Search

Introduction: Cardiovascular complications are the leading cause of death after noncardiac surgery. Major abdominal operations represent the largest category of procedures considered to have an increased risk of cardiovascular complications. The current aim was to examine trends in the incidence of mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, and cardiac arrest to determine the presence of potential volume-outcome relationships., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for patients undergoing elective, open abdominal esophagectomy, gastrectomy, pancreatectomy, nephrectomy, hepatectomy, splenectomy, and colectomy (major abdominal surgery) during 2008-2014. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the impact of operative volume on rates of myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, and mortality., Results: Of the 962,754 elective admissions for major abdominal surgery, 1.4% experienced in-hospital mortality, 0.7% myocardial infarction, and 0.35% cardiac arrest. Myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest were associated with a 24-fold increase in risk of perioperative mortality. Compared with institutions that have a very low volume of operations, those hospitals with larger volumes of operations had a decreased risk of cardiac arrest and incident mortality after cardiovascular complications, but the odds of myocardial infarction were greatest at higher operative-volume hospitals. The annual all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction rates decreased over time, but the incidence of cardiac arrest increased., Conclusion: Myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest after major abdominal surgery increased the odds of mortality with superior rescue after cardiovascular complications at higher volume institutions. Across all US hospitals performing major abdominal surgery, the rate of cardiac arrest increased without a concomitant increase in myocardial infarction or mortality. Novel targets for risk modification of myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest as well as investigation of processes that facilitate rescue after these complications at higher operative-volume hospitals are needed to delineate quality improvement opportunities., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To quantify the burden of digestive diseases avertable by surgical care at first-level hospitals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)., Methods: We examined 4 digestive diseases from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2010 STUDY: Appendicitis, intestinal obstruction, inguinal and femoral hernia, and gallbladder and bile duct disease. Using demographic and epidemiologic data from the GBD 2010 STUDY, we calculated the potential decrease in burden of digestive diseases if quality surgical services were available universally and accessible at first-level hospitals. The lowest case fatality rates for each age and sex grouping from all GBD regions were assumed to reflect the best possible state of full surgical coverage and treatment. These best scenario rates were applied to the GBD 2010 results from all LMIC regions to estimate surgically avertable burden., Results: Overall, 4.8 million disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) or 65% of burden related to the 4 digestive diseases are avertable potentially with first-level surgical care in LMICs. Sub-Saharan Africa has the greatest avertable burden in absolute DALYs (1.7 million) and avertable proportion (83%). Intestinal obstruction accounted for the largest portion of avertable burden among the 4 digestive diseases (2.2 million DALYs; 64% avertable)., Conclusion: Improving the capacity of surgical services at first-level hospitals is essential for averting the burden of digestive diseases in LMICs. Practicable strategies for scaling up surgical capacities in rural districts are available potentially, which must be given due attention., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Studies of risk factors after pancreatoduodenectomy are few: some concern restricted populations and others are based on administrative data., Methods: Multicenter clinical data were collected for 300 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy to determine (by univariate and multivariate analysis) preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications (IACs), including pancreatic fistula. Fourteen factors including the center and volume effect were analyzed., Results: In univariate analysis, mortality was increased with age 70 years or more, extended resection(s), and volume and center effects. IACs occurred more often with main pancreatic duct diameter of 3 mm or less, normal parenchyma texture, extended resection(s), and the center effect. Pancreatic fistula was more frequent with main pancreatic duct diameter of 3 mm or less, normal parenchyma texture, and the center effect. In multivariate analysis, independent risk factor(s) for mortality were age greater than 70 years (odds ratio [OR], 3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-8) and extended resection (OR, 5; 95% CI, 1.2-22), risk factors for IACs were extended resection (OR, 5; 95% CI, 1.2-22) and main pancreatic duct diameter of 3 mm or less (OR, 2; 95% CI, 1.1-3), and the risk factor for pancreatic fistula was main pancreatic duct diameter of 3 mm or less (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-4.6)., Conclusions: Age more than 70 years, extended resections, and main pancreatic duct diameter less than 3 mm are independent risk factors that should be considered in indications for and techniques of pancreatoduodenectomy.

Background: Alternative methods for abdominal wall closure may be necessary after emergency laparotomy. The purpose of this study was to determine the morbidity and outcome of emergency fascial closure with polypropylene mesh., Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing emergency fascial closure with polypropylene mesh from January 1990 to March 1994., Results: Seventy patients were identified. Indications for mesh placement included visceral edema (40), infected/necrotic fascia (21), and planned reexploration (7). Enteric fistulas developed in five patients (7.1%). When omentum was interposed between intestine and mesh, the incidence of fistula was significantly reduced (0 of 51 vs 5 of 19, p < 0.01). Forty-two patients (60%) survived with wound closure, accomplished by skin flaps in 19 (45%), skin grafting in 11 (26%), and secondary healing in 6 (14%). The mesh was removed in six patients (14%). Complications of mesh extrusion and hernia occurred less often after skin flap closure compared with skin grafting or secondary healing (1 of 19 vs 9 of 17, p < 0.01). No mesh infection occurred., Conclusions: Polypropylene mesh placement is an effective alternative for abdominal closure after emergency laparotomy, even when intraabdominal sepsis is present. Fistulas associated with its use may be effectively eliminated by the interposition of omentum between bowel and mesh. Wound closure with full-thickness skin flaps is the preferred method for soft tissue coverage when mesh is used.