1. Staplers vs. loop-ligature: a cost analysis from the hospital payer perspective
- Author
-
Christopher M. Schlachta, Kelly Vogt, Nadia Khan, and Richard Hilsden
- Subjects
Laparoscopic surgery ,Canada ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,medicine.medical_treatment ,030230 surgery ,Cohort Studies ,03 medical and health sciences ,Postoperative Complications ,Surgical Staplers ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Appendectomy ,Humans ,Hospital Costs ,Disposable Equipment ,Ligature ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,General surgery ,Suture Techniques ,Retrospective cohort study ,Length of Stay ,Appendicitis ,medicine.disease ,Acute appendicitis ,Cost analysis ,Laparoscopy ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Surgery ,Complication ,business ,Abdominal surgery - Abstract
Presently, there is equipoise regarding the surgical technique used to manage the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy. The purpose of this research was to determine whether the routine use of loop ligature, compared to stapling, is cost effective from a hospital payer perspective. A retrospective cohort study was conducted amongst patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis at two major academic hospitals. In order to eliminate possible systematic bias arising from one technique being preferentially employed with more complex presentations, patients were divided into study groups based on the technique routinely employed by their surgeon, loop ligature (LLA) versus stapler (LSA). Pediatric patients and open appendectomies were excluded. Costs were determined using a previously published model derived from publicly available data from the Ontario Case Costing Initiative, in conjunction with local cost data for disposable procurement. Secondary outcomes included operating room time, length of stay, and complication rates. Between Jan 1, 2014 and Dec 31, 2015, 567 adult patients had an emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. In comparing surgeons who routinely employed LLA to LSA, there was a significant decrease in total mean hospital cost with LLA ($1988 ± $143 vs. $2253 ± $99, p = 0.002). In addition, mean disposable cost was reduced for surgeons using LLA ($310 ± $27 vs. $668 ± $26, p
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF