Search

Coronary endarterectomy (CE) is an uncommon and often unplanned technique used to approach difficult targets during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We evaluated the outcomes of CABG with CE (CE-CABG) using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.All isolated, first-time, elective or urgent CABG cases from July 2011 to September 2019 in the Adult Cardiac Surgery Database were retrospectively reviewed. Because of a higher risk profile in the patients undergoing CE-CABG, we performed propensity score matching. Primary outcomes included operative mortality and postoperative myocardial infarction. For patients ≥65 years, long-term mortality and rehospitalization were evaluated using linked data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.Of the total 1 111 792 patients included, 32 164 (2.9%) had CE-CABG and 1 079 628 (97.1%) underwent CABG alone. The majority of CE-CABG involved a single-vessel endarterectomy (86.9%; n = 27 945); the left anterior descending was most common (40.9%; n = 13 161). Compared with propensity score-matched CABG, CE-CABG had increased operative mortality (3.2% vs 1.7%; P.0001; odds ratio, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.63-2.01) and postoperative myocardial infarction (6.8% vs 3.9%; P.0001; odds ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.68-1.93). CE-CABG had higher risk of mortality in the first year and rehospitalization for myocardial infarction in the first 3 years but was comparable to CABG alone thereafter. Subgroup analysis showed no difference between CE-CABG of the left anterior descending compared with CE-CABG of other coronary arteries.This analysis demonstrates that CE-CABG has acceptable long-term outcomes and serves as a benchmark for what can be expected when this rare procedure is used.

Background Although recruiting highly qualified, diverse applicants into cardiothoracic surgery remains a national priority, their characteristics remain unknown. This study aims to describe current and future applicants in cardiothoracic surgery. Methods Aspiring cardiothoracic surgeons (students interested in matriculating in a North American training program) were voluntarily enrolled in the study through Twitter and email outreach. A 33-question survey evaluated their backgrounds, research experiences, attitudes, and interests within cardiothoracic surgery. Standard descriptive statistics were used. Results There were 111 participants, 40 of whom were female (36.0%) and 27 of whom identified as an underrepresented minority (24.3%). Of the total, 63 belonged to an institution with a cardiothoracic surgery training program (56.8%). A total of 91 students envisioned having a mostly operative career (82.0%) and 75 envisioned pursuing educational roles (67.6%). The most popular surgical specialties were heart transplantation (50.5%) and aortic surgery (47.8%). Participants selected having a high-intensity operative environment (81.2%) and an innovative academic environment (58.8%) as the most attractive qualities. Perceived lack of work–life balance (46%) and toxic training or work environment (28%) were the greatest deterrents. Finances during the application process were perceived as a potential barrier by 41 students (36.9%). Approximately 75% of students (83 of 111) had faculty as mentors; 46.8% (56 of 111) thought that cardiothoracic surgery faculty were approachable but had limited time for mentorship. Conclusions This survey study characterized a nationally selected pool of aspiring cardiothoracic surgeons using social media. Future studies involving larger and more diverse cohorts are warranted to find areas for improvement in recruitment, retention, and diversity.

In October 2018, the United States implemented a change in the donor heart allocation policy from a three-tiered to a six-tiered status system. The purpose of the current study was to examine changes in waitlist patterns among patients listed for concomitant heart-liver transplantation with implementation of the new allocation system.Patients listed for heart-liver transplantation between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2021, were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Patients were grouped by era according to initial list date before or after October 18, 2018. Competing risks regression for mortality, transplantation, removal from waitlist due to illness was performed according to the method of Fine and Gray. Waitlist data were censored at 3 years from initial listing.Overall, 523 patients were identified, of whom 310 were listed before (era 1, 59%) and 213 after (era 2, 41%) allocation change. Patients in era 1 were older, had more restrictive cardiomyopathy, and more preoperative inotrope use (all P.05). However, patients in era 2 has longer ischemic times (3.5 ± 1.1 vs 3.1 ± 1.1 hours, P.01) and more intraaortic balloon pump use (8.9% vs 3.9%, P = .016). Era 2 was associated with lower subdistribution hazard for death (hazard ratio 0.37; 95% CI, 0.13-1.02; P = .054) and increased transplantation (hazard ratio 1.35; 95% CI, 1.06-1.72; P = .015).The implementation of the US donor heart allocation policy was associated with more preoperative intraaortic balloon pump use for patients listed for heart-liver transplantation. Despite that, the modern era was associated with lower waitlist mortality and more frequent transplantation, without increased risk of delisting due to illness.

