Search

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is equivalent in safety and efficacy to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) while decreasing number of procedures and length of stay (LOS). Despite these advantages LCBDE is infrequently utilized. We hypothesized that formal, simulation-based training in LCBDE would result in increased utilization and improve patient outcomes across participating institutions. Methods: Data was obtained from an on-going multi-center study in which simulator-based transcystic LCBDE training curricula were instituted for attending surgeons and residents. A 2-year retrospective review of LCBDE utilization prior to LCBDE training was compared to utilization up to 2 years after initiation of training. Patient outcomes were analyzed between LCBDE strategy and ERCP strategy groups using χ2, ttests, and Wilcoxon rank tests. Results: A total of 50 attendings and 70 residents trained in LCBDE since November 2020. Initial LCBDE utilization rate ranged from 0.74 to 4.5%, and increased among all institutions after training, ranging from 9.3 to 41.4% of cases. There were 393 choledocholithiasis patients analyzed using LCBDE (N= 129) and ERCP (N= 264) strategies. The LCBDE group had shorter median LOS (3 days vs. 4 days, p< 0.0001). No significant differences in readmission rates between LCBDE and ERCP groups (4.7% vs. 7.2%, p= 0.33), or in post-procedure pancreatitis (0.8% v 0.8%, p> 0.98). In comparison to LCBDE, the ERCP group had higher rates of bile duct injury (0% v 3.8%, p= 0.034) and fluid collections requiring intervention (0.8% v 6.8%, p< 0.009) secondary to cholecystectomy complications. Laparoscopic antegrade balloon sphincteroplasty had the highest technical success rate (87%), followed by choledochoscopic techniques (64%). Conclusion: Simulator-based training in LCBDE results in higher utilization rates, shorter LOS, and comparable safety to ERCP plus cholecystectomy. Therefore, implementation of LCBDE training is strongly recommended to optimize healthcare utilization and management of patients with choledocholithiasis.

Background: Per-oral plication of the (neo)esophagus (POPE) is an endoscopic procedure used to improve emptying of the defunctionalized esophagus or gastric conduit, with the hope of improving symptoms and quality of life. As this procedure has only been performed in the United States for the past 4 years, safety and efficacy have not been well established. Methods: This is a retrospective case series for patients who underwent POPE from a single institution between 2019 and 2023. Data collected included demographics, preoperative diagnoses and treatments, imaging, endoscopic data, operative intervention, 90-day complications, and response to treatment. Quality of life and patient satisfaction data were collected by phone survey. Results: Seventeen cases were identified, encompassing 13 primary procedures and 4 repeat POPEs (re-POPE). Eight patients had end-stage achalasia and 5 had impaired gastric emptying after esophagectomy with gastric conduits. Median age was 65 years and median ASA was 3, with 38.5% female patients. POPE was performed with 2–6 plication sutures in an average of 75 min. The majority of patients discharged home the same day. For the 17 procedures, there were 4 complications. Two patients required antibiotics for pneumonia, while 4 required procedural intervention. There were no deaths. Preoperative symptoms improved or resolved at initial follow up in 82.3% of patients. Four patients experienced symptom recurrence and required re-POPE, 1 with achalasia and 3 with gastric conduits. Although all achalasia patients had an “end-stage esophagus,” none have required esophagectomy since the introduction of POPE. Conclusions: POPE is an endoscopic procedure that is efficacious in relieving emptying difficulties for the end-stage esophagus and gastric conduit. It may obviate the need for esophagectomy or conduit replacement. Also, it can be repeated in select patients. While the risk profile of complications is favorable compared to alternative operations, patients with gastric conduits are at higher risk.

Introduction: Numerous studies comment on quality of life outcomes comparing complete and partial fundoplication with or without a bougie. Society guidelines are moving toward recommending partial fundoplication over complete fundoplication due to improved side effect profile with similar outcomes. Retrospective studies and randomized trials have elucidated that use of a bougie during Nissen fundoplication does impact long-term dysphagia. To date there are no retrospective or prospective data that guide practice for partial fundoplications. Objective: The purpose of this project is to investigate the clinical implications of using a bougie for Toupet fundoplication with regard to short-term and long-term dysphagia and need for further therapeutic interventions. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained gastroesophageal database was performed. Demographic, pre-operative quality of life outcomes data, perioperative, and post-operative quality of life outcomes data of 373 patients from 2011 to 2022 undergoing Toupet fundoplication without bougie or with a traditional Savary 56Fr or 58Fr bougie were reviewed. The two groups were compared using student’s t-test to identify statically significant differences between the groups. Results: Between 2011 and 2022, 373 patients underwent Toupet fundoplication (276 with traditional bougie, 97 without). Median follow-up in the bougie group was 19 months, versus 9 months in the non bougie group. There was no difference between early (3 weeks) and late dysphagia scores (6 months). In the bougie group there were two mucosal perforations due to the bougie. There were no statistically significant differences in GERD-HRQL, gas bloat, and dysphagia scores between groups at one year. Conclusion: There is no difference observed in early or late dysphagia scores, GERD-HRQL, gas bloat or need for dilation in patients undergoing Toupet fundoplication with or without a traditional bougie. It is reasonable to discontinue the use of a traditional bougie during Toupet fundoplication, especially due to risk of esophageal perforation.

