Search

Despite living closer to high-performing centers, minority patients reportedly receive care at lower-quality hospitals. Investigating opportunities for improvement at minority-serving hospitals may help attenuate disparities in care among cardiothoracic surgery patients. We sought to investigate the relationship between hospital quality and failure to rescue (FTR).Over 451,000 cardiac surgery patients from 2000 to 2011 at minority-serving hospitals (MSHs) were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. After stratifying patients by hospital mortality quartile, outcomes at poorly performing MSHs were compared with those at high-performing MSHs. Propensity score matching was used for comparisons.Though patients at poorly performing centers were more likely Black, there were no significant differences in admission status (urgent vs elective), income, insurance, or risk before matching. There were no differences in comorbidities between low-performing and high-performing MSHs including chronic lung disease, coagulopathy, hypertension, and renal failure. While complications remained similar across mortality quartiles (29%, 32%, 31%, and 36%, respectively; P.0001), FTR increased in a stepwise manner (5.4%, 8.7%, 11.2%, and 15.5%, respectively; P.0001). The same was true after propensity score matching-FTR nearly tripled in the highest-mortality centers (14.4% vs 5.3%; P.0001), while complications only increased 1.2-fold from 31.1% to 36.7% (P = .0058). This finding persisted even when stratified by procedure type and by complication.Improving timely management of complications after cardiac surgery may serve as a promising opportunity for increasing quality of care at MSHs. When considering centralization of care in cardiac surgery, equal emphasis should be placed on collaboration between tertiary care centers and low-quality MSHs to mitigate disparities in care.

Failure to rescue (FTR) is gaining popularity as a quality metric. The relationship between patient frailty and FTR after cardiovascular surgery has not been fully explored. This study aimed to utilize a national database to examine the impact of patient frailty on FTR.Of 5,199,534 patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery between 2000 and 2014, 75,851 (1.5%) were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database as frail based on the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty-defining diagnoses indicator. Propensity-score matching was used to adjust for patient- and hospital-level characteristics and comorbidities when comparing frail and nonfrail patients.Frail patients were on average older (68 ± 12 years vs 65 ± 12 years; P.001) and had more comorbidities including heart failure, and chronic lung, liver, or renal disease. Among 68,472 matched pairs, frail patients had significantly higher rates of FTR (13.4% vs 11.9%; P .001). This contributed to a $39,796 increase in cost per hospitalization (P.001). Renal failure, respiratory failure, pneumonia, and sepsis were most commonly associated with FTR in frail patients. When hospitals were stratified by risk-adjusted mortality, low-mortality (1st quintile) centers had significantly lower FTR rates and costs among frail patients when compared to high-mortality (5th quintile) centers.Frailty contributes significantly to FTR after cardiovascular surgery. Frail patients can expect better outcomes with lower costs at cardiac surgical centers of excellence that can adequately manage postoperative outcomes. Preoperative assessment of frailty may better guide risk estimation and identification of patients who would benefit from appropriate prehabilitative interventions to optimize outcomes.

Background Despite advances in surgical technique and perioperative management, pneumonectomy remains associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of annual institutional volume of anatomic lung resections on outcomes after elective pneumonectomy. Methods We evaluated all patients who underwent elective pneumonectomy from 2005 to 2014 in the National Inpatient Sample. Patients less than 18 years of age, or with trauma-related diagnoses, mesothelioma, or a nonelective admission were excluded. Hospitals were divided into volume quartiles based on annual institutional anatomic lung resection caseload. We studied the effect of institutional volume on inhospital mortality, complications, and failure to rescue, as well as costs and length of stay. Results During the study period, an estimated 22,739 patients underwent pneumonectomy, with a reduction in national mortality from 7.9% to 5.5% (P trend = .045). Compared with the highest volume centers, operations performed at the lowest volume hospitals were associated with 1.74 increased odds of mortality (95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 2.66). Despite similar odds of postoperative complications, low volume hospital status was associated with increased failure to rescue rates (18.3% vs 12.7%, P = .024) and adjusted odds of mortality (1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 2.64) after any complication. Conclusions High volume hospital status is strongly associated with reduced mortality and failure to rescue rates after pneumonectomy. Efforts to centralize care or disseminate best practices may lead to improved national outcomes for this high-risk procedure.

Background Cardiac surgeons have a significant history of participating in humanitarian work; however, the outcomes in this arena are not well delineated. We sought to define and describe failure to rescue (FTR) in this setting by analyzing the outcomes of the International Children’s Heart Foundation. Methods From 2008 to 2017, 3009 patients underwent operations during the course of an International Children’s Heart Foundation mission. Of these, 1165 patients had at least one complication. These patients were divided into those who ultimately died (FTR group, n = 107) and those who survived (survivor group, n = 1058). Clinical presentation and outcomes were compared. Results The overall FTR rate was 10%. Patients in the FTR group were significantly younger, weighed less, and were shorter. Children who required a preoperative admission to the intensive care unit were more likely to be in the FTR group. Intraoperative data demonstrated significantly longer cardiopulmonary bypass time among FTR patients, with similar use of intraoperative blood product. Postoperatively, patients in the FTR group had more reintubations than survivors. Cardiopulmonary bypass and intensive care unit times were shown to be significant predictors of FTR. There was a trend between program volume and FTR rate. Program volume appeared to be correlated with FTR. Conclusions Failure to rescue occurs at a rate of 10% in the humanitarian congenital cardiac surgery setting. The FTR patients were younger, required more intubations, and had significantly more diagnoses of transposition of the great arteries. Longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and intensive care unit admission were associated with increased risk of FTR.

Data on failure to rescue (FTR) after esophagectomy are sparse. We sought to better understand the patient factors associated with FTR and to assess whether FTR is associated with hospital volume.We identified all patients undergoing esophagectomy between 2010 and 2014 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Nationwide Readmission Database. We defined FTR as mortality after a major complication. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify patient factors and hospital-volume associations with FTR.Of 26,820 patients undergoing an esophagectomy, 7130 (26.6%) experienced a major complication. Of those, 1321 did not survive the index hospitalization (FTR rate, 18.5%). Risk factors for FTR included increasing age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.06; P.001), congestive heart failure (aOR, 2.07; P.001), bleeding disorders (aOR, 2.9; P.001), liver disease (aOR, 2.37; P = .001), and renal failure (aOR, 2.37; P = .002). At the hospital level there was wide variation in FTR rates across hospital volume quintiles, with 21.2% of patients suffering a complication not surviving to discharge at low-volume hospitals compared with 13.4% at high-volume hospitals (P.001). At low-volume hospitals the highest FTR rates were acute renal failure (35.3%), postoperative hemorrhage (31.9%), and pulmonary failure (28.1%).One in 5 esophagectomy patients suffering a complication at low-volume hospitals do not survive to discharge. Several patient factors are associated with death after a major complication. Strategies to improve the recognition and management of complications in at-risk patients may be essential to improve outcomes at low-volume hospitals.

Background The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) quality benchmarks guide clinical outcome improvement in cardiac surgery. Failure to rescue (FTR) from postoperative morbidity is a proposed metric of program quality. We examined the effect of a quality improvement initiative guided by STS quality measures on outcomes and FTR. Methods Prospectively collected STS data on 3,065 consecutive patients who underwent nonemergency cardiac operations at a single institution from January 1, 2010, to January 31, 2014, were retrospectively analyzed. On January 1, 2012, the quality improvement initiative was implemented. Clinical outcomes and FTR rates were compared between operations performed before (group A) and after (group B) implementation. Results STS predicted preoperative mortality and composite of mortality plus morbidity were similar in group A and group B (2.9% ± 3.7% vs 3.1% ± 4.0%, p = 0.21; 17.8% ± 12.1% vs 18.3% ± 12.4%, p = 0.24, respectively). However, the observed mortality and composite mortality plus morbidity were lower in group B vs group A (31 of 1,576 [2.0%] vs 46 of 1,489 [3.1%], p = 0.05; 168 of 1,576 [10.7%] vs 301 of 1,489 [20.2%], p = 0.0001, respectively). Despite clinical outcome improvement, no differences in FTR rates were observed across all seven major morbidity indicators in group A vs B (35 of 290 [12.1%] vs 19 of 156 [12.1%], p = 1.00, respectively). The finding of similarity in the FTR rate remained consistent during procedural subgroup analysis for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in group A vs B (22 of 174 [12.6%] vs 9 of 77 [11.7%], p = 1.00, respectively). Conclusions Implementation of quality improvement initiatives significantly improves outcomes without affecting FTR rates. Further study is needed to determine if FTR provides additive value to quality assessment over existing STS metrics.