Search

Background Context: Vertebral compression fractures secondary to low bone mass are responsible for almost 130,000 inpatient admissions and 133,500 emergency department visits annually, totaling over $5 billion of direct inpatient costs. Although most vertebral compression fractures heal within a few months with conservative therapy, a significant portion fail to improve with conservative treatment and require long-term care, conservative treatment, or both. Fractures that fail conservative therapy are treated with vertebral augmentation procedures (VAPs) such as vertebroplasty (VP) and kyphoplasty (KP). Two large randomized clinical trials published in 2009 questioned the efficacy of VP in treatment of VAPs., Purpose: This study aimed to investigate trends in utilization of VP and KP between 2005 and 2010 to capture the impact of the 2009 literature on utilization of VAPs. The study also compares patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes between VP and KP to further delineate the risks of each procedure., Study Design: Retrospective analysis of national utilization rates, clinical outcomes, patient demographics, and patient comorbidities using a large national inpatient database., Patient Sample: A total of 63,459 inpatient admissions from 46 states and more than 1,000 different hospitals were included in the analysis., Outcome Measures: Length of stay (LOS), total direct cost, mortality, postoperative complications., Methods: Data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample database for the period between 2005 and 2010. National Inpatient Sample is the largest publicly available all payer inpatient database in the United States. Patients undergoing VP and KP were identified via corresponding the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision procedure codes. National utilization trends were estimated using weights supplied as part of the National Inpatient Sample dataset. Information on patient comorbidities and demographics was collected. A series of univariate and multivarariate analyses were used to identify statistically significant differences in patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, as well as cost and LOS between patients undergoing VP versus KP., Results: A total of 307,050 inpatient VAPs were performed in the United States between 2005 and 2010. Of those procedures, 225,259 were KP and 81,790 were VP. Kyphoplasty utilization showed an increasing trend between 2005 and 2007, increasing from 27 to 33 procedures per 100,000 capita older than 40 years. During the same time period, VP utilization remained constant at approximately nine procedures per 100,000 capita older than 40 years. After 2007, utilization of both VP and KP decreased. The most precipitous decrease in VAP utilization occurred in 2009. Patients undergoing VP were on average older (76.7 vs. 77.8, p<.0001), more frequently women (74.48% vs. 73.15%, p=.00083), and black (1.77% vs. 1.55%, p=.004059). Patients undergoing VP had on average more comorbidities then those undergoing KP. Patients undergoing VP had a higher rate of postoperative anemia secondary to acute bleeding and higher rate of venous thromboembolic events. Those undergoing KP had a greater rate of cardiac complications; however, this difference was not statistically significant when taking into account patient age and comorbidity burden. Vertebroplasty was associated with higher mortality (0.93% vs. 0.60%, p<.001), longer LOS (6.78 vs. 5.05 days, p<.0001), and lower total cost ($42,154 vs. $46,101, p<.0001)., Conclusions: Overall, KP was associated with lower complication rates, shorter LOS, and a higher total direct cost compared with VP. Utilization rates showed a significant decrease since 2009 in both VP and KP, suggesting that both procedures were impacted by the two randomized controlled trials published in 2009 that suggested poor efficacy of VP., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) techniques have been used for years to treat a number of pathologies of the lower back. These procedures may use an anterior, posterior, or combined surgical approach. Each approach is associated with a unique set of complications, but the exact prevalence of complications associated with each approach remains unclear., Purpose: To investigate the rates of perioperative complications of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (P/TLIF), and LIF with a combined anterior-posterior interbody fusion (APF)., Study Design/setting: Retrospective review of national data from a large administrative database., Patient Sample: Patients undergoing ALIF, P/TLIF, or APF., Outcome Measures: Perioperative complications, length of stay (LOS), total costs, and mortality., Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients undergoing ALIF, P/TLIF, or APF between 2001 and 2010 as identified via International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision codes. Univariate analyses were carried out comparing the three cohorts in terms of the outcomes of interest. Multivariate analysis for primary outcomes was carried out adjusting for overall comorbidity burden, race, gender, age, and length of fusion. National estimates of annual total number of procedures were calculated based on the provided discharge weights. Geographic distribution of the three cohorts was also investigated., Results: An estimated total of 923,038 LIFs were performed between 2001 and 2010 in the United States. Posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions accounted for 79% to 86% of total LIFs between 2001 and 2010, ALIFs for 10% to 15%, and APF decreased from 10% in 2002 to less than 1% in 2010. On average, P/TLIF patients were oldest (54.55 years), followed by combined approach (47.23 years) and ALIF (46.94 years) patients (p<.0001). Anterior lumbar interbody fusion, P/TLIF, and combined surgical costs were $75,872, $65,894, and $92,249, respectively (p<.0001). Patients in the P/TLIF cohort had the greatest number of comorbidities, having the highest prevalence for 10 of 17 comorbidities investigated. Anterior-posterior interbody fusion group was associated with the greatest number of complications, having the highest incidence of 12 of the 16 complications investigated., Conclusions: These data help to define the perioperative risks for several LIF approaches. Comparison of outcomes showed that a combined approach is more expensive and associated with greater LOS, whereas ALIF is associated with the highest postoperative mortality. These trends should be taken into consideration during surgical planning to improve clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)