Search

Stent thrombosis and restenosis remain drawbacks of drug-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance for stent deployment helps optimize its results in stable patients. The aim of this study was to examine the utility of routine IVUS guidance in patients with AMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Employing data from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR), we analyzed 14,329 patients with AMI from April 2006 through September 2010. Patients with cardiogenic shock and rescue PCI after thrombolysis were excluded. Clinical outcomes of 2,127 patients who underwent IVUS-guided PCI were compared to those of 8,235 patients who did not. Mean age was 63.6 ± 13.5 years and 72.3% were men. Patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI were younger, more often men, more hyperlipemic, and had increased body mass index and left ventricular ejection fraction. Number of treated vessels and stents used, stent length, and stent diameter were increased in the IVUS-guided group. Multivessel involvement was less frequent and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association type C lesion was more frequent in the IVUS-guided group. Drug-eluting stents were more frequently used compared to bare-metal stents in the IVUS group. There was no significant relation of stent thrombosis between the 2 groups. Twelve-month all-cause death was lower in the IVUS group. After multivariate analysis and propensity score adjustment, IVUS guidance was not an independent predictor for 12-month all-cause death (hazard ratio 0.212, 0.026 to 1.73, p = 0.148). In conclusion, this study does not support routine use of IVUS guidance for stent deployment in patients who present with AMI and undergo PCI.

Complete blood count is the most widely available laboratory datum in the early in-hospital period after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We assessed the clinical utility of the combined use of hemoglobin (Hb) level and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (N/L) for early risk stratification in patients with STEMI. We analyzed 801 consecutive patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 12 hours of onset of symptoms. Patients with cardiogenic shock or underlying malignancy were excluded, and 739 patients (63 ± 13 years, 74% men) were included in the final analysis. Patients were categorized into 3 groups using the median value of N/L (3.86) and the presence of anemia (Hb

The relation between low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been described. A total of 9,571 eligible patients (mean age 62.6 ± 12.5 years, 6,967 men) who underwent PCI with a final diagnosis of AMI from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) were divided into 5 groups according to LDL cholesterol level:70, 70 to 99, 100 to 129, 130 to 159, and ≥ 160 mg/dl. Clinical outcomes in hospital and 1 and 12 months after PCI in patients with AMI were examined. Age and co-morbidities decreased as LDL cholesterol increased. Patients with higher LDL cholesterol levels had favorable hemodynamic status and laboratory findings. Lifesaving medications, including lipid-lowering drugs, were underused in patients with lower LDL cholesterol levels. Clinical outcomes in hospital and 1 and 12 months after PCI showed better results as LDL cholesterol increased, except for patients with LDL cholesterol levels ≥ 160 mg/dl. In a Cox proportional-hazards model, LDL cholesterol level was not an independent predictor of mortality at 12 months, after adjusting for clinical characteristics including demographics and biologic data. In conclusion, the cholesterol paradox in patients with AMI is related to confounding by baseline characteristics associated with survival. More intensive treatment including lipid-lowering therapy for AMI in patients with lower LDL cholesterol level may result in better clinical outcomes.