1. Modified peroral endoscopic myotomy technique with retrograde on-demand myotomy for achalasia: a retrospective cohort study (with video).
- Author
-
Cao, Tingting, Sun, Haibo, Yang, Dong, Tao, Ke, Tang, Ying, Fu, Yingli, and Xu, Hong
- Subjects
POSTOPERATIVE care ,PEARSON correlation (Statistics) ,PATIENT safety ,T-test (Statistics) ,FISHER exact test ,MYOTOMY ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,RETROSPECTIVE studies ,MANN Whitney U Test ,CHI-squared test ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,DIGESTIVE organ surgery ,INTUBATION ,LONGITUDINAL method ,SURGICAL complications ,MEDICAL records ,ACQUISITION of data ,MEDICAL appointments ,ESOPHAGEAL achalasia ,ADVERSE health care events ,COMPARATIVE studies ,DATA analysis software ,ESOPHAGUS ,GASTROESOPHAGEAL reflux ,EVALUATION - Abstract
Background: Although myotomy is crucial in peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) surgeries, its optimum length remains controversial. Herein, we propose a modified POEM with new method of tailoring myotomy length aim to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of this modified POEM compared with standard POEM in type I or II achalasia. Methods: Seventy-five patients with type I or II achalasia who underwent POEM at the First Hospital of Jilin University between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the myotomy approach, these patients were divided into the retrograde on-demand myotomy (RDM, n = 34), with myotomy beginning on gastric side and length tailored by determining the degree of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) distention, and standard myotomy (SM, n = 41) groups. The baseline data, myotomy length, operation time, clinical success rate, adverse event rate, and reflux-related adverse events were compared and analyzed. Results: The median myotomy length in the RDM group was significantly shorter than that in the SM group (6 vs. 8 cm, respectively; p < 0.001). Moreover, the median myotomy time in the RDM group was significantly shorter than that in the SM group (10 vs. 16 min, respectively; p < 0.001). POEM was successfully performed in all the patients. At the 2-year follow-up, high clinical success rates were observed in both the RDM and SM groups (92.0% vs. 93.3%, respectively; p = 1.000). The incidence of intraoperative adverse events and postoperative reflux-related adverse events was low and comparable in both groups. Conclusions: RDM POEM is a safe and effective method for patients with type I or II achalasia. Furthermore, it has a shorter myotomy length and operation time than standard POEM technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF