Search

Health care delivery is broken. The cost of care continues to skyrocket and the outcomes most important to patients are often a mystery. Further, care is often delivered via a fee-for-service model where surgeons are rewarded for the quantity, not the quality, of services provided. Such a health care delivery system is not sustainable and does not incentivize stakeholders to focus on the most important element of the health care delivery "puzzle": the patient. Fortunately, we are in the midst of transforming our health care delivery system, with a focus on optimizing the value of care delivery (ie, health outcomes achieved per dollar spent across a full care cycle). In hand surgery, progress has been made as part of this health system evolution. However, there remains much to accomplish. In this article, the authors review the 6 components of a strategic agenda for moving to a high-value health care delivery system for hand surgery, focusing on where we are today and where we need to go from here.

Purpose We sought to determine whether subjective clinical improvement immediately after carpal tunnel release (CTR) was captured by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE), Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression. Methods Between September 2018 and January 2020, patients presenting to a single academic medical center hand clinic were asked to complete PROMIS UE, PF, PI, and Depression computer adaptive tests. In addition, patients who had CTR were asked to answer the following at their first postoperative clinic visit: “Since my last clinic visit, my condition is: (1) much better; (2) mildly better; (3) no change; (4) mildly worse; (5) much worse.” For each patient, the last clinic visit was the final preoperative visit. The PROMIS domain scores were compared before and after surgery using paired t tests. The percentage of patients subjectively reporting better symptoms was calculated. Results A total of 156 patients fit our inclusion criteria. The average number of days between the final preoperative visit and CTR was 7 (range, 0–30), and the average number of days between CTR and the first postoperative visit was 9 (range, 3–21). A total of 116 patients (74%) reported their carpal tunnel syndrome was better at their first postoperative visit. However, PROMIS UE, PF, and PI scores were significantly worse at the first postoperative visit, although not at clinically appreciable levels. There was no statistical or clinical difference in PROMIS Depression scores from pre- to postoperative time points. Conclusions Nearly 75% of patients subjectively report their carpal tunnel syndrome is better at their first follow-up visit within 3 weeks of CTR; however, PROMIS does not capture this improvement. Clinical relevance Hand surgeons evaluating patients shortly following CTR should be aware of the potential limitation of PROMIS to accurately capture immediate postoperative clinical outcomes. Disease-specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures, such as the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire , may be preferred during this immediate postoperative timeframe.

Purpose The thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is the second most common site of osteoarthritis in the hand, yet reported symptoms and ultimate treatment decisions are not simply a function of radiographic appearance. This study aimed to determine the patient- and/or disease-related factors associated with patients undergoing surgical treatment of thumb CMC arthritis. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed 1,994 patients with thumb CMC arthritis treated at 2 institutions between February 2015 and November 2018. Patient demographic and clinical information was obtained from medical records to characterize treatment modalities before hand surgeon evaluation, mental and physical comorbidities, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System assessments. After bivariate analysis , a multivariable logistic regression model evaluated factors associated with undergoing thumb CMC surgery. Results This cohort was predominately female (70%) and white (91%), mean age at first appointment, 62 ± 10 years. A total of 170 patients underwent surgery for thumb CMC arthritis (9%) at a median of 114 days (interquartile range, 27–328) after the first visit. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Depression scores correlated with Pain Interference and Physical Function scores. A history of diagnosed depression or anxiety was associated with less perceived Physical Function at presentation. However, only prior contralateral thumb CMC surgery, younger patient age, and treating institution were associated with undergoing surgery in regression modeling. Conclusions Pain and functional limitations associated with thumb CMC arthritis are influenced by mental health comorbidities, but these factors do not predict surgical treatment. Instead, patients’ prior surgical experience and surgeon attitudes toward thumb CMC arthritis appear to have a strong influence on the odds of patients undergoing surgery for thumb CMC arthritis. Type of study/level of evidence Prognostic IV.

The global burden of musculoskeletal trauma is high. There is a need to improve access to safe, high-quality surgery in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Numerous initiatives have taken aim at solving this underlying shortage in surgical care, including mission trips, academic programs, and international collaborations. However, much work remains to be done in LMICs compared with high-income countries (HICs). In HICs, the field of hand surgery has grown partially owing to the rigorous application of clinical research to examine outcomes and determine best practices. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have a key role as a valid patient-centered method of capturing symptoms and well-being. They have substantial promise in LMICs to understand patient symptom severity and quality of life better, monitor treatment success or failure, determine cost-effectiveness of procedures, and guide capacity building. Contextually appropriate PROMs can improve routine follow-up in LMICs and advance the practice and study of hand surgery worldwide.

Purpose Prior studies evaluated the impact of insurance type on access to hand care. However, there is limited literature quantifying whether patient symptoms are worse at the time of intervention. Our primary null hypothesis was that insurance type would not be associated with Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure Information System (PROMIS) Upper-Extremity (UE), Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression scores at the preoperative visit before carpal tunnel release (CTR). Methods Between December 2016 and November 2018, patients with known carpal tunnel syndrome presenting to a tertiary academic hand clinic for the preoperative visit within 3 months of CTR, completed PROMIS UE, PF, PI, and Depression computer adaptive tests. Patient characteristics were recorded, including insurance type as commercial, Medicare, Medicaid, or workers’ compensation. Multivariable linear regression was used to determine which variables were associated with PROMIS scores at the preoperative visit before CTR. Results A total of 301 patients were included in the analysis. All PROMIS domains were significantly different by insurance type; Medicaid patients had the worst preoperative score for all domains in bivariate analysis . In multivariable linear regression modeling, commercial insurance was associated with better preoperative PROMIS UE, PF, PI, and Depression scores. Conclusions Commercial insurance is associated with significantly better preoperative PROMIS PF, PI, and Depression scores compared with other insurance types (ie, Medicaid, Medicare, and Workers’ compensation). This may be the result of a number of factors, including differences in access to hand care or life circumstances that allow for only certain individuals to seek hand care early on in the disease process. However, further research is warranted to determine more definitively why this association exists. Type of study/level of evidence Prognostic II.

Purpose Uncertainty exists about what change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores represents a clinically relevant improvement (minimal clinically important difference [MCID]) in hand surgery care. Using a region-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) (Michigan Hand Question [MHQ]) and a condition-specific PROM (Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire [BCTQ]), MCID values were determined for PROMIS Physical Function (PF), Upper Extremity (UE), and Pain Interference (PI) computerized adaptive testing among patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR). Methods Patients undergoing CTR with a single surgeon from November 2014 to April 2017 were asked to complete the BCTQ, MHQ, and PROMIS PF, UE, and PI at each visit. Patients who had completed questionnaires both at a preoperative and either a 6-week or a 3-month postoperative visit were included. The PROMIS PF, UE, and PI MCID values were calculated using previously determined MCID estimates in the literature with both region- (ie, MHQ) and condition-specific (ie, BCTQ) PROM anchors. The PROMIS domain MCID estimates were also determined using the distribution-based method. Results A total of 70 patients fit our inclusion criteria. Using MHQ Function and Pain, PROMIS UE, PF, and PI MCIDs were 6.3, 1.8, and –8.9, respectively. Using the average of the 2 BCTQ domains, PROMIS UE, PF, and PI MCIDs were 8.0, 2.8, and –9.7, respectively. Using the distribution-based method, PROMIS UE, PF, and PI MCIDs were 4.2, 2.7, and –4.1, respectively. Conclusions Using region- and condition-specific PROMs, we were able to provide MCID estimates of PROMIS UE, PF, and PI for patients undergoing CTR. Clinical relevance Estimating PROMIS UE, PF, and PI MCIDs in CTR using validated region- and condition-specific PROMs provides hand surgeons a way to evaluate CTR outcomes not previously described in the literature. Surgeons should understand that these values are only estimates and future work is needed to verify whether they reflect clinical improvement.

Purpose This study aimed to (1) determine the correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) with PROMIS Upper Extremity (UE) and compare the correlations of PF and UE with PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) and PROMIS Depression; (2) compare the ability of PF and UE to capture health outcomes across the spectrum in patients seeking hand care; and (3) compare the time to completion for PROMIS PF to that for PROMIS UE. Methods Patients presenting to a hand clinic between October, 2015 and October, 2017 were asked to complete PROMIS PF, UE, PI, and Depression computerized adaptive tests. Spearman correlation coefficients (ρ) were calculated between the domains. Ceiling and floor effects and time to completion of each domain were compared. Results A total of 20,489 unique visits representing 10,344 patients met inclusion criteria. On average, PROMIS UE demonstrated more functional disability than did PROMIS PF (PF: 43.9 [95% confidence interval (CI), 43.7–44.0] vs UE: 38.5 [95% CI, 38.4–38.7]). PROMIS PF and UE were positively correlated (ρ = 0.79) and both were inversely correlated with PROMIS PI (PF: ρ = –0.72; UE: ρ = –0.72). PROMIS PF and UE were both inversely correlated with PROMIS Depression (PF: ρ = –0.44; UE: ρ = –0.44). PROMIS PF demonstrated better ceiling (0.6% vs 7.5%) and floor effects (0.07% vs 0.4%). The PROMIS UE CAT was completed in about the same time as the PROMIS PF CAT (UE: 59.8 seconds [95% CI, 59.3–60.3 seconds] vs PF: 54.1 seconds [95% CI, 53.8–54.5 seconds]). Conclusions PROMIS PF captures functional outcomes similar to those of the UE domain with better performance (ie, ceiling and floor effects) in patients with hand pathologies. Clinical relevance Hand surgeons should consider the trade-off of using PROMIS PF instead of PROMIS UE or vice versa when selecting a domain for patient care. Although PROMIS PF may capture slight variations in function at the extremes better than the current PROMIS UE, this may not be as clinically important as capturing large changes in upper-extremity function more specifically, which PROMIS UE accomplishes.

Purpose Surgery for nontraumatic upper-extremity problems is largely discretionary and preference-sensitive. Psychological and social determinants of health correlate with greater symptoms and limitations and might be associated with discretionary operative treatment. Methods We used routinely collected patient-reported outcome measures from patients with de Quervain tendinopathy , ganglion cyst , trapeziometacarpal arthritis, trigger digit, and carpal tunnel syndrome to study factors associated with discretionary surgery using multiple logistic regression . Patients completed a measure of the magnitude of physical limitations (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test [CAT]), a measure of the degree to which a person limits activities owing to pain (PROMIS Pain Interference CAT), and a measure of symptoms of depression (PROMIS Depression CAT) at every office visit. Results Higher PROMIS Pain Interference score, diagnoses of carpal tunnel syndrome, and treatment by teams 3, 4, or 5 were independently associated with discretionary operative treatment. Conclusions People with a greater tendency to limit activity owing to pain are more likely to choose discretionary surgery. Clinical relevance Interventions that help people remain active despite pain by addressing the psychological and social determinants of health might affect the rate of discretionary surgery.