The University of Pennsylvania classification system (Penn class) of acute type A aortic dissection (aTAAD) is used to evaluate the impact of malperfusion on surgical outcomes. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the validity of Penn class in a larger and more contemporary cohort and to compare its performance with other classification systems.This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent aTAAD repair at our institution from 1993 to 2020. Patients were assigned to Penn class on the basis of burden of preoperative malperfusion syndrome. The association of Penn class and 30-day mortality was evaluated by multivariable regression. The discriminatory ability of Penn class for mortality was determined by a bootstrapped C statistic.There were 1192 patients, of whom 50% were assigned to Penn class A (no ischemia), 21% (253/1192) to class B (local ischemia), 14% (171/1192) to class C (generalized ischemia), and 14% (167/1192) to class B-C (combined ischemia). The incidence of mortality rose significantly with increasing Penn class from 5% (31/601) in class A to 35% (59/167) in class B-C (P.001). After adjustment, 30-day mortality increased significantly with class B (odds ratio [OR], 2.43; 95% CI, 1.38-4.27), class C (OR, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.90-6.03), and class B-C (OR, 13.08; 95% CI, 7.90-22.15) compared with class A. The C statistic was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.72-0.80) and was significantly higher than for models featuring alternative classification systems (P.05).Penn class provides excellent discrimination for 30-day mortality after repair of aTAAD.

Frailty is increasingly recognized as an important prognostic marker in surgical populations. The effects of frailty on outcomes after mitral valve replacement (MVR) is less clear given the inherent complexity of this patient population. We evaluated the influences of frailty on outcomes and readmission rates after MVR.Adult patients undergoing isolated MVR were queried from the National Readmissions Database from 2010 to 2014. Frailty was defined using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty-defining diagnoses indicator, a validated instrument developed for use in health administrative data. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine hospital- and patient-level risk factors for readmission, postoperative complications, and death.Among 50,410 patients who underwent MVR, 7.9% met frailty criteria. Frail patients were more likely to be older, have nonprivate insurance, an index admission from the emergency department, and teaching hospital care (all P.001). Frail patients had significantly more postoperative complications (77% vs 47%, P.001), more discharges to a facility (50% vs 21%, P.001), and higher in-hospital mortality (12% vs 4%, P.001). Index hospitalization costs were almost doubled in frail patients, and of those who survived to discharge, 30-day readmissions were more frequent (28% vs 20%, P.001). Frailty independently increased the risk of index hospitalization composite complications (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.61-4.12), in-hospital mortality (AOR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.90-2.92), and 30-day readmission (AOR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.20-1.78).Frailty is an independent predictor of morbidity, death, and increased costs after MVR. Frailty metrics should be increasingly understood among patients requiring mitral valve intervention as percutaneous approaches for intervention become increasingly used.

In 2018, a United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policy change increased prioritization of patients bridged with temporary mechanical circulatory support devices, such as venoarterial ECMO, for cardiac transplantation. Considering increased waitlist acuity, we sought to characterize whether this was associated with an increased risk for development of postoperative acute renal failure requiring dialysis (AKI-D) and risk of death after transplantation.Dialysis-naive adults receiving single-organ heart transplant between November 2009 and February 2020 were stratified by receipt of AKI-D. Era 1 and era 2 were defined by the periods of UNOS allocation before and after policy change, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors for AKI-D. Rates of AKI-D were compared by propensity score-matched cohorts. Survival was compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis.A total of 20 698 patients were included. Venoarterial ECMO use significantly increased in era 2 (5.6% vs 0.58%; P.01). Overall prevalence of AKI-D was greater in era 2 (13.5% vs 10.2%; P.01). Use of preoperative ECMO, intra-aortic balloon pump, and ventilators and longer ischemia times were identified as independent risk factors for development of AKI-D. Five- and 10-year survival rates were significantly decreased for patients with AKI-D. There was no short-term survival difference of patients with AKI-D between era 2 and the more contemporary era 1.Patients in whom AKI-D develops after transplantation have significantly worse short- and long-term outcomes. Preoperative use of ECMO, preoperative ventilator support, and longer ischemia times are risk factors for development of AKI-D, and their prevalence has increased since the allocation policy change.

Postsurgical readmissions are an increasingly scrutinized marker of health care quality. We sought to estimate the risk factors and costs associated with readmissions after mitral valve (MV) surgery in a large, nationally representative cohort.Adult patients undergoing MV repair or replacement were queried from the National Readmissions Database from 2010 to 2014. Data were collected on the prevalence and indications for readmission within 30 days as well as the hospital-, procedure, and patient-level risk factors as determined by multivariable logistic regression.Among 76,342 patients undergoing MV surgery, the rate of 30-day readmission was 17.0%. Those undergoing replacement procedures had significantly higher readmission rates (20.7% vs 13.1%; P.001) compared with repair. Significant independent predictors of readmission after both MV repair and replacement included length of stay ≥8 days, chronic lung disease, chronic renal disease, and low hospital procedural volume for MV surgery. Readmissions to nonindex hospitals accounted for 26.6% of all readmissions. The most common indications for readmission were heart failure (21.4%), arrhythmia (17.0%) and respiratory diagnoses (15.0%), and infections (10.2%). The mean cost per readmission was $15,397, and among readmitted patients, the cost of readmission accounted for 17.8% of the total cost of the episode of care.Nearly 1 in 5 patients undergoing MV surgery are readmitted within 30 days. Treatment at a low-volume center was strongly associated with readmission, and much of the readmission burden falls on nonindex hospitals. Further characterization of readmissions may improve the quality of care associated with MV surgery.

Background Stroke is a serious complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), yet predictive models are not available. A new risk model for in-hospital stroke after TAVR was developed and used to estimate site-specific performance. Methods We included 97,600 TAVR procedures from 521 sites in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry from July 2014 to June 2017. Association between baseline covariates and in-hospital stroke was estimated by logistic regression. Discrimination was evaluated by C-statistic. Calibration was tested internally via cross-validation. Hierarchical modeling was used to estimate risk-adjusted site-specific performance. Results Median age was 82 years, 44,926 (46.0%) were women, and 1,839 (1.9%) had in-hospital stroke. Covariates associated with stroke (odds ratio) included transapical access (1.44), access excluding transapical and transfemoral (1.77), prior stroke (1.57), prior transient ischemic attack (1.50), preprocedural shock, inotropes or mechanical assist device (1.48), smoking (1.28), porcelain aorta (1.23), peripheral arterial disease (1.21), age per 5 years (1.11), glomerular filtration rate per 5 mL/min (0.97), body surface area per m2 (0.55 male; 0.43 female), and prior aortic valve (0.78) and nonaortic valvular (0.42) procedures. The C-statistic was 0.622. Calibration curves demonstrated agreement between observed and expected stroke rates. Hierarchical modeling showed 10 (1.9%) centers with significantly higher odds ratios for in-hospital stroke than their peers. Conclusions A risk model for in-hospital stroke after TAVR was developed from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry and used to estimate site-specific stroke performance. This model can serve as a valuable resource for quality improvement, clinical decision making, and patient counseling.

Background The effect of frailty on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of four commonly used frailty markers as predictors of early and late outcomes among patients undergoing TAVR. Methods A review was performed of 361 high- and extreme-risk patients undergoing TAVR from 2011 to 2015. Four frailty variables were assessed: serum albumin (g/dL), 5-m walk (seconds), grip strength (kg), and Katz index of independence in activities of daily living. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between the frailty indicators and 30-day composite of mortality, stroke, new heart block requiring permanent pacemaker, major or life-threatening bleeding, acute renal failure, major vascular complication, and 30-day readmission rate. Minimum distance to the perfect point (0, 1) was performed to delineate a cutoff point for each frailty indicator, and risk models were compared using receiver-operating characteristics curves. Results The composite of outcomes occurred in 28% of patients. Serum albumin, activities of daily living, and 5-m walk were independent predictors for 30-day composite outcomes, but only albumin was predictive of 30-day mortality. A new frailty model (four frailty indicators, age, and sex) to predict 30-day mortality was created and compared with The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality. Better discrimination was found with the new frailty model (area under the curve 0.74 versus 0.58). New individual frailty variable cutoff values were found to predict our composite of events. Conclusions Among high- and extreme-risk patients undergoing TAVR, our new frailty model was more discriminative of 30-day mortality than The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality. New cutoff values for frailty indicators were identified and will require further validation.

