Search

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:While mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the standard of care for acute stroke patients presenting with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and salvageable brain tissue, limited data is currently available regarding the benefits of MT in patents with medium vessel occlusions (MeVO) especially in the posterior circulation (P2 occlusions).Methods:We used the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm registry (STAR) which included data from 35 stroke centers in North America, Europe, Asia, and South America. We included patients who presented with MeVO in the M2, M3 or P2 segments and underwent MT. We used a Generalized Linear Model to assess the relationship between location of occlusion and outcomes.Results:9812 patients were included in STAR at the time of this analysis; 43 underwent MT for P2 occlusion, 130 underwent MT for M3 occlusion; and 1273 underwent MT for M2 occlusion. There was no difference in age, sex, race, rate of IV-tPA and stroke severity between patients in all 3 groups (Table 1). There was a trend toward lower rate of atrial fibrillation in patients with P2 and M3 occlusions. Patients with P2 occlusions were less likely to achieve successful recanalization (modified treatment in cerebral infarction score≥2b); intraarterial thrombolysis was used less in P2 occlusions (4.7% compared to 16.2% in M3 occlusions and 10.1% in M2 occlusions). However, there was no difference in the rate of successful first pass. On multivariable analysis, P2 occlusions were not associated with hemorrhagic transformation (OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.7-5.7, P 0.186), 90-day mortality (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-1.4, P 0.183), or 90-day favorable outcome (OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.9-4.4, P 0.084).Conclusions:In this multicenter study, there was no significant difference in safety and efficacy of MT in patients with MeVOs in posterior circulation (P2 occlusions) compared to M2 and M3 occlusions. Improved techniques for successful recanalization are needed for posterior circulation MeVOs.

Introductions:Clinical trials have shown that aspiration thrombectomy is as safe and effective as stent-retriever thrombectomy. Multiple improvements have been made to the aspiration technique over the last few years. In this study, we aim to assess the effect of aspiration catheter bore size on the outcomes of A direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) thrombectomy.Methods:We included patients who underwent ADAPT thrombectomy for M1 or internal carotid artery terminus (ICA-T) occlusions in the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm (STAR) database. Patients included between July 2016 and July 2022. We compared baseline characteristics, procedural metrics and outcomes between patients who underwent thrombectomy using small bore (0.035”-0.060”), medium bore (0.062”-0.068”) and large bore (0.070”-0.074”) catheters.Results:A total of 1158 patients were included; 576 (49.7%) females, 645 (70%) White, and 464 (40.6%) received IV-tPA. No difference was noticed in age, sex, and vascular risk factors between the 3 different groups. There was higher rate of IV-tPA in the small-bore catheter group (48.8%) compared to the medium and large bore catheter groups (38.4% and 36.7%, respectively) (P=0.03). Procedure duration was shorter when using medium (20 min) and large (18 min) compared to small bore catheters (30 min) (P=0.01). Both medium and large bore catheters were associated with higher rate of successful recanalization (88.9% and 87.9%, respectively) compared to small bore catheters (81.6%) (P=0.010). However, the difference in successful recanalization or procedure duration between medium and large bore catheters was not significant. No difference was noted in the rate of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (sICH) (4.7%, 5.3%, and 7.1%; P=0.345), 90-day favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) (41.8%, 39.3%, 40.8%; P=0.766) or 90-day mortality (18.1%, 23.5%, 24.4%; P=0.111) between the groups.Conclusions:Higher rate of successful recanalization and shorter procedure duration were observed when using medium and large bore aspiration catheters compared with small bore catheters in ADAPT technique. However, these procedural benefits were not observed when comparing large bore to medium bore catheters.

Background:Mechanical thrombectomy is standard of care for acute ischemic stroke secondary to LVO however MT failure (MTF) occurs in approximately 15% of cases.Objective:Investigate patient and procedural characteristics that predict MTF.Methods:Retrospective review of prospectively collected, Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry. Patients who underwent MT for LVO were included and categorized by MT Success (MTS) or MTF, defined as mTICI≥2b or

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

*on behalf of the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) CollaboratorsIntroduction:Intravenous thrombolysis complications are enriched in AF associated stroke, as these patients have worse functional outcomes, less effective recanalization, and increased rates of hemorrhagic complications. These data suggest that AF patients may be at particularly high risk for complications of bridging therapy for large vessel occlusions treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Here we determine whether clinical outcomes differ in AF associated stroke treated with MT and bridging therapy.Methods:We performed a retrospective cohort study of the Stroke and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) from January 2015 to December 2018 and identified 4,169 patients who underwent MT for an anterior circulation stroke, 1,517 (36.4 %) of which had comorbid AF. Prospectively defined baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared.Results:Hemorrhagic complications after MT were similar in patients with or without AF. In patients without AF, bridging therapy improved 90-day outcomes (aOR 1.32, 1.02-1.74, p<0.05) without increasing hemorrhagic complications. In patients with AF, bridging therapy independently predicted hemorrhagic complications in AF patients (aOR 2.08, 1.06-4.06, p<0.033) without improving functional outcomes.Conclusions:Bridging therapy in AF patients undergoing thrombectomy independently increased the odds of intracranial hemorrhage and did not improve functional outcomes. AF patients may represent a high-risk subgroup for thrombolytic complications. Randomized trials are warranted to determine whether patients with AF associated stroke may benefit by deferring bridging therapy at thrombectomy-capable centers.

Introduction:The benefit of thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion (LVO) is well proven. There is minimal data on concurrent thrombectomy for multi-territory occlusions.Methods:We reviewed the STAR registry from 2015-8 for patients treated with either right and left sided thrombectomy or anterior and posterior circulation thrombectomy at 15 comprehensive stroke centers.Results:There were 4966 patients in the study period who had completed outcome data and LVO thrombectomy. 38 (0.8%) underwent endovascular thrombectomy for multi-territory occlusions. 26% had bilateral occlusions and 74% had anterior and posterior circulation occlusions. Among the 38, 50% were female, 49% were white, and 91% had a prestroke mRS<3. 95% had an ASPECT score of >6 and 55% received iv t-pa. 83% of patients had successful recanalization (TICI 2B/3) for both territories. The overall complication rate was 15%. 5% of patients had sICH or PH2. 26% of patients had a 90day mRS<2. When controlling for admission NIHSS, baseline mRS, age, comorbidities, and ASPECT in logistic regression analysis, multiple territory compared to single territory did not predict increased risk of sICH (p=0.73, 95%CI: 0.2-3.3), rate of TICI2B/3 (OR for TICI2B+: 0.93, p=0.88, CI: 0.38 - 2.3), or worse outcome (OR for good outcome: 0.6, p=.212, CI: 0.3-1.3). On linear regression analysis for attempts and procedure time, multiple territory thrombectomy required significantly higher number of attempts (Coefficient +1.8, p=0.001) without a significantly longer procedure time (Coefficient = +10, p=0.244).Conclusion:With similar selection to single territory LVOs, good outcome can be achieved in multi-territory infarction with reasonable procedure time and no additional risk of hemorrhage or poor outcome.

Introduction:Successful first pass (SFP) has been identified as a key benchmark of the success of mechanical thrombectomy (MT). However, studies that evaluate the predictors and outcomes of SFP using ADAPT (A Direct Aspiration first Pass Technique) are limied by the small number of patients or single center design.Methods:We used data from the prospectively collected data from 28 stroke centers that are included in the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR). Patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions at the level of M1 or M2 segments were included. SFP was defined by achieving modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score≥2b with a single aspiration attempt. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the predictors of SFP and evaluate the relationship between SFP and favorable 90-day outcome (90-day modified Rankin scale ≤2).Results:Out of 6123 patients included in STAR, 1002 (16.4%) underwent MT of M1 or M2 occlusion using ADAPT technique. SFP was achieved in 390 (38.9%) patients. SFP patients were older (72 vs. 69, P=0.007), had higher Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) on presentation (9 vs. 8, P=0.018) (Table 1). On multivariable analysis, neither age (aOR 1.006, 95% CI 0.996-1.016, P=0.252) nor ASPECTS (aOR 1.055, 95% CI 0.976-1.141, P=0.179) were independent predictor of SFP. Importantly, SFP was independently associated with favorable 90-day outcome (aOR 2.769, 95% CI 1.988-3.858, P<0.001) after controlling for age, sex, ASPECTS, history of atrial fibrillation, NIHSS on presentation, onset to groin time and IV-tPA.Conclusion:In this cohort of patients with M1 or M2 occlsuion undergoing MT using ADAPT technique, patients who had SFP were older and had better ASPECTS. However, both age and ASPECTS were not independently associated with SFP. Also, patients who had SFP were almost 3 times more likely to achieve favorable 90-day outcome.

