Search

INTRODUCTION Periostin is a matricellular protein expressed by many tissues. Its release may be enhanced, among others, through mechanical stimulation of muscles and bones as well as by cytokines of allergic inflammation. OBJECTIVES Our aim was to assess periostin levels in serum and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) of professional athletes, asthmatics and healthy controls. We also sought to determine whether acute treadmill exercise influences serum and EBC periostin. METHODS Study groups included 9 competitive swimmers, 10 mild-to-moderate asthmatics and 7 healthy controls. Athletes were assessed twice (in- and off-training period) while asthmatics and controls in one time-point. Data on demographics, allergy symptoms and exercise load were acquired through Allergy Questionnaire for Athletes (AQUA) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Serum and EBC were collected before and after treadmill exercise challenge. RESULTS Baseline serum periostin in swimmers during training period was significantly higher (5- to 7-fold) than in asthmatics (P = .01) and controls (P < .05). In EBC, lowest periostin levels were seen in athletes in-training as compared with off-training period (P < .01) and with asthmatics (P < .03). Acute bout of exercise did not induce significant changes neither in serum nor in EBC periostin in any group. CONCLUSION Increased serum, but not EBC, periostin levels in competitive athletes are probably because of permanently increased exercise load leading to stimulation, injury and regeneration of musculoskeletal tissues. Periostin may be considered marker of long-term exercise overload after confirmation in larger groups.

Introduction Exercise-induced respiratory symptoms are often reported by professional athletes, but asthma and allergy are underdiagnosed. Few studies used standardized questionnaires combined with clinical assessment to investigate asthma and allergy among athletes. Objectives Assessment of the prevalence of allergy and asthma symptoms among Polish professional athletes and confronting it with clinical data. Methods Two hundred twenty-two Olympic athletes participated in the project being part of the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA2LEN) Olympic study. Allergy and asthma status was determined using Allergy Questionnaire for Athletes (AQUA), spirometry, reversibility test, methacholine challenge and skin prick testing. Final diagnosis was established by an allergist. Results At least one exercise-induced asthma (EIA) symptom was reported by 28.4% athletes, and finally asthma diagnosis was established in 11.3% while only 5.9% of athletes had history of asthma. Reversibility test was positive in 36% of athletes finally diagnosed with asthma. Allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms were reported by 27%, and the diagnosis was confirmed in 21% of athletes while only 9% had previously diagnosed AR. No significant differences in frequency of asthma and AR were observed between endurance and non-endurance athletes. Conclusions High prevalence of exercise-induced respiratory symptoms among top athletes is not reflected by asthma diagnosis. As it was expected, our data confirm that – in diagnosis of EIA – lung function testing alone is not useful, whereas reversibility tests are of limited value.

Exercise-induced respiratory symptoms are often reported by professional athletes, but asthma and allergy are underdiagnosed. Few studies used standardized questionnaires combined with clinical assessment to investigate asthma and allergy among athletes.Assessment of the prevalence of allergy and asthma symptoms among Polish professional athletes and confronting it with clinical data.Two hundred twenty-two Olympic athletes participated in the project being part of the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2) LEN) Olympic study. Allergy and asthma status was determined using Allergy Questionnaire for Athletes (AQUA), spirometry, reversibility test, methacholine challenge and skin prick testing. Final diagnosis was established by an allergist.At least one exercise-induced asthma (EIA) symptom was reported by 28.4% athletes, and finally asthma diagnosis was established in 11.3% while only 5.9% of athletes had history of asthma. Reversibility test was positive in 36% of athletes finally diagnosed with asthma. Allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms were reported by 27%, and the diagnosis was confirmed in 21% of athletes while only 9% had previously diagnosed AR. No significant differences in frequency of asthma and AR were observed between endurance and non-endurance athletes.High prevalence of exercise-induced respiratory symptoms among top athletes is not reflected by asthma diagnosis. As it was expected, our data confirm that - in diagnosis of EIA - lung function testing alone is not useful, whereas reversibility tests are of limited value.