Search

Background: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a novel, minimally invasive treatment for esophageal achalasia. We retrospectively examined and evaluated the results following POEM to verify the technique’s efficacy and safety. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data for patients who underwent POEM at eight Japanese facilities between September 2008 and October 2015. Pre- and postoperative assessments 3 months and 1 year after POEM included patient interviews, endoscopy, and manometry. Results: A total of 1346 patients underwent POEM during the study period. Achalasia was the straight type in 1105 patients (82%) and the sigmoid type in 241 patients (18%). The average patient age was 47.2 years (range 3–95 years); 617 patients (46%) were men and 729 (54%) were women. Previous treatment included balloon dilatation in 381 patients (28%) and Heller–Dor operation in 43 patients (3%). The average operation time was 99.6 min. The mean length of the myotomy in the esophageal body was 10.8 cm, and the myotomy extended into the stomach a mean of 2.8 cm. The response rate (Eckardt score ≤ 3) was 95.1% 3 months postoperatively and 94.7% 1 year postoperatively. We noted 50 adverse events (3.7%) of Clavien–Dindo classification grade ≤ IIIa, and all resolved with conservative treatment. There were no Clavien–Dindo classification grade ≥ IIIb adverse events. After POEM, erosive esophagitis according to the Los Angeles classification was absent in 37% of the patients, grade A in 33%, B in 24%, C in 6%, and D in 0.2%. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease after POEM was confirmed in 14.8% of the patients; both erosive esophagitis and symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease responded to treatment with a proton-pump inhibitor. Conclusion: Our results confirmed the safety and efficacy of POEM in a large patient series and support POEM as the first-line and standard treatment for esophageal achalasia.

Since its introduction in 2010, per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has offered an alternative to laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of achalasia. A gastric myotomy length of 3 cm has been recommended; however, it can be difficult to ensure that adequate submucosal dissection has been performed during the procedure. Commonly accepted endoscopic markers of the gastric side can be inaccurate, particularly in patients with prior endoscopic treatments, such as balloon dilation or Botox injection of the lower esophageal sphincter. We hypothesized that the use of a second endoscope would result in a more complete gastric myotomy. One hundred consecutive achalasia patients were randomized into single- and double-scope POEM groups. In the treatment group, a second endoscope was used to obtain a retroflexed view of the gastric cardia, while the dissecting scope transilluminated from the end of the submucosal tunnel. Prospectively collected data were analyzed, including myotomy lengths, procedure times, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. POEM was completed with high rates of technical (98–100 %) and clinical success (93–97 %) in both groups, with a low rate of serious adverse events (2 %). The second endoscope resulted in a 17 min increase in procedure time (94 vs. 77 min), myotomy extension in 34 % of cases, and an increase in the average gastric myotomy length from 2.6 to 3.2 cm (p= 0.01). A second endoscope is useful for ensuring a complete gastric myotomy during POEM. With minimal increase in procedure time and no increase in morbidity, it may be particularly useful in cases of sigmoid esophagus or otherwise altered anatomy that makes identification of the gastroesophageal junction difficult.