Introduction:Patients with poor baseline images were excluded from most clinical trials so the data about whether these patients could benefit from MT remains unknown. In this study, we aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of MT in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and large core infarct (LCI).Methods:The Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) was interrogated. We included thrombectomy patients presenting with LVO within 24 hours and with a LCI as defined by Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) < 6. Patients presenting within 6 hours of last known normal (LKN) were considered in the early window and patients presenting after 6 hours were considered in the late window. 90-day outcomes were assessed. We used a logistic regression model to assess the factors associated with good 90-day outcome in patients in the early and late windows.Results:144 patients were included in this study (table). Median age was 69 and 92 (64%) patients were treated in the early MT window. ICA was the most common site of occlusion (48.6%) and ADAPT was used in 34.7%. Admission NIHSS was 17.5. Successful recanalization (TICI>2b) was achieved in 84.7% and median procedure time was 54 minutes. sICH hemorrhage was observed in 22 (15.3%). Median mRS was 4 at 90 days. Favorable outcome was observed in 41 patients (28.5%) and mortality occurred in in 59 (41%). There was no difference in 90-day functional outcome between patients in early and late windows. In patients presenting in the early window, age (aOR=0.905, p=0.0002) and baseline NIHSS (aOR=0.909, p=0.0423) were independently associated with 90-day outcome. In patients presenting in the late window, only age (aOR=0.934, p=0.0069) was independently associated with good outcome.Conclusion:More than one in four patients presenting with ASPECTS<6 may achieve functional independence at 90-day following MT. Patient age remains the main predictor of 90-day outcome in patients with low ASPECTS in both late and early windows.

Introduction:Recent trials have proven safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy for patients presenting with emergent large vessel occlusion beyond 6 hours of symptom onset. While evidence supports using baseline CT scan to evaluate the candidacy for mechanical thrombectomy for patients presenting in the early window, late window trials have used advanced imaging such as CT and MR perfusion. We aim to assess outcomes of MT stratified by admission Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS).Methods:We used data from the prospectively maintained registries of 28 stroke centers in the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm (STAR) collaboration. Demographics, comorbidities, LVO site, ASPECTS, MT technique, radiographic and clinical outcome data were collected. Patients with M1 or ICA occlusion were included in these analyses. Multivariable analysis was performed using a generalized linear model with logit link to assess for variables associated with favorable outcomes.Results:3356 patients in the STAR database were reviewed and 347 (10.3%) of those underwent MT in the late window (table). Median age was 69, 189 (54.5%) were female, and 181 (52.2%) were white. 295 patients ASPECTS ≥6. In this group, 200 (68.8%) had M1 occlusion, and the remaining had ICA occlusion. Aspiration thrombectomy was used in 139 (47.1%) of patients. Successful reperfusion was achieved (mTICI≥2b) in 264 (76.1%). sICH was observed in 15 (5.1%). Excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-2) was observed in 124 (42%) patients. ASPECTS score was independently associated with favorable outcomes (aOR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4, P=0.006).Conclusion:Excellent outcomes are observed in patients with good ASPECT score presenting in the late window irrespective of perfusion criteria. Admission CT scan could be used to triage patients presenting with emergent large vessel occlusion beyond 6 hours of symptom onset.

Introduction:Previous studies have reported that Hispanic stroke patients have limited access to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) compared to other ethnic groups. This has resulted in worse stroke outcomes in this group. However, limited data is available about the outcomes of MT in Hispanic patients.Methods:We used data from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) that combined the prospectively maintained databases of 28 thrombectomy-capable stroke centers in the US, Europe, and Asia. Consecutive patients who underwent MT were included in these analyses and patients were divided into 2 groups (Hispanics vs. non-Hispanics). Baseline features, time from symptom onset, thrombolysis receipt, final thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score, symptomatic hemorrhage, and 90-day functional outcomes (measured by modified Rankin scale-mRS) were compared between Hispanic and non-Hispanics patients. A generalized linear model with logit link was used to assess the relationship between ethnicity and favorable outcomes at 90-day (mRS 0-2) controlling for confounders.Results:We included 2015 patients in these analyses. Of those, 285 (14.1%) were Hispanic. As shown in table 1, Hispanic patients were older (72 vs. 70, p=0.007), more likely to have diabetes (41.1% vs. 26.5%, p<0.001), and more likely to have hypertension (81.8% vs. 73.7%, p=0.004). Importantly, Hispanics had a shorter procedure duration with a similar rate of successful recanalization (TICI≥2B). On multivariable analysis, Hispanic ethnicity was associated with a lower probability of favorable 90-day outcome (aOR 0.659, 95% CI 0.494-0.879, P=0.005) after controlling for age, stroke risk factors and location of occlusion.Conclusion:Hispanic patients receiving MT have higher rate of stroke risk factors including diabetes and hypertension. Moreover, Hispanic ethnicity was independently associated with lower probability of favorable 90-day outcome.