Search

The role of regulatory CD4+Foxp3+ T cells (Treg) suppressor function within allografts in tolerance remain unclear. To directly address this, we first used a model where immune reactions are restrained to the graft only. Effector T cells (Teff) alone, or with Treg (2–3×106 each) were transferred to B6 mice lacking secondary lymphoid organs (SLO−; splenectomized LTβR−/−) 5 days after islet allograft (Balb/c). Adoptive transfer of Teff alone induced acute rejection (10d MST). In contrast, Teff + Treg co-transfers significantly prolonged graft survival, with 65% of recipients surviving long-term (>100d MST). Interestingly, Treg did not affect Teff proliferation or accumulation within allografts, but significantly reduced MHC-II expression on DCs and IFN-γ in Teff. Secondly, given that S1PR1 signaling is necessary for lymphocyte exit from SLO, we prevented Treg migration to allografts during tolerance by removing S1PR1 expression in endogenous Treg specifically. Tamoxifen-fed B6.Foxp3EGFP-Cre/Ert2.S1PR1fl/fl (S1PR1KO-Treg) or B6.S1PR1fl/fl (WT-Treg) mice received Balb/c islets. Untreated mice rejected allografts acutely (18d MST). Interestingly, while anti-CD45RB treatment induced tolerance in WT-Treg control mice (95d MST), all S1PR1KO-Treg mice rejected their graft (28d MST; p Overall, our data demonstrate that Treg can suppress rejection by Teff within allografts without prior activation in SLO, and suggest that Treg suppressor function within allografts is required for tolerance.

Recent convincing data have shown that naturally occurring CD8+CD122+ T cells are also regulatory T cells. Paradoxically, CD8+CD122+ T cells have been well described as memory T cells. Given their critical role in tolerance versus long-term immunity, it is important to reconcile this profound dichotomy. In this study, we reported that CD8+CD122+ T cells contain both programmed death-1 (PD-1)− and PD-1+ populations. It was CD8+CD122+PD-1+ T cells, but not their PD-1− counterparts, that suppressed T cell responses in vitro and in vivo. This suppression was largely dependent on their production of IL-10. Moreover, the costimulatory signaling of both CD28 and PD-1 is required for their optimal IL-10 production. In contrast, Ag-specific CD8+CD122+PD-1− T cells were bona fide memory T cells. Thus, CD8+CD122+ T cells can be either regulatory T or memory T cells, depending on their PD-1 expression and Ag specificity. This study reconciles previously contradictory findings and has important implications for tolerance induction.

Memory T cells are resistant to the conventional costimulatory blockade and therefore impede tolerance induction. However, their migratory, survival, and functional requirements for chemokines are not well understood. We herein examine the role for MCP-1 or CCL2 in the generation, migration, and function of memory CD8+ T cells. We found that overall generation of both central memory (TCM) and effector memory (TEM) CD8+ T cells was severely impaired in the absence of MCP-1. Importantly, the survival of TEM, but not TCM, CD8+ cells was reduced without MCP-1, whereas the homeostatic proliferation of TCM, but not TEM, CD8+ cells was weakened in MCP-1−/− mice. However, once they were generated in the absence of MCP-1, in vitro function of both subsets of memory cells remained intact as determined by their proliferation and IFN-γ production. Interestingly, the migration of TCM, but not TEM, CD8+ cells to inflammatory sites was significantly delayed without MCP-1, whereas both subsets of memory cells underwent comparable expansion and apoptosis with or without MCP-1 during the effector phase. Moreover, the function to eliminate a graft of TCM, but not TEM, CD8+ cells was impaired without MCP-1. Thus, this study demonstrates that MCP-1 plays an important role in not only migration but also generation and survival of memory T cells. This finding provides new insight into the requirement of chemokines for the generation, survival, and function of differential subsets of memory T cells and may have clinic implications for tolerance induction.

Memory T cells respond faster and more vigorously than their naive counterparts and are critical for adaptive immunity. However, it is unknown whether and how memory T cells react in the face of irrelevant Ags. It is generally accepted that bystander memory T cells are neutral in immune responsiveness. In this study, we present the first evidence that bystander central memory (TCM), but not effector memory (TEM), CD8+ T cells suppress allograft rejection as well as T cell proliferation in the draining lymph nodes (DLN) of recipient mice. Both bystander TCM and naive T cells, but fewer TEM cells, migrated to DLN, whereas TCM cells exhibited faster turnover than their naive counterparts, suggesting that bystander TCM cells have an advantage over their naive counterparts in suppression. However, bystander TEM cells migrated to inflammatory graft sites, but not DLN, and yet failed to exert their suppression. These findings indicate that bystander memory T cells need to migrate to lymph nodes to exert their suppression by inhibiting responder T cell activation or homeostatic proliferation. Moreover, the suppression mediated by bystander TCM cells was largely dependent on IL-15, as IL-15 was required for their homeostatic proliferation and TCM-mediated suppression of allograft rejection. This