Postsurgical readmissions are an increasingly scrutinized marker of health care quality. We sought to estimate the rate, risk factors, causes, and costs associated with readmissions after esophagectomy in a large, nationally representative cohort.We studied patients from the Nationwide Readmissions Database undergoing esophagectomy from 2010 to 2014. Data were collected on the prevalence and indications for readmission within 30 days as well as the hospital-, procedure-, and patient-level risk factors as determined by multivariable logistic regression.Among 13,282 cases, the rate of 30-day readmission was 19.4%, with the most common indications for readmission being pulmonary (20.6%) and gastrointestinal complications (20%). Median cost of readmission was $9660 (interquartile range, $5392 to $20,447), and pulmonary complications accounted for the greatest total cost burden at 25.8% of all readmission-related costs. Independent risk factors for readmission on multivariable analysis included perioperative blood transfusion (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 1.65; P = .008), discharge to a nursing facility (AOR 1.83; 95% CI, 1.41 to 2.39; P.001), high illness severity based on All Patients Refined Diagnosis-Related Groups scoring (AOR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.84; P.001), chronic renal failure (AOR 1.61; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.29; P = .009), and comorbid drug abuse (AOR 2.19; 95% CI, 1.08 to 4.41; P = .029).Nearly 1 in 5 patients undergoing esophagectomy are readmitted within 30 days of discharge, at a median cost of $9660 per readmission. Pulmonary complications account for the greatest number of readmissions and the greatest total cost burden. Targeting the causes of readmission, especially pulmonary causes, may help significantly reduce the total morbidity and health care costs associated with esophagectomy.

Due to perceived technical challenges, patients with previous surgical mitral valve repair or replacement (SMVR) have been excluded from most transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) trials. Our objective was to compare the 30-day and 1-year outcomes of TAVR for patients with and without prior SMVR.In a retrospective review of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and American College of Cardiology (ACC) Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT) Registry, we compared 1097 patients with prior SMVR to 46,327 patients without prior SMVR who underwent TAVR between November 2011 and September 2015 at 394 US centers. Preoperative characteristics, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.Patients with previous SMVR were younger, more often female, and had higher STS predicted risk of mortality (8.6% vs 6.8%, P.001). However, there was no difference in 30-day mortality (4.6% vs 5.5%, P = .293), myocardial infarction, stroke, reintervention, new dialysis, or readmission. Moderate/severe paravalvular leak at discharge was also similar (5.8% vs 4.9%, P = .343). At 1 year, morbidity was similar with slightly higher mortality among patients with prior SMVR (20% vs 17.5%, P = .087) that was significant after adjustment (hazard ratio 1.18, P = .043). The type of prior SMVR (repair, bioprosthetic replacement, or mechanical replacement) had no impact on 30-day or 1-year survival.Patients with prior SMVR undergoing TAVR had similar 30-day outcomes, slightly higher 1-year mortality, and no increase in early paravalvular leak compared with patients who did not have previous SMVR. Prior SMVR should not preclude TAVR for appropriately selected patients.

Containing more than 6 million cumulative operative records and accounting for 90% to 95% of adult cardiac surgery performed in the United States, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database is an invaluable resource for performance assessment, quality improvement, and clinical research. This article reviews the seven major research efforts published in 2016 that utilized the Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Two studies evaluated national trends in clinical practice, three assessed the effect of several risk factors on postoperative morbidity and mortality, and two developed new models to evaluate quality of care. The findings of these studies have enhanced clinical practice and delineated areas for future quality improvement research.