1. A time‐varying effect model for examining group differences in trajectories of zero‐inflated count outcomes with applications in substance abuse research
- Author
-
Robert A. Zucker, Anne Buu, Runze Li, Songshan Yang, James A. Cranford, and Jennifer M. Jester
- Subjects
Male ,Statistics and Probability ,Michigan ,Time Factors ,Adolescent ,Alcohol Drinking ,Substance-Related Disorders ,Epidemiology ,Alternative hypothesis ,Statistics as Topic ,030508 substance abuse ,Poisson distribution ,Article ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,symbols.namesake ,Sex Factors ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,Statistics ,Econometrics ,Humans ,Longitudinal Studies ,Poisson Distribution ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Poisson regression ,Probability ,Mathematics ,Statistical hypothesis testing ,Models, Statistical ,Alcoholism ,Sample size determination ,Sample Size ,symbols ,Female ,Component (group theory) ,0305 other medical science ,Null hypothesis ,Type I and type II errors - Abstract
This study proposes a time-varying effect model for examining group differences in trajectories of zero-inflated count outcomes. The motivating example demonstrates that this zero-inflated Poisson model allows investigators to study group differences in different aspects of substance use (e.g., the probability of abstinence and the quantity of alcohol use) simultaneously. The simulation study shows that the accuracy of estimation of trajectory functions improves as the sample size increases; the accuracy under equal group sizes is only higher when the sample size is small (100). In terms of the performance of the hypothesis testing, the type I error rates are close to their corresponding significance levels under all settings. Furthermore, the power increases as the alternative hypothesis deviates more from the null hypothesis, and the rate of this increasing trend is higher when the sample size is larger. Moreover, the hypothesis test for the group difference in the zero component tends to be less powerful than the test for the group difference in the Poisson component. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF