Search

We examine the perturbation update step of the ensemble Kalman filters which rely on covariance localisation, and hence have the ability to assimilate non-local observations in geophysical models. We show that the updated perturbations of these ensemble filters are not to be identified with the main empirical orthogonal functions of the analysis covariance matrix, in contrast with the updated perturbations of the local ensemble transform Kalman filter (LETKF). Building on that evidence, we propose a new scheme to update the perturbations of a local ensemble square root Kalman filter (LEnSRF) with the goal to minimise the discrepancy between the analysis covariances and the sample covariances regularised by covariance localisation. The scheme has the potential to be more consistent and to generate updated members closer to the model's attractor (showing fewer imbalances). We show how to solve the corresponding optimisation problem and discuss its numerical complexity. The qualitative properties of the perturbations generated from this new scheme are illustrated using a simple one-dimensional covariance model. Moreover, we demonstrate on the discrete Lorenz–96 and continuous Kuramoto–Sivashinsky one-dimensional low-order models that the new scheme requires significantly less, and possibly none, multiplicative inflation needed to counteract imbalance, compared to the LETKF and the LEnSRF without the new scheme. Finally, we notice a gain in accuracy of the new LEnSRF as measured by the analysis and forecast root mean square errors, despite using well-tuned configurations where such gain is very difficult to obtain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The term 'asynchronous data assimilation' (ADA) refers to modifications of sequential data assimilation methods that take into consideration the observation time. In Sakov et al. [Tellus A, 62, 24-29 (2010)], a simple rule has been formulated for the ADA with the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF). To assimilate scattered in time observations, one needs to calculate ensemble forecast observations using the forecast ensemble at observation time. Using then these ensemble observations in the EnKF update matches the optimal analysis in the linear perfect model case. In this note, we generalise this rule for the case of additive model error. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For modelling geophysical systems, large-scale processes are described through a set of coarse-grained dynamical equations while small-scale processes are represented via parameterizations. This work proposes a method for identifying the best possible stochastic parameterization from noisy data. State-of-the-art sequential estimation methods such as Kalman and particle filters do not achieve this goal successfully because both suffer from the collapse of the posterior distribution of the parameters. To overcome this intrinsic limitation, we propose two statistical learning methods. They are based on the combination of the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) with either the expectation-maximization (EM) or the Newton-Raphson (NR) used to maximize a likelihood associated to the parameters to be estimated. The EM and NR are applied primarily in the statistics and machine learning communities and are brought here in the context of data assimilation for the geosciences. The methods are derived using a Bayesian approach for a hidden Markov model and they are applied to infer deterministic and stochastic physical parameters from noisy observations in coarse-grained dynamical models. Numerical experiments are conducted using the Lorenz-96 dynamical system with one and two scales as a proof of concept. The imperfect coarse-grained model is modelled through a one-scale Lorenz-96 system in which a stochastic parameterization is incorporated to represent the small-scale dynamics. The algorithms are able to identify the optimal stochastic parameterization with good accuracy under moderate observational noise. The proposed EnKF-EM and EnKF-NR are promising efficient statistical learning methods for developing stochastic parameterizations in high-dimensional geophysical models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]