1. Current Debates Regarding Optimal Patient Evaluation and Procedural Technique for Prostatic Artery Embolization
- Author
-
T. Powell, Shivank Bhatia, and Raj Ayyagari
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Clinical Decision-Making ,Prostatic Hyperplasia ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Radiography, Interventional ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms ,Lower urinary tract symptoms ,Prostate ,Risk Factors ,Artery embolization ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Embolization ,business.industry ,Patient Selection ,Recovery of Function ,medicine.disease ,Embolization, Therapeutic ,Prostatic artery embolization ,Urodynamics ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Treatment Outcome ,Quality of Life ,International Prostate Symptom Score ,Patient evaluation ,Radiology ,Prostate gland ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
There are active debates surrounding patient evaluation and procedural techniques of prostate artery embolization. This review evaluates the available evidence on the value of urodynamics, the effect of prostate gland size, the benefits of pre- and intraprocedural cross-sectional imaging, the utility of a balloon-occlusion microcatheter, the differences among embolic particle sizes and types, and the merits of radial versus femoral arterial access.
- Published
- 2020