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF), and posterior cervical decompression (PCD)., Methods: Using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes, patient records with a diagnosis of CCS from 2003 to 2010 were selected from the NIS database and sorted by inpatient mortality and surgical management. Demographic information (age, gender, and race) and hospital characteristics were evaluated with χ(2)-tests for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables. Multivariate logistic regression models controlled for confounding., Results: In this sample of 16,134 patients, a total of 39.7% of patients (6,351) underwent surgery. ACDF was most common (19.4%), followed by PCDF (7.4%) and PCD (6.8%). From 2003 to 2010, surgical management increased by an average of 40% each year. The overall inpatient mortality rate was 2.6%. Increasing age and comorbidities were associated with higher rates of patient mortality and a decreasing surgical rate (p<.01). Hospitals greater than 249 beds (p<.01) and the south (p<.01) were associated with a higher surgical rate. Rural hospitals (p<.01) and people in the second income quartile (p<.01) were associated with higher inpatient mortality., Conclusions: Elderly patients with medical comorbidities are associated with a lower surgical rate and a higher mortality rate. Surgical management was more prevalent in the south and large hospitals. Mortality was higher in rural hospitals. It is important for surgeons to understand how patient, surgical, and institutional factors influence surgical management and mortality., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: There are limited data analyzing radiological and clinical factors for the functional outcomes of surgery for spinal metastasis. Also, there are few studies to investigate the relationship between the functional outcome and the patients' survival. Thus, analysis of both functional outcomes and the survival with their relationship in a possibly homogenous group of patients is worth being reported., Purpose: To assess treatment outcomes of single-stage posterior decompression and stabilization (PDS) with or without corpectomy for thoracic vertebral metastases and to analyze factors affecting both the functional outcome and the patients' survival after the surgical intervention., Study Design: Retrospective observational study., Patient Sample: A consecutive series of 105 patients, who underwent the previously stated surgery for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) of thoracic spine, were included and retrospectively analyzed., Outcome Measures: The postoperative functional outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scale and Frankel grade at postoperative 2 weeks, and all patients were followed for survival analysis., Methods: An institutional database was searched to identify all patients who underwent single-stage PDS for thoracic metastatic spinal tumors between March 2002 and June 2010. Demographic data as well as preoperative and postoperative medical conditions were collected from medical records. Radiological findings were confirmed on electronic archive. Survival data were obtained either on medical records or with a reference to governmental cancer registry system., Results: Postoperative pain improvement was more evident in patients receiving anterior column reconstruction and four or more levels of fixation (p=.02 and <0.01, respectively). Twenty-one patients (20%) showed improvement of the Frankel grade, and 10 of 21 Frankel C patients became ambulatory. The preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (≥70) and ambulatory status were significant predictors for the postoperative ambulatory function. After surgery, the median overall survival of the patients was 6.0 months. In the univariate analysis, the patient's age (younger than 60 years), type of primary cancer (ie, moderate and slow growth), no visceral metastases, less than three levels of spinal metastases, and postoperative adjuvant therapy were positively significant for the patients' survival (p<.05). In the multivariate analysis, limited (less than three levels) spinal metastases and postoperative adjuvant therapy were proven to significantly prolong the patient's survival (hazard ratios of 0.53 and 0.48, respectively, p<.05). Although the functional outcomes did not directly influence the patients' survival, the patients with better functional outcome showed increased chance of receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy (p<.01)., Conclusions: Single-stage PDS with or without corpectomy effectively improved the functional status of patients with MSCC of the thoracic spine and also afforded the patients to have more chances of postoperative adjuvant therapy, which was significant for patients' survival. Therefore, we suggest that the role of surgery in the management of MSCC could be not only a symptomatic palliation but also a strategy to prolong patients' survival., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: Improving the surgical outcome of nonambulatory patients with metastatic epidural spinal compression has been of great interest lately. Although there have been many reports regarding the surgical outcome of spinal metastasis, the surgical outcome in terms of the probability of operative success for nonambulatory patients has not been thoroughly described. If the probability of ambulatory recovery is known, the optimal surgical indications can be determined and implemented., Purpose: To predict the surgical outcome and probability of ambulatory resumption for nonambulatory patients with spinal metastasis., Study Design: Retrospective analysis., Patient Sample: The surgical outcomes of patients who could not ambulate independently because of spinal metastasis from 1987 to 2010 were analyzed., Outcome Measures: The primary end point was postoperative ambulatory status. The secondary end point was survival time., Methods: Fifty-seven patients who could not ambulate independently at the time of surgery were included in the study. We defined "independent ambulation" as a better functional status than Nurick Grade 3, which is defined as "difficulty in walking which was not so severe as to require someone's help to walk." Preoperatively, functional status was Nurick Grade 4 in 21 patients and Grade 5 in 36 patients. Weakness developed 10.5 ± 11.9 days (median, 7.0; range, 1-80) before the operation and steadily worsened. Patients were unable to walk starting from 3.6 ± 4.9 days (median, 1.8; range, 0.5-23) before the operation. The spinal metastases were circumferentially decompressed., Results: Postoperatively, 39 patients (68%) could walk. Complications occurred in 26% (15/57) of the patients, and the major complication rate was 12% (7/57). The mortality rate was 5% (3/57). The patient survival time was 287 ± 51 days (median, 128) after the operation. Postoperative ambulatory status (yes vs. no, p < .01) and occurrence of major complication (yes vs. no, p < .01) affected survival time. Overall, patients could walk for 193±41 days (median, 114) postoperatively. Motor grade (grade ≥ 4/5 vs. <4/5, p < .01) and the occurrence of a major complication (yes vs. no, p < .01) were significant factors for resumption of ambulation. The rate of ambulation resumption was 95% (20/21) in patients with a motor grade of 4 of 5, whereas it was 53% (19/36) in patients with a motor grade less than 4 of 5 (p < .01)., Conclusions: The survival time of nonambulatory patients was dependent on ambulation recovery. About 95% of the nonambulatory patients could walk after surgery, when the operation was done in a timely manner with good remaining motor function. However, given the short life expectancy and the considerable surgical complication rate, surgery should only be prudently recommended to patients with optimal indications., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)