Search

Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major complication after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction. This retrospective study aims to reveal the factors in prevention of AL and in reduction of its severity., Methods: Enrolled in this study were the 183 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy followed by narrow gastric tube reconstruction at Wakayama Medical University Hospital between January 2018 and March 2023. Evaluation of blood perfusion using indocyanine green began in September 2020., Results: AL occurred in 42 patients (22%) and did not occur in 141 patients (78%). Patient characteristics were not significantly different between patients with and without AL. Evaluation of blood perfusion of the gastric tube was performed in 69 of the 183 patients (37.7%), and after its introduction the rates of AL decreased from 28.0% to 14.4%. Blood perfusion was less evaluated in the AL group than in the non-AL group (23.8% vs. 41.8%, P=0.034). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that non-evaluation of blood perfusion using indocyanine green (odds=3.115) was an independent risk factor for AL. For the patients with AL, active interventions (eg, tube insertion into the gastric tube through the nose or fistula, embolization of cyanoacrylate) were performed significantly more often in the group without evaluation of blood perfusion than in the group with evaluation. Without evaluation of blood perfusion, there was significantly longer time from onset to resumption of diet and significantly longer postoperative hospital stays., Conclusions: Evaluation of qualitative blood perfusion can lead to both risk reduction and prevention of severe AL after narrow gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The long-term outcomes of gastric tube cancer (GTC) are unclear. This study therefore aimed to clarify clinicopathologic features and the long-term outcomes of patients with GTC., Methods: The 25 patients who were diagnosed with GTC between April 2003 and December 2022 at our hospital were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study, and this included 27 lesions. We retrospectively evaluated clinicopathologic factors based on hospital records., Results: In our cohort, 88% of incidences of GTC were located in the middle or lower gastric tube. As the treatment of GTC, we used endoscopic submucosal dissection, gastrectomy, chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy, and best supportive care for 16 (59%), 6 (22%), 1 (4%), 1 (4%), and 3 (11%) lesions, respectively. Perforation after endoscopic submucosal dissection was observed in 6 of the 16 lesions. Partial gastric tube resection was performed for 3 patients and total gastric tube resection was performed for 3 patients. One patient who underwent total gastric tube resection died due to acute respiratory distress syndrome. In survival analysis, the 3-year overall survival rate was 52% and the 3-year disease-specific survival rate was 74%. Five patients (20%) died of aspiration pneumonia, 2 patients (8%) of another disease, and 1 patient (4%) of another type of cancer. According to multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for overall survival were cN status (HR, 18.021; P =0.004) and complication of aspiration pneumonia (HR, 8.373; P =0.004)., Conclusions: The occurrence of aspiration pneumonia and cN status were prognostic factors after the treatment for GTC. Assessment of dysphagia and surveillance after treatment for GTC are important to improve the prognosis., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We investigated that double-tract reconstruction (DTR) may be more beneficial than esophagogastrostomy (EG) with fundoplication in terms of nutritional outcomes, focusing on loss of body weight., Materials and Methods: This study included 56 consecutive patients with early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach who received laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy, 39 underwent EG. In the 17 patients requiring resection of the abdominal esophagus or where the size of the remnant stomach was 50% or less, we performed DTR., Results: There was no significant difference in the rate of body weight change at 6 or 12 months, or in biochemical markers (hemoglobin, total protein, and albumin) at 12 months. However, 8 patients in the EG group had extreme body weight loss (≥20%) within 12 months. Conversely, in the DTR group, no patients had any extreme body weight loss., Conclusion: DTR is useful after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy, especially in terms of preventing extreme body weight loss., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The authors outline their stapling technique and retrospectively compare outcomes of laparoscopic staplers versus robotic staplers in patients undergoing robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) with Billroth I gastroduodenostomy for gastric cancers., Materials and Methods: Of our 28 consecutive patients who underwent RDG, 18 underwent Billroth I gastroduodenostomy using laparoscopic staplers (fusion group); robotic staplers were used in the remaining 10 patients (robot group). All RDG procedures were performed using the da Vinci Surgical System., Results: The duration of reconstruction was significantly longer for the robot group than for the fusion group. There were no conversions to conventional laparoscopy or open surgery in the fusion group, but 1 patient in the robot group required conversion to laparoscopic reconstruction for duodenal injury during anastomosis. No postoperative complications developed in the fusion group., Conclusion: Regarding short-term surgical outcomes, robotic-assisted laparoscopic stapling techniques for reconstruction after RDG are both feasible and safe for gastric cancers.