Background: Endoluminal functional impedance planimetry and panometry assesses secondary peristalsis in response to volumetric distention under sedation. We hypothesize that impedance planimetry and panometry can replace high-resolution manometry in the preoperative assessment prior to anti-reflux surgery. Methods: Single institution prospective data were collected from patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery between 2021 and 2023. A 16-cm functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) assessed planimetry and panometry prior to surgery under general anesthesia at the start of each case. Panometry was recorded and esophageal contractile response was classified as normal (NCR), diminished or disordered (DDCR), or absent (ACR) in real time by a single panometry rater, blinded to preoperative HRM results. FLIP results were then compared to preoperative HRM. Results: Data were collected from 120 patients, 70.8% female, with mean age of 63 ± 3 years. There were 105 patients with intraoperative panometry, and 15 with panometry collected during preoperative endoscopy. There were 60 patients (50%) who had peristaltic dysfunction on HRM, of whom 57 had FLIP dysmotility (55 DDCR, 2 ACR) resulting in 95.0% sensitivity. There were 3 patients with normal secondary peristalsis on FLIP with abnormal HRM, all ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). No major motility disorder was missed by FLIP. A negative predictive value of 91.9% was calculated from 34/37 patients with normal FLIP panometry and normal HRM. Patients with normal HRM but abnormal FLIP had larger hernias compared to patients with concordant studies (7.5 ± 2.8 cm vs. 5.4 ± 3.2 cm, p= 0.043) and higher preoperative dysphagia scores (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 1.1 ± 0.3, p= 0.021). Conclusion: Impedance planimetry and panometry can assess motility under general anesthesia or sedation and is highly sensitive to peristaltic dysfunction. Panometry is a novel tool that has potential to streamline and improve patient care and therefore should be considered as an alternative to HRM, especially in patients in which HRM would be inaccessible or poorly tolerated.

Background: Mesh reinforced cruroplasty during laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair remains controversial due to wide variation in surgical technique and mesh composition. This study aims to review outcomes and rates of recurrence following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR) with mesh reinforced cruroplasty utilizing absorbable mesh at a single institution. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent LPEHR with mesh was performed. Medical records were reviewed for patient reported, radiographic or endoscopic evidence of recurrence, defined as > 2 cm of vertical intrathoracic stomach. If no studies were available for review, patients were considered to have no recurrence. Outcomes and mesh-related complications were also reviewed. Results: Between 10/2008 and 9/2021, 473 patients underwent LPEHR with absorbable mesh; 1.3% type 2 hernias, 86.0% type 3 hernias, 12.7% type 4 hernias. Three types of mesh were used: initially biologic mesh (n= 83), then heavyweight synthetic bioabsorbable mesh (n= 261), and finally lightweight synthetic bioabsorbable mesh (n= 111). There were no significant differences in age, ASA, BMI, gender, smoking status, chronic steroid use, preoperative acid suppression, hernia type, or recurrent hernia between groups. There were no significant differences in 30-day postoperative outcomes. Reflux Symptom Index, GERD-HRQL, and Dysphagia Scores at 1- and 2-year postoperative timepoints were not significantly different. The overall recurrence rate was 16.7%, with no significant differences in recurrence rates between biologic, heavyweight or lightweight biosynthetic absorbable mesh through 2 years after surgery. A shorter median time to recurrence (10 months, p= 0.016) was seen in the lightweight group. Conclusion: LPEHR with absorbable mesh reinforced cruroplasty is feasible and safe, with equivalent patient-reported outcomes, including dysphagia, up to 2-years postop regardless of mesh choice. No significant differences in recurrence rates between biologic, heavyweight, or lightweight synthetic bioabsorbable mesh were seen up to 2 years after LPEHR.

