1. Predictors and In-Hospital Outcomes Among Patients Using a Single Versus Bilateral Mammary Arteries in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
- Author
-
Sohail Sareh, Esteban Aguayo, Joseph Hadaya, Yas Sanaiha, Richard J. Shemin, Vishal Dobaria, Bassam Omari, and Peyman Benharash
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Bypass grafting ,Hospitals, Rural ,Coronary Artery Disease ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Age Distribution ,Hospitals, Urban ,Postoperative Complications ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Surgical Wound Infection ,cardiovascular diseases ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Hospital Mortality ,Coronary Artery Bypass ,Hospital Costs ,Mammary Arteries ,Sex Distribution ,Hospitals, Teaching ,Aged ,business.industry ,Hospital level ,Length of Stay ,Middle Aged ,Respiration, Artificial ,United States ,Stroke ,Mediastinitis ,surgical procedures, operative ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Hospital outcomes ,Sternal infection ,Cardiology ,Mammary artery ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Resource utilization ,Artery - Abstract
The benefit of bilateral mammary artery (BIMA) use during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) continues to be debated. This study examined nationwide trends in BIMA use and factors influencing its utilization. Using the National Inpatient Sample, adults undergoing isolated multivessel CABG between 2005 and 2015 were identified and stratified based on the use of a single mammary artery or BIMA. Regression models were fit to identify patient and hospital level predictors of BIMA use and characterize the association of BIMA on outcomes including sternal infection, mortality, and resource utilization. An estimated 4.5% (n = 60,698) of patients underwent CABG with BIMA, with a steady increase from 3.8% to 5.0% over time (p0.001). Younger age, male gender, and elective admission, were significant predictors of BIMA use. Moreover, private insurance was associated with higher odds of BIMA use (adjusted odds ratio 1.24) compared with Medicare. BIMA use was not a predictor of postoperative sternal infection, in-hospital mortality, or hospitalization costs. Overall, BIMA use remains uncommon in the United States despite no significant differences in acute postoperative outcomes. Several patient, hospital, and socioeconomic factors appear to be associated with BIMA utilization.
- Published
- 2020