Search

It has previously been shown that the phage-derived phiC31 integrase can efficiently target native pseudo-attachment sites in the genome of various species in cultured cells, as well as in vivo. To demonstrate its utility in human embryonic stem cells (hESC), we have created hESC-derived clones containing expression constructs. Variant human embryonic stem cell lines BG01v and SA002 were used to derive lines expressing a green fluorescent protein (GFP) marker under control of either the human Oct4 promoter or the EF1α promoter. Stable clones were selected by antibiotic resistance and further characterized. The frequency of integration suggested candidate hot spots in the genome, which were mapped using a plasmid rescue strategy. The pseudo-attP profile in hESC differed from those reported earlier in differentiated cells. Clones derived using this method retained the ability to differentiate into all three germ layers, and fidelity of expression of GFP was verified in differentiation assays. GFP expression driven by the Oct4 promoter recapitulated endogenous Oct4 expression, whereas persistent stable expression of GFP expression driven by the EF1α promoter was seen. Our results demonstrate the utility of phiC31 integrase to target pseudo-attP sites in hESC and show that integrase-mediated site-specific integration can efficiently create stably expressing engineered human embryonic stem cell clones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multipotent neural stem cells (NSC) have been derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESC) as well as isolated from fetal tissues. However, there have been few exclusive markers of NSC identified to date, and the differences between NSC from various sources are poorly understood. Although cells isolated from these two sources share many important characteristics, it is not clear how closely they are related in terms of gene expression. Here, we compare the gene expression profiles of 11 lines of NSC derived from hESC (ES_NSC), four lines of NSC isolated from fetus (F_NSC), and two lines of restricted progenitors in order to characterize these cell populations and identify differences between NSC derived from these two sources. We showed that ES_NSC were clustered together with high transcriptional similarities but were distinguished from F_NSC, oligodendrocyte precursor cells, and astrocyte precursor cells. There were 17 genes expressed in both ES_NSC and F_NSC whose expression was not identified in restricted neural progenitors. Furthermore, the major differences between ES_NSC and F_NSC were mostly observed in genes related to the key neural differentiation pathways. Here, we show that comparison of global gene expression profiles of ES_NSC, F_NSC, and restricted neural progenitor cells makes it possible to identify some of the common characteristics of NSC and differences between similar stem cell populations derived from hESCs or isolated from fetal tissue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the number of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines increases, so does the need for systematic evaluation of each line's characteristics and potential. Comparisons between lines are complicated by variations in culture conditions, feeders, spontaneous differentiation, and the absence of standardized assays. These difficulties, combined with the inability of most labs to maintain more than a few lines simultaneously, compel the development of reference standards to which hESC lines can be compared. The use of a stable cell line as a reference standard offers many advantages. A line with a relatively unchanging hESC-like gene and protein expression pattern could be a positive control for developing assays. It can be used as a reference for genomics or proteomics studies, especially for normalizing results obtained in separate laboratories. Such a cell line should be widely available without intellectual property restraints, easily cultured without feeders, and resistant to spontaneous changes in phenotype. We propose that the embryonal carcinoma (EC) line 2102Ep meets these requirements. We compared the protein, gene, and microRNA expression of this cell line with those of hESC lines and alternative reference lines such as the EC line NTERA-2 and the karyotypically abnormal hESC line BG01V. The overall expression profiles of all these lines were similar, with exceptions reflecting the germ cell origins of EC. On the basis of global gene and microRNA expression, 2102Ep is somewhat less similar to hESC than the alternatives; however, 2102Ep expresses more hESC-associated microRNAs than NTERA-2 does, and fewer markers of differentiated fates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]