Search

Patients may experience improved quality of life (QoL) without complete clearance of skin disease. The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CDASI-A) score correlates with the Symptoms and Emotions subscales of Skindex-29, a measure of QoL, down to CDASI-A scores of 7 points (for Symptoms) and 10 points (for Emotions).Our goal was to define an important change in disease activity, as measured by the CDASI-A, that results in a meaningful change in QoL in patients with dermatomyositis.In 103 patients, we assessed the percentage change and actual change in CDASI-A scores needed to achieve a meaningful improvement in QoL, using linear regression models.We found that meaningful improvement correlates with 7·86 points (P0·001) in Symptoms, and 10·29 points (P0·001) in Emotions, after correlating Skindex-29 to an established definition of meaningful change in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). For patients with initial CDASI-A scores14 points, a 40% change in CDASI-A between the first two visits suggests a meaningful change in Skindex-29. In patients with moderate initial CDASI-A (15-26 points), the changes in CDASI-A resulting in meaningful changes in Symptoms and Emotions were 6 points (P 0·001) and 7 points (P0·001), respectively. For initial CDASI-A scores in the severe range (27-35 points), an improvement in CDASI-A by 11 points (P = 0·030) and 9 points (P = 0·021) leads to a meaningful change in Symptoms and Emotions, respectively.In patients with an initial CDASI-A score14 points, a 40% change in the CDASI-A score can be used to indicate a meaningful change in QoL in future dermatomyositis trials. What's already known about this topic? The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) is a validated disease assessment tool used to capture the extent of cutaneous activity and damage. The Skindex-29 and Dermatology Life Quality Index are standardized and validated measures of quality of life (QoL) for clinical trials and correlate with CDASI Activity (CDASI-A) scores. What does this study add? We identified what change in Skindex-29 scores over two consecutive visits would indicate an important change (a minimal clinically important difference) in QoL. We determined which change in CDASI-A scores over two consecutive visits would lead to a meaningful change in QoL. For patients with an initial CDASI-A score14 points, a 40% change in the CDASI-A score over two visits is associated with a meaningful change in QoL. What are the clinical implications of this work? Clinical trials can consider using a 40% change in the CDASI-A score as an end point when assessing the clinical efficacy of drugs.

Background Diagnostic criteria are used to identify a patient having a disease in a clinical setting, whereas classification criteria create a well-defined population for research purposes. The diagnosis and classification of amyopathic dermatomyositis (ADM) have not been recognized by most existing criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). To address this, several criteria were proposed to define ADM either as a distinct disease entity or as a subset of the spectrum of IIMs. Objectives To discuss the diagnosis and classification of ADM and to assesses the available criteria in identifying cases of ADM and/or distinguishing it from dermatological mimickers such as lupus erythematosus. Methods We conducted an extensive literature search using the PubMed database from June 2016 to August 2018, using the search terms 'amyopathic dermatomyositis', 'diagnosis' and 'classification'. Results The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, which are the only validated classification criteria for adult and juvenile IIM and their major subgroups, include three cutaneous items (Gottron sign, Gottron papules, heliotrope rash) to be able to classify ADM. This international and multispecialty effort is a huge step forward in the classification of skin-predominant disease in dermatomyositis. However, about 25% of the population with ADM do not meet two out of the three skin features and are misdiagnosed or classified as having a different disease entity, most commonly lupus erythematosus. Conclusions These gaps rationalize the continuous assessment and improvement of existing criteria and/or the development of validated, separate and skin-focused criteria for DM.

Fatigue is a well-established symptom in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but has not been well characterized in other skin-limited autoimmune diseases such as cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), amyopathic dermatomyositis (ADM) or autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBD).In this retrospective study, we compared fatigue in controls (n = 84) with that in patients enrolled in prospective longitudinal databases with SLE (n = 165), CLE (n = 226), ADM (n = 136) and AIBD (n = 79).We used the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) vitality scale to analyse median scores and the percentages of patients with clinically significant fatigue (defined as a score ≤ 35) between experimental groups and controls.Median and interquartile range (IQR) vitality scores demonstrated greater fatigue in the experimental groups (SLE 35, IQR 20-55; CLE 50, IQR 30-70; ADM 50, IQR 30-65; AIBD 55, IQR 35-70) than in controls (73, IQR 65-85) (P0·05 for each experimental group vs. control). The SLE group had worse fatigue than all of the other groups (P0·05 SLE vs. each group), but there was no difference between the CLE, ADM or AIBD groups (all P0·05). In addition, the experimental groups had more clinically significant fatigue (score ≤ 35) (SLE 44·2%, CLE 25·2%, ADM 31·6%, AIBD 24·1%) than controls (2%) (P0·01 for each experimental group vs. control). The SLE group had more clinically significant fatigue than the CLE group (P0·01); however, there was no difference in clinically significant fatigue between SLE and either ADM (P = 0·17) or AIBD (P = 0·055).These findings demonstrate that patients with skin-limited autoimmune disease experience more fatigue than controls. Fatigue is an important symptom that negatively affects quality of life for patients. It should be addressed by clinicians and measured in future clinical trials.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) assessment is more difficult in patients with skin of colour (SOC).To compare the reliability of commonly used outcome measures for assessing AD in patients with SOC and to evaluate a novel greyscale in this population.Twenty-five patients with AD each attended a 1-day scoring exercise based in either Sydney or Melbourne, Australia. Each patient was scored by the same five physicians using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (oSCORAD), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) and a novel greyscale. Patients also completed the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure and quality-of-life measures. A Mexameter was used to measure baseline melanin indices. Ten random patients were rescored to test intrarater reliability.We included 11 light-skinned patients (melanin index ≤ 200) and 14 patients with SOC (melanin index200) in the cohort. The inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were EASI 0·83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·66-0·94] for light skin and 0·77 (95% CI 0·60-0·91) for SOC; oSCORAD 0·68 (95% CI 0·44-0·88) for light skin and 0·74 (95% CI 0·54-0·89) for SOC; and IGA 0·80 (95% CI 0·62-0·93) for light skin and 0·70 (95% CI 0·49-0·87) for SOC. The greyscale had an ICC of 0·78 (95% CI 0·60-0·91) when replacing the EASI's erythema scale for patients with SOC. All scores showed excellent intrarater reliability for all skin types. Erythema component analysis showed that erythema did not contribute to variability.EASI showed excellent reliability for patients of all skin colours, and is recommended as the optimal core measure for patients with all skin colours.

