Search

• Application of the EU circular economy monitoring framework at the urban level. • Mapping of data sources and evaluation of the quality of the identified data. • Calculation of the indicators applying a bottom-up and a top-down approach. • The application showed that Umeå municipality performs well in certain areas. • The framework has strengths and limitations as a monitoring tool for urban areas. As cities worldwide implement strategies to accelerate the transition toward a circular economy (CE), there is an increasing need for tools to monitor progress. However, a standardised metric for CE monitoring in urban areas is lacking. This study examines the potential of the EU Circular Economy Monitoring Framework (CEMF), an established indicator-based framework for measuring national- and EU-level circularity performance, as a monitoring tool for urban areas. For this purpose, available data sources that can support the framework's application at the urban level are mapped, and data quality is assessed following the pedigree matrix approach. Next, the CEMF indicators are computed for the urban area of Umeå, Sweden. The mapping showed limited availability of urban-level data, necessitating the downscaling of national-level data using proxy factors. Most available urban-level data are of high quality, while the quality of national-level data is reduced when used to compute indicators at the urban level. The application of the CEMF in Umeå indicates that there are areas where the municipality performs well, though further improvements are needed. We conclude that the CEMF has potential as a monitoring tool for urban areas. However, improvements in CEMF's scope and data availability are recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

● The Circular Economy (CE) has been hailed as one of the solutions to resolve the climate crisis, and more cities are embarking on circular transitions ● However, CE will only be transformative if social impacts are considered ● Our review of academic and grey literature on social impacts and CE in cities shows a very limited consideration for social impacts, and where social impacts are covered, they focus on employment and governance ● More research is needed to understand how CE will impact on a wider range of social impact, including culture, health and fears and aspirations Worldwide, cities are implementing circular economy (CE) strategies to reduce the resources they consume and their environmental impact. However, the evidence of the intended and unintended social consequences of the transition to "circular cities" is scattered. The lack of a coherent overview of the evidence on the subject can hinder effective decision-making in policy and practice. This study examines the extent to which the current literature addresses the social impacts that a transition to a CE produces in cities. We used a methodological approach related to systematic mapping to collate the evidence published over the past decade globally. The study finds that social impacts have rarely been considered in studies of circular cities, and where they have been discussed, the scope has been quite limited, only covering employment (mostly of informal sector workers) and governance practices. This scoping review highlights the need to further analyse and integrate social impact considerations into decision-making connected to transitions towards circular cities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Assessment of indicator-based frameworks applicable to measure urban circularity. • Definition of criteria and validity requirements for assessing the frameworks. • The extent of compliance with the criteria differs among the frameworks. • None of the frameworks fulfills all the validity requirements. • Most frameworks consist mainly of indicators reflecting environmental aspects. The transition towards a circular economy (CE) is increasingly recognized as a promising pathway to tackle pressing sustainability challenges at the city-level. Indicator-based frameworks, that is, integrated systems of indicators, are considered as useful tools for monitoring this transition. Yet, studies that map and assess such frameworks are scanty. This article addresses this gap by assessing 15 indicator-based frameworks applicable to measure circularity at the city-level. The identified frameworks were assessed using eight criteria (transparency, stakeholder engagement, effective communication, ability to track temporal changes, applicability, alignment with CE principles, validity and relevance to sustainable development). Additionally, 12 validity requirements were defined to assess to what extent the indicators in the frameworks reflect CE aspects. The assessment reveals a wide variation regarding the extent to which the frameworks match the criteria with none of them satisfying all. In addition, in terms of validity criterion, none includes indicators that fulfill all the validity requirements. Furthermore, most frameworks consist mainly of environmental indicators and only three include indicators reflecting aspects related to the four pillars of sustainable development (environmental, social, economic and governance). Further research could develop a standardized framework for measuring circularity at the city-level and improving existing frameworks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]