Search

Few studies have determined the viability of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We examined the results of RCC patients who had five or fewer lesions and were treated with TKI and SBRT.The clinical data of 42 patients with 96 metastases treated between 2011 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. The prognostic factors predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed in uni- and multivariable analyses.Median follow-up and time between TKI therapy and SBRT were 62.3 and 3.7 months, respectively. The 2‑year OS and PFS rates were 58.0% and 51.3%, respectively, and 2‑year local control rate was 94.1% per SBRT-treated lesion. In univariable analysis, the time between TKI therapy and SBRT and treatment response were significant prognostic factors for OS and PFS. In multivariable analysis, a time between TKI therapy and SBRT of less than 3 months and complete response were significant predictors of better OS and PFS. Only 12 patients (28.6%) had a systemic treatment change at a median of 18.2 months after SBRT, mostly in patients with a non-complete treatment response after this therapy. Two patients (4.8%) experienced grade III toxicity, and all side effects observed during metastasis-directed therapy subsided over time.We demonstrated that SBRT in combination with TKIs is an effective and safe treatment option for RCC patients with ≤ 5 metastases. However, distant metastasis was observed in 60% of the patients, indicating that distant disease control still has room for improvement.

This study aimed to analyze the prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with bone-only metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have five or fewer lesions treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).The clinical data of 54 patients with 70 bone metastases undergoing SBRT treated between 2013 and 2020 with a dose of at least 5 Gy per fraction and a biologically effective dose (BED) of at least 90 Gy were retrospectively evaluated.The majority of lesions were located in the spine (57.4%) and had only one metastasis (64.8%). After a median follow-up of 22.4 months, the 1‑ and 2‑year OS rates were 84.6% and 67.3%, respectively, and median OS was 43.1 months. The 1‑ and 2‑year PFS rates and median PFS were 63.0%, 38.9%, and 15.3 months, respectively. In SBRT-treated lesions, the 1‑year local control (LC) rate was 94.9%. Age, metastasis localization, and number of fractions of SBRT were significant prognostic factors for OS in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, patients with spinal metastasis had better OS compared to their counterparts, and patients who received single-fraction SBRT had better PFS than those who did not. No patient experienced acute or late toxicities of grade 3 or greater.Despite excellent LC at the oligometastatic site treated with SBRT, disease progression was observed in nearly half of patients 13 months after metastasis-directed local therapy, particularly as distant disease progression other than the treated lesion, necessitating an effective systemic treatment to improve treatment outcomes.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes ofIn this multi-institutional study, clinical data of 176 PC patients with 353 lesions receiving MDT between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. All patients had biopsy proven PC with ≤5 metastases detected withAt the time of MDT, 59 patients (33.5%) had synchronous and 117 patients (66.5%) had metachronous metastases. Median number of metastases was one and the MDT technique was SBRT in 73.3% patients. The 2‑year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 87.6% and 63.1%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 22.9 months, 9 patients had local recurrence at the irradiated site. The 2‑year local control rate at the treated oligometastatic site per patient was 93.2%. In multivariate analysis, an increased number of oligometastases and untreated primary PC were negative predictors for OS; advanced clinical tumor stage, untreated primary PC, BED3 value of ≤108 Gy, and MDT with conventional fractionation were negative predictors for PFS. No patient experienced grade ≥3 acute toxicity, but one patient had a late grade 3 toxicity of compression fracture after spinal SBRT.

To validate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with Gleason score (GS) 8–10 disease treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the modern era. Institutional databases of biopsy proven 641 patients with GS 8–10 PCa treated between 2000 and 2015 were collected from 11 institutions. In this multi-institutional Turkish Radiation Oncology Group study, a standard database sheet was sent to each institution for patient enrollment. The inclusion criteria were, T1–T3N0M0 disease according to AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) 2010 Staging System, no prior diagnosis of malignancy, at least 70 Gy total irradiation dose to prostate ± seminal vesicles delivered with either three-dimensional conformal RT or intensity-modulated RT and patients receiving ADT. The median follow-up time was 5.9 years (range 0.4–18.2 years); 5‑year overall survival (OS), biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) rates were 88%, 78%, and 79%, respectively. Higher RT doses (≥78 Gy) and longer ADT duration (≥2 years) were significant predictors for improved DMFS, whereas advanced stage was a negative prognosticator for DMFS in patients with GS 9–10. Our results validated the fact that oncologic outcomes after radical EBRT significantly differ in men with GS 8 versus those with GS 9–10 prostate cancer. We found that EBRT dose was important predictive factor regardless of ADT period. Patients receiving ‘non-optimal treatment’ (RT doses