1. Comparison of two intraductal brush cytology devices for suspected malignant biliary strictures: randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Gorris, Myrte, van Huijgevoort, Nadine C. M., Fockens, Paul, Meijer, Sybren L., Verheij, Joanne, Voermans, Rogier P., van Wanrooij, Roy L. J., Lekkerkerker, Selma J., and van Hooft, Jeanin E.
- Subjects
RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,CYTOLOGY ,ENDOSCOPIC retrograde cholangiopancreatography - Abstract
Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with biliary brush cytology is commonly used to diagnose malignant pancreatobiliary strictures. This trial compared the sensitivity of two intraductal brush cytology devices. Methods: A randomized controlled trial in which consecutive patients with suspected malignant, extrahepatic biliary strictures were randomized (1:1) to a dense or conventional brush cytology device. Primary endpoint was sensitivity. Interim analysis was conducted after 50% of the patients completed follow-up. Results were interpreted by a data safety monitoring board. Results: Between June 2016 and June 2021, 64 patients were randomized to the dense (27 patients, 42%) or conventional brush (37 patients, 58%). Malignancy was diagnosed in 60 patients (94%) and benign disease in 4 patients (6%). Diagnoses were confirmed by histopathology in 34 patients (53%), cytopathology in 24 patients (38%), and clinical or radiological follow up in 6 patients (9%). Sensitivity of the dense brush was 50%, compared to 44% for the conventional brush (p = 0·785). Discussion: The results of this randomized controlled trial showed that the sensitivity of a dense brush is not superior to a conventional brush for diagnosing malignant extrahepatic pancreatobiliary strictures. This trial was prematurely ended for reasons of futility. Trial registration: Netherlands Trial Register number; NTR5458. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF