Search

Copyright of Studia Kantiana is the property of Sociedade Kant Brasileira and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Studia Kantiana is the property of Sociedade Kant Brasileira and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper aims to analyze some relations of similarities and differ- ences between the idealism of Berkeley (1710) and Kant (1781/ 1787), whose general problem can be formulated as follows: in what sense the idealist philos- ophy of Berkeley and Kant's approach and distant from each other? Such a re- sponse will be focused on four aspects, divided as follows. Regarding approach- es, will examine whether, on the one hand, the conception of the subject in both philosophers and on the other, their respective defenses of realism. As for dis- tances, will address whether, in part, the criticisms of those philosophers to idealism, and another, their proper conceptions of space and time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]