Search

Background: The Radius Surgical System is a manual manipulator with two additional degrees of freedom compared with conventional laparoscopic instruments (CLIs). This study aimed to compare the performance of laparoscopic suturing tasks with the use of the Radius Surgical System and CLIs, respectively.Methods: Five experienced laparoscopic surgeons performed laparoscopic surgical tasks in a training box. The tasks consisted of knot-tying, suturing, and needle control tasks. The needle control task was performed to evaluate the precision of the needle drive by analysis of the needle exit point on a suture pad. In the knot-tying and suturing tasks, required time and accuracy value were measured. Needle control tasks were performed on three different angulations of plane. The angles between the instrument plane and the target plane (AIT) were 30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees. The distance of the exit point to the center of the target field, the number of actions needed to fulfill a single task, and the required time were recorded and analyzed.Results: In the knot-tying and frontal suturing tasks, there were no significant differences between the two groups. In the sagittal suturing task, the required time in the Radius group was significantly shorter than in the CLI group. In the needle control tasks on 30 degree and 60 degree AIT, the distance was significantly shorter in the Radius group than in the CLI group. There were no significant differences in the number of actions or the required time. In the frontal and sagittal needle control task on 90 degree AIT, the distance was significantly shorter in the Radius group than in the CLI group. The number of actions and the required time were significantly less in the Radius group than in the CLI group.Conclusions: The two additional degrees of freedom contributed to accurate and controlled needle guidance, especially in difficult spatial situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This investigation, using the nerve conduction study, aimed to quantify the degree of laparoscopic surgeon's thumb, and to evaluate the effect of the ringed silicon rubber attachment (RSRA) developed by the authors.Methods: For the study, 26 residents or students performed surgical tasks (grasping and dissecting) using both the laparoscopic forceps with RSRA and the conventional instrument. The paresthesia was evaluated with a severity score obtained by interview and measurement of sensory nerve conduction velocity (SCV).Results: The mean severity score was 2.57 +/- 0.58 m/s for the conventional forceps and 1.05 +/- 0.80 m/s for the forceps with RSRA (p < 0.01). For the grasping task with the conventional forceps, the mean SCV was 58.3 +/- 2.81 m/s before and 54.8 +/- 2.83 m/s after the task (p < 0.01), whereas for the dissecting task, the corresponding values were 57.5 +/- 2.46 m/s and 56.1 +/- 2.93 m/s (p < 0.01). For the grasping task with the RSRA, the mean SCV was 57.1 +/- 3.33 m/s before and 55.9 +/- 3.18 m/s after the task (p < 0.01), whereas for the dissecting task, the corresponding values were 55.7 +/- 4.59 m/s and 55.8 +/- 3.50 m/s (nonsignificant difference).Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgeon's thumb was induced by compression of the lateral digital nerve. The RSRA significantly reduced the degree of paresthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A detailed ergonomic comparison of motions and muscular activity in the left upper extremity using a laparoscopic straight or curved grasper in rectosigmoid resection is presented.Methods: The study had two parts: experimental and clinical. In the experiment part, 30 laparoscopic sigmoid resections were performed under animal organ phantom conditions. The operations were divided into three groups according to instrument and trocar position. Group 1 (n = 10) underwent operations performed with a curved grasper in the excentral trocar position (in relation to the telescope trocar), with the left-hand curved grasper placed in the right flank and the right hand instrument in the right lower quadrant. In group 2 (n = 10), straight forceps were used in the excentral trocar position. Group 3 (n = 10) underwent laparoscopic sigmoid resection performed with a straight grasper in the central position (in relation to the telescope trocar), with the instruments placed at both sides of the lower abdomen. To measure ergonomic aspects during rectosigmoid resection, several overview video cameras, surface electromyography (EMG), an ultrasound tracking system (UTS), and a questionnaire were used. In the clinical part of the study, laparoscopic rectosigmoid resections (n = 5) were performed using a curved instrument in the excentral trocar position. The surgeon's left-hand movement and body posture were recorded for further analysis.Results: The curved grasper required the fewest contractions (group 1) of the measured muscles. A comparison of the UTS analysis in the experimental part of the study and the video analysis in the clinical part showed economy of movements in group 1. According to subjective estimation, both physical activity and mental stress remain at the lowest level when the excentral trocar position is used (groups 1 and 2).Conclusions: The combination of the curved grasper and the excentral trocar position (in relation to the telescope trocar) is, according to our examinations, the best ergonomic adjustment for laparoscopic rectosigmoid surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Laparoscopic mesh fixation using a stapler can lead to complications such as nerve injury and bowel injury. However, mesh fixation by suturing with conventional laparoscopic instruments (CLI) is difficult because of limited degrees of freedom. A manual manipulator--Radius Surgical System (Radius)--whose tip can deflect and rotate, gives the surgeon two additional degrees of freedom. The aim of this study is to evaluate the introduction of Radius to mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.Methods: A model for inguinal hernia repair was prepared using animal organs in a trainer. Mesh fixation was performed using Radius, stapler, and CLI. Tensile strength during extraction of mesh toward the vertical direction, and execution time, were measured.Results: The mean number of fixation points of Radius, stapler, and CLI was 9.3 +/- 1.5, 8.5 +/- 1.4, and 9.0 +/- 1.0, respectively. The mean tensile strength of fixation of mesh of Radius, stapler, and CLI was 140.7 +/- 48.9, 73.1 +/- 23.4, and 53.6 +/- 31.5 (N), respectively. The mean tensile strength per one fixation point by Radius, stapler, and CLI was 16.5 +/- 5.3, 8.7 +/- 2.8, and 6.3 +/- 3.6 (N), respectively. The mean execution time of Radius, stapler, and CLI was 479 +/- 108, 54 +/- 31, and 431 +/- 77 (sec), respectively.Conclusions: The mesh fixation by Radius was stronger than that by staples and CLI. Two additional degrees of freedom were useful in difficult angles. The introduction of Radius is feasible and facilitates the fixation of mesh with sutures in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A correction in the author's name of the article "Laparoscopic intracorporal colorectal sutured anastomosis using the Radius Surgical System in a phantom model", published in the previous issue of the journal is presented.