Background: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a mainstay of treatment for achalasia. Tailored myotomy based on compliance, as measured with impedance planimetry (FLIP), has yet to be described. In this study we describe the associations between Eckardt score, postoperative GERD, and compliance. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed, evaluating patients who underwent POEM and intraoperative FLIP between January 2019 and November 2021. Group comparisons were made using two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher’s exact tests. Spearman’s correlation coefficients (r) were used to assess the relationship between compliance and outcomes, all with two-tailed statistical significance of p< 0.05. Results: Thirty five patients underwent POEM with intraoperative FLIP. At a 30 mL and 40 mL fill, respectively, compliance increased by 80% (180 ± 152%) and 77% (177 ± 131%) from pre to post myotomy. Mean Eckardt score improved from 5.5 ± 2.6 preoperatively to 1.3 ± 1.6 and 1.8 ± 1.9 at first and second follow up, respectively. Median times to first and second follow up were 22 days (IQR 16–23) and 65 days (IQR 58–142). A higher compliance at 40 mL fill was moderately associated with lower Eckardt score at first (r= −0.49, p= 0.012) and second (r= −0.64, p= 0.014) follow up. Post myotomy compliance ≥ 125 mm3/mmHg at 40 mL fill was associated with lower Eckardt scores, < 3, at first (0.4 ± 0.5 vs 1.8 ± 1.3, p= 0.008) and second (0.4 ± 0.5, vs 2.0 ± 1.4, p= 0.027) follow up. Compliance ≥ 125 mm3/mmHg performed better than previously defined ideal ranges of DI and CSA in predicting postoperative Eckardt scores. Compliance was not significantly associated with development of postoperative GERD. Conclusions: A target post myotomy compliance of ≥ 125 mm3/mmHg at a 40 mL fill is associated with normal Eckardt scores at first and second postoperative visits, and performs better than previously defined ideal ranges of DI and CSA in predicting post-operative Eckardt scores. Compliance is a poor predictor of developing GERD after POEM.

Background: As flexible endoscopy becomes an increasingly valuable minimally invasive approach to surgical challenges, an efficient and comprehensive training curriculum is needed to train surgeons in therapeutic endoscopy. We developed a modular curriculum utilizing a simulation-based, “into the fire” approach to endoscopic foreign body removal for practicing physicians with task performance pre- and post-testing. Methods: From 2020 to 2021, two sessions of our advanced flexible endoscopy course were taught by two expert surgical endoscopists using ex-vivo porcine models. The course focused on safe removal techniques for various foreign bodies as part of an overall endoscopy curriculum that uses hands-on simulation-based pre-testing, didactics, and mentored practice sessions, followed by post-course examination. Pre- and post-course assessments and surveys were used to evaluate knowledge, performance, and confidence of participants, and subsequently analyzed using the Wilcoxon-signed rank test. Results: Of the 16 practicing physicians who participated in the course, 43.8% were certified in Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery, and 62.5% had completed > 200 prior upper endoscopies. Upon course completion, scoring on knowledge-based written examinations improved from 3.4 ± 1.9 to 5.8 ± 2.0 (p< 0.001). Technical facility of each participant demonstrated significant overall improvement with post-course score increased from 15.8 ± 2.5 to 23.6 ± 1.6 (p< 0.001), with skill refinement noted in technical subcategories of appropriate instrument use (p< 0.001), foreign body manipulation (p< 0.001), and successful foreign body removal (p< 0.001). Confidence surveys likewise demonstrated significant increase in confidence after completion of the curriculum 11.6 ± 3.4 to 23.0 ± 5.5 (p< 0.001). Conclusions: The “into the fire” approach to teaching endoscopic foreign body removal utilizing our simulation module provides an effective curriculum to improve knowledge, confidence, and overall technical performance. Our methodology utilizes hands-on, simulation-based pre-testing prior to instruction. This introduces clinical scenarios and technical challenges, while accounting for and tailoring to provider-specific variation in knowledge and experience, facilitating training efficiency.

Introduction: Impedance planimetry (FLIP) provides objective feedback to optimize fundoplication outcomes. Ideal FLIP ranges for differing wraps and bougies have not yet been established. We report FLIP measurements during fundoplication grouped by choice of wrap and bougie with associated outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospective gastroesophageal database was performed for all Nissen or Toupet fundoplication with intraoperative FLIP using an 8-cm catheter, 30-mL and/or 40-mL fill and/or 16-cm catheter, 60-mL fill. Surgeons used no bougie, the FLIP balloon as bougie, or a hard bougie. Outcomes included perioperative data, Reflux Symptom Index, GERD-HRQL, Dysphagia scores, need for dilation, postoperative EGD findings, and hernia recurrence. Group comparisons were made using two-tailed Kruskal–Wallis and Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Between 2016 and 2022, 333 patients underwent fundoplication and intraoperative FLIP. Procedures included Toupet with hard bougie (TFHB, N= 147), Toupet with FLIP bougie (TFFB, N= 69), Toupet without bougie (TFNB, N= 78), Nissen with hard bougie (NFHB, n= 20), or Nissen with FLIP bougie (NFFB, N= 19). FLIP measurements at 30-mL/40-mL fills varied significantly between groups, notably distensibility index at crural closure (CCDI) and post-fundoplication (FDI). No significant differences in FLIP measurements were seen between those who developed poor postoperative outcomes and those who did not, including when grouping by choice of wrap and bougie. At a 40-mL fill, abnormal motility patients with CCDI > 3.5 mm2/mmHg developed zero postoperative dysphagia. TFFB abnormal motility patients with CCDI > 3.5 mm2/mmHg or FDI > 3.6 mm2/mmHg developed zero postoperative dysphagia. Conclusion: Intraoperative FLIP measurements vary by fundoplication and bougie choice. A CCDI > 3.5 mm2/mmHg (40 mL fill) should be sought in abnormal motility patients, regardless of wrap or bougie, to avoid postoperative dysphagia. TFFB abnormal motility patients with FDI > 3.6 mm2/mmHg (40 mL fill) also developed zero postoperative dysphagia. FDI > 6.2 mm2/mmHg (40 mL fill) was seen in all postoperative hernia recurrences.

Background: Criteria to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) vary. The American Gastroenterology Association (AGA) 2022 Expert Review on GERD focuses on acid exposure time (AET) rather than DeMeester score from ambulatory pH testing (BRAVO). We aim to review outcomes following anti-reflux surgery (ARS) at our institution, grouped by differing criteria for the diagnosis of GERD. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospective gastroesophageal quality database was performed for all patients undergoing evaluation for ARS with preoperative BRAVO ≥ 48 h. Group comparisons were made using two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher’s exact tests and two-tailed statistical significance of p< 0.05. Results: Between 2010 and 2022, 253 patients underwent an evaluation for ARS with BRAVO testing. Most patients (86.9%) met our institution’s historical criteria: LA C/D esophagitis, Barrett’s, or DeMeester ≥ 14.72 on 1+ days. Fewer patients (67.2%) met new AGA criteria: LA B/C/D esophagitis, Barrett’s, or AET ≥ 6% on 2+ days. Sixty-one patients (24%) met historical criteria only, with significantly lower BMI, ASA, less hiatal hernias, and less DeMeester and AET-positive days, a less severe GERD phenotype. There were no differences between groups in perioperative outcomes or % symptom resolution. Objective GERD outcomes (need for dilation, esophagitis, and postop BRAVO) were equivalent between groups. Patient-reported quality of life scores, including GERD-HRQL, RSI, and Dysphagia Score did not differ between groups from preop through 1 year postop. Those who met our historical criteria only reported significantly worse RSI scores (p= 0.03) and worse GERD-HRQL scores at 2 years postop, though not statistically significant (p= 0.07). Conclusion: Updated AGA GERD guidelines exclude a portion of patients who historically would have been diagnosed with and surgically treated for GERD. This cohort appears to have a less severe GERD phenotype but equivalent outcomes up to 1 year, with more atypical GERD symptoms at 2 years postop. AET may better define who should be offered ARS than DeMeester score.

Background: Despite the advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, major bile duct injury (BDI) rates during this operation remain unacceptably high. In October 2018, SAGES released the Safe Cholecystectomy modules, which define specific strategies to minimize the risk of BDI. This study aims to investigate whether this curriculum can change the knowledge and behaviors of surgeons in practice. Methods: Practicing surgeons were recruited from the membership of SAGES and the American College of Surgeons Advisory Council for Rural Surgery. All participants completed a baseline assessment (pre-test) that involved interpreting cholangiograms, troubleshooting difficult cases, and managing BDI. Participants' dissection strategies during cholecystectomy were also compared to the strategies of a panel of 15 experts based on accuracy scores using the Think Like a Surgeon validated web-based platform. Participants were then randomized to complete the Safe Cholecystectomy modules (Safe Chole module group) or participate in usually scheduled CME activities (control group). Both groups completed repeat assessments (post-tests) one month after randomization. Results: Overall, 41 participants were eligible for analysis, including 18 Safe Chole module participants and 23 controls. The two groups had no significant differences in pre-test scores. However, at post-test, Safe Chole module participants made significantly fewer errors managing BDI and interpreting cholangiograms. Safe Chole module participants were less likely to convert to an open operation on the post-test than controls when facing challenging dissections. However, Safe Chole module participants displayed a similar incidence of errors when evaluating adequate critical views of safety. Conclusions: In this randomized-controlled trial, the SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy modules improved surgeons' abilities to interpret cholangiograms and safely manage BDI. Additionally, surgeons who studied the modules were less likely to convert to open during difficult dissections. These data show the power of the Safe Cholecystectomy modules to affect practicing surgeons' behaviors in a measurable and meaningful way.

Background: Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is a new endoscopic procedure involving a hemi-circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) around the gastroesophageal junction. We aim to compare perioperative and quality of life outcomes of patients with reflux who underwent ARMS to a comparable group who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (NF). Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained quality database was performed. All patients who underwent ARMS (n = 33) were matched with patients who underwent NF (n = 67). Clinical and quality of life (QOL) outcomes were collected preoperatively and up to two years postoperatively, measured by the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL), and Dysphagia Score. Outcomes were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher’s exact test. Results: While 10 patients (30.3%) who underwent ARMS required additional laparoscopic anti-reflux operations, the ARMS group had shorter OR time (p<0.001), less estimated blood loss (p<0.001), shorter hospital stay (p<0.001), less pain at discharge (p = 0.007), earlier narcotic discontinuation (p<0.001), and earlier return to activities of daily living (p<0.001) compared to the NF group. There was no difference in 30-day complication rates, emergency room visits, or readmission rates between the groups. There was no difference between ARMS and NF groups in terms of GERD-HRQL, RSI, or Dysphagia scores at 3 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, or 2 years postoperatively. However, the ARMS group reported less symptoms of gas and bloating postoperatively at all time points (all p<0.05). Both groups reported increased dysphagia at 3 weeks postoperatively (p<0.01) but this did not persist at 6 months, 1 year, or 2 years. Conclusion: While ARMS had better perioperative outcomes compared to NF, reflux quality of life outcomes were comparable. ARMS can be an effective endoscopic intervention for GERD when performed on appropriately selected patients without limiting future laparoscopic anti-reflux interventions.

Introduction: The Endoluminal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (Endoflip) can be used to provide objective measurements of the gastroesophageal junction during fundoplication, and recent publications have suggested that this device could improve surgical outcomes. However, the impact of operative variables has not been clearly reported. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of these variables on functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) measurements. Methods: Following implementation of a standardized operative FLIP protocol, all data were collected prospectively and entered into a quality database. This database was queried for patients undergoing hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication. The protocol utilized various balloon volumes (30 and 40 ml), patient positions (flat and reverse Trendelenburg) and amounts of insufflation (15 mmHg pneumoperitoneum and no pneumoperitoneum). Results: Between August 2018 and February 2020, 97 fundoplications were performed by a single surgeon. Multivariable analysis without interactions demonstrated that a 40 ml volume fill resulted in significantly higher minimum diameter (Dmin), cross-sectional area (CSA), intra-balloon pressure (IBP) and distensibility index (DI) compared to a 30 ml volume fill (p< 0.001). While reverse Trendelenburg positioning resulted in a significantly higher Dmin, IBP and CSA compared to the flat position (all p< 0.05), there was little impact of positioning on DI. Lastly, pneumoperitoneum significantly increased IBP (p< 0.001) but did not affect Dmin (p= 0.697) or CSA (p= 0.757), which resulted in a significant decrease in DI (p< 0.001) when compared to measurements without pneumoperitoneum. Multivariable analysis allowing for interactions demonstrated significant two-way interactions between balloon volume and pneumoperitoneum (p= 0.047), as well as patient position and pneumoperitoneum (p< 0.001). Conclusion: Surgeons should consider balloon volume and the presence or absence of pneumoperitoneum when interpreting distensibility during or after fundoplication. Additionally, we suggest a formal standardized protocol for FLIP measurements to utilize a 40 ml volume fill in reverse Trendelenburg without pneumoperitoneum.

Introduction: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive treatment for achalasia. Considerable evidence demonstrates a high incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after POEM. The endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) uses impedance planimetry to obtain objective measurements of the gastroesophageal junction. This study aims to determine whether FLIP measurements collected at the time of POEM are associated with the development of reflux esophagitis postoperatively. Methods: Patients who underwent POEM between 2012 and 2019 who subsequently had esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were included. Intraoperative FLIP measurements before and after myotomy, clinical data from EGD, and reflux specific quality of life questionnaires were collected. Comparisons between groups were made using the Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher’s exact tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine optimal cutoffs of measurements to classify patients into those with high risk of postoperative esophagitis and those with lower risk. Results: A total of 43 patients were included. Of those, 25 (58.1%) were found to have esophagitis on postoperative EGD: four patients (16%) with LA Grade A, five (20%) with LA Grade B, 11 (44%) with LA Grade C and two (8%) with LA grade D esophagitis. Patients with a final distensibility index ≥ 2.7 and a final cross-sectional area ≥ 83 were significantly more likely to develop esophagitis on postoperative EGD (p= 0.016 and p= 0.008, respectively). Gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) and reflux symptom index (RSI) scores were not significantly different in patients who developed esophagitis and those who did not. Conclusion: Reflux affects some patients after POEM. We show that FLIP measurements collected during POEM may help predict which patients are more likely to develop reflux esophagitis postoperatively. Subjective symptoms on quality of life questionnaires are not reliable in determining which patients are at risk for esophagitis.

Background: Although peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as a highly efficacious procedure in the treatment of a variety of esophageal motility disorders, currently no standard pathway for postprocedural care exists. Our study aims to report institutional outcomes in performing POEM as an outpatient procedure with same-day discharge. Additionally, we seek to determine factors associated with admission. Methods: Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative outcome data of 115 patients who underwent POEM between June 2014 and January 2020 on a same-day discharge pathway were analyzed. Cohorts were compared using the t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum, or chi-square test. Multivariable logistic regression with a manual backward selection method was used to identify factors associated with admission. Results: Fifty-five patients (48%) were successfully discharged same-day. The most common primary reasons for admission were delay in obtaining an esophagram (25%), intraoperative complication (13.3%), and pain (10%). There were no differences in 30-day ED visit rate (12.7% vs 15.0%, p= 0.725) or 30-day readmission rate (9.1% vs 16.7%, p= 0.373) between patients who were discharged same-day versus patients who were admitted. Patients discharged same-day had fewer intraoperative complications (1 vs 9, p= 0.017), shorter OR time (69 vs 100 min, p< 0.001), and earlier cessation of narcotic use (day 0 vs day 1, p= 0.001). On multivariable analysis, intraoperative complication (p= 0.048) was associated with overnight admission. Conclusion: Patients did not experience additional morbidity with same-day discharge after POEM. A delay in obtaining an esophagram was the most common reason that patients were admitted and those who suffered an intraoperative complication are more likely to require admission.

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of using a functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP™) intra-operatively during hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication. Additionally, we hypothesize that these measurements correlate with long-term outcomes. Methods: A prospectively maintained quality database was queried. Between 2013 and 2018, 175 patients underwent laparoscopic fundoplication, the majority of which also had a hiatal hernia repair. The EndoFLIP™ was used to measure minimum diameter (Dmin), balloon pressure, and distensibility index (DI) at different timepoints throughout the operation. Clinical outcomes were measured up to 2 years after treatment. Results: Crural closure and fundoplication resulted in a significant increase in balloon pressure and decrease in DI when compared to initial measurements as well as measurements taken after hernia reduction. After 1 year, patients with a final DI < 2.0 mm2/mmHg reported significantly more gas bloat and dysphagia than those with a final DI ≥ 2.0 mm2/mmHg (p= 0.040 and p= 0.025, respectively). This disparity became even more dramatic at 2 years (p= 0.006 and p= 0.004, respectively), with a final DI < 2.0 mm2/mmHg being significantly associated with higher prevalence of daily gas bloat (43.8% vs. 12.0%; p= 0.03). Additionally, patients with a final DI between 2.0 and 3.5 mm2/mmHg reported significantly lower Reflux Symptom Index scores at one year compared to those with a final DI < 2.0 or > 3.5 mm2/mmHg (p= 0.042). Conclusion: EndoFLIP™ measurements correlate well with patient outcomes, with a final DI between 2 and 3.5 mm2/mmHg potentially being ideal. The EndoFLIP™ can be a useful adjunct in the operating room by providing objective measurements of esophageal distensibility after crural closure and fundoplication.