Search

Background: The aim of our study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of the Fistula Laser Closure (FiLaC®) technique in patients at high risk of anal incontinence and to determine the predictors of success and the impact of the procedure on anal continence. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on all patients treated with FiLaC® in our department in May 2016–April 2017, because they were at high risk of anal incontinence after fistulotomy, The fistula was considered healed when the internal and external openings were closed and the patient experienced was no pain or leakage. Results: A total of 69 consecutive patients (34 males) with a median age of 40 years (33–53 years) were included in the study. One patient was lost to follow up. The fistulas were intersphincteric (3%), low (15%) or high (66%) trans-sphincteric, and suprasphincteric (16%). After a median follow-up period of 6.3 months (4.2–9.3), fistula healing was observed in 31 patients (45.6%). In univariate analysis, high trans-sphincteric fistulas (p = 0.007) and age over 50 years (p = 0.034) were significantly associated with healing. In multivariate analysis, only high trans-sphincteric fistulas were a predictive factor of significant success. No new cases of anal incontinence or any worsening in case of pre-existing anal incontinence were observed during follow-up. Conclusions: FiLaC® is particularly effective in cases of high trans-sphincteric fistulas (60% cure). This technique seems to be the most promising sphincter-saving technique available for this indication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dear Sir, Minimally invasive surgical techniques for haemorrhoidal disease are currently the subject of growing interest, because they are associated with less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and an earlier return to work than haemorrhoidectomy. Haemorrhoidal disease was classified as grade I in seven patients, grade II in seven patients, grade III in nine patients, and grade IV in one patient. Three patients had additional surgery during the LHP SP ® sp procedure: one patient had a skin tag excision and two patients had mucopexy. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Postoperative rectovaginal fistula leads to a loss of patients' quality of life and presents significant challenges to the surgeon. The literature focusing specifically on postoperative rectovaginal fistulas is limited. The objective of the present study is to identify factors that can enhance the success of the management of this postoperative rectovaginal fistula., Methods: This retrospective multicentric study included all patients undergoing surgery for rectovaginal fistulas, excluding those for whom the etiology of rectovaginal fistula was not postoperative. The major outcome measure was the success of the procedure., Results: A total of 82 patients with postsurgical fistulas were identified, of whom 70 were successfully treated, giving a success rate of 85.4%. On average, these patients required 3.04 ± 2.72 interventions. The creation of a diversion stoma did not increase the success rate of management [odds ratio (OR) = 0.488; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.107-2.220]. Among the 217 procedures performed, 69 were successful, accounting for a 31.8% success rate. The number of interventions and the creation of a diversion stoma did not correlate with the success of management. However, direct coloanal anastomosis was significantly associated with success (OR = 35.06; 95% CI 1.271-997.603; p = 0.036) as compared with endorectal advancement flap (ERAF). Other procedures such as Martius flap did not show a significantly higher success rate., Conclusion: The creation of a diversion stoma is not necessary in closing a fistula. ERAF should be considered as a first-line treatment prior to proposing more invasive approach such as direct coloanal anastomosis., (© 2024. The Author(s).)