Search

Background and Aims: The 30-day readmission rate is a nationally recognized quality measure with nearly one-fifth of patients being readmitted. This study aims to evaluate frailty, as measured by the hospital frailty risk score (HFRS), as a prognostic indicator for 30-day readmission after inpatient ERCP., Methods: We analyzed weighted discharge records from the 2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) to identify patients undergoing ERCP between 01/01/2017 and 11/30/2017. Our primary outcome was the 30-day unplanned readmission rate in frail (defined as HFRS > 5) against non-frail (HFRS < 5) patients. A mixed effects multivariable logistic regression method was employed., Results: Among 68,206 weighted hospitalized patients undergoing ERCP, 31.3% were frail. Frailty was associated with higher 30-day readmission (OR 1.23, 95% CI [1.16-1.30]). Multivariable analysis showed a greater risk of readmission with cirrhosis (OR 1.26, 95% CI [1.10-1.45]), liver transplantation (OR 1.36, 95% CI [1.08-1.71]), cancer (OR 1.58, 95% CI [1.48-1.69]), and male gender (OR 1.24, 95% CI [1.18-1.31]). Frail patients also had higher mortality rate (1.8% vs 0.6%, p < 0.01)], longer LOS during readmission (6.7 vs 5.6 days, p < 0.01), and incurred more charges from both hospitalizations ($175,620 vs $132,519, p < 0.01). Sepsis was the most common primary indication for both frail and non-frail readmissions but accounted for a greater percentage of frail readmissions (17.9% vs 12.4%, p < 0.01)., Conclusions: Frailty is associated with higher readmission rates, mortality, LOS, and hospital charges for admitted patients undergoing ERCP. Sepsis is the leading cause for readmission. Independent risk factors for readmission include liver transplantation, cancer, cirrhosis, and male gender., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background and Aims: The quality of colonoscopy is essential for successful colon cancer screening. Inadequate polypectomy technique can contribute to incomplete polypectomy. The primary outcome of this study was to compare the incomplete resection rate (IRR) for cold jumbo forceps polypectomy (JFP) and cold snare polypectomy (CSP). Secondary outcomes were to compare the rates of tissue retrieval and rates of procedure-related complications., Methods: This prospective randomized parallel-group study assigned patients undergoing colonoscopy to jumbo biopsy forceps polypectomy (JFP) or cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for polyps ≤ 6 mm in size. After polyp removal was complete, the base of the polypectomy site was biopsied to evaluate for the presence of residual polyp tissue., Results: The resection quality was evaluated in 151 patients with 261 polyps ≤ 6 mm. The IRR was 9.6% (25/261) for all polyps, 11.1% (16/144) for JFP, and 7.7% (9/117) for CSP (P = 0.41). Failure of tissue retrieval was noted in 0/144 (0%) of JFP and 5/117 (4.3%) of CSP (P = 0.02). There were no procedure-related complications in either group., Conclusion: Colon polyps are incompletely resected in a small but potentially significant percentage of cases. IRR are similar with the use of cold jumbo forceps and cold snare. Use of cold jumbo forceps may result in more successful tissue retrieval as compared to cold snare.

Background: Quality indicators are increasingly emphasized in the performance of colonoscopy. This study aimed to determine the standard of care rendered by surgeon-endoscopists in a Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center by evaluating the indications for colonoscopy and outcome performance measures according to established quality indicators for colonoscopy., Methods: A prospective standardized computer endoscopic reporting database (ProVation MD) was retrospectively reviewed. All colonoscopies performed by attending surgeons at the San Diego VA medical center between 1 January 2004 and 31 July 2007 were included in the study. Patients with charts that had incomplete reporting were excluded. The quality indicators used included the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) criteria for colorectal cancer screening, the American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines for postcancer resection surveillance, and the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopists (ASGE) quality indicators for colonoscopy., Results: The data for 558 patients (96% men) were analyzed. The average patient age was 63 years (range, 25-93 years). Almost all the colonoscopies (99%) were performed in accordance with established criteria. The most common indications for colonoscopy were screening (n = 143, 26%), non-acute gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 127, 23%), polyp surveillance (n = 100, 18%), postcancer resection surveillance (n = 91, 17%), abdominal pain (n = 19, 4%), and anemia (n = 14, 3%). Postcancer resection surveillance colonoscopies were performed according to recommended criteria in 98% of the cases. The cecal intubation rate was 97%, and the overall adenoma detection rate was 26%. Two patients (<1%) experienced complications requiring intervention., Conclusion: The study data indicate that surgeon-performed colonoscopies meet standard quality criteria for indications and performance measures. The authors therefore conclude that surgeon-endoscopists demonstrate proficiency in the standard of care for colonoscopy examinations.