SummaryBackground The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) and Cutaneous Assessment Tool–Binary Method (CAT-BM) have been shown to be reliable and valid outcome measures to assess cutaneous disease in adult dermatomyositis (DM) and juvenile DM (JDM), respectively. Objectives This study compared the CDASI and CAT-BM for use by paediatric dermatologists, paediatric rheumatologists and paediatric neurologists in patients with JDM. Methods Five paediatric dermatologists, five paediatric rheumatologists and five paediatric neurologists each evaluated 14 patients with JDM using the CDASI, CAT-BM, and skin Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scales. Inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability, construct validity and completion time were compared. Results Inter-rater reliability for CDASI activity and damage scores was good to moderate for paediatric dermatologists and rheumatologists, but poor for paediatric neurologists. The inter-rater reliability for CAT-BM activity scores was moderate for paediatric dermatologists and rheumatologists, but poor for paediatric neurologists and poor across all specialties for damage scores. Intra-rater reliability for the CDASI and CAT-BM activity and damage scores was moderate to excellent for paediatric dermatologists, rheumatologists and neurologists. Strong associations were found between skin PGA activity and damage scores and CDASI or CAT-BM activity and damage scores, respectively (P < 0·002). The CDASI had a mean completion time of 5·4 min compared with that for the CAT-BM of 3·1 min. Conclusions Our data confirm the reliability of the CDASI activity and damage scores and the CAT-BM activity scores when used by paediatric dermatologists and rheumatologists in assessing JDM. Significant variation existed in the paediatric neurologists’ scores.

Pulmonary complications are common in dermatomyositis (DM) and contribute to significant morbidity and mortality1-3. Patients with dermatomyositis and anti-synthethase4, anti-PM/Scl5 or anti-MDA56 antibodies have specific signs (mechanic's hands in anti-synthethase phenotype; skin and oral ulcers, arthritis and arthralgia, and alopecia in anti-MDA5 phenotype and sclerodermatous changes in anti-PM/Scl phenotype) and an increased risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a blistering disease and tumour necrosis factor-α has a role in its pathogenesis.To evaluate the safety of infliximab (IFX) with prednisone compared with prednisone alone in the treatment of PV. In addition, treatment response was assessed and mechanistic studies were performed.Subjects with PV who had ongoing disease activity while being maintained on prednisone were randomized to receive either IFX or placebo in addition to prednisone. Response status and immunoglobulin (Ig) G anti-desmoglein (Dsg)1 and Dsg3 antibodies were assessed at 18 and 26 weeks.Ten subjects were randomized to each group. There were no safety signals during the course of the study. At week 18, one subject in each group had responded. At week 26, three IFX-treated subjects vs. none in the placebo group had responded (P = 0·21). At weeks 18 and 26, the median IgG anti-Dsg1 and anti-Dsg3 levels were lower in the IFX-treated patients [IgG anti-Dsg-1 (week 18, P = 0·035; week 26, P = 0·022); IgG anti-Dsg3 (week 18, P = 0·035; week, 26 P = 0·05)].This study is limited by the relatively small sample size. There was no significant difference between study arms in the proportion of subjects with treatment-related adverse eventsgrade 3. IFX therapy was not shown to be effective for the treatment of patients with PV in this randomized, placebo-controlled trial, although IFX treatment may be associated with a decrease in anti-Dsg1 and Dsg3 antibodies.

Summary Background Cutaneous dermatomyositis (DM) disease activity is associated with decreased quality of life. Objectives To assess if an improvement in quality of life, as measured by the Skindex-29 and patient-reported itch and pain on a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS), correlated with an improvement in cutaneous DM disease activity. Methods Patients with a completed cutaneous DM disease area and severity index [Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI)] at two visits separated by at least 2 months were classified into responder (n = 15) and nonresponder (n = 30) groups according to the point change in the CDASI activity scores between visits. Responders had at least a four-point improvement in CDASI activity, indicating clinically relevant improvement. Results The change from baseline to the follow-up visit of the Skindex-29 subscale scores for the responders vs. the nonresponders were significantly different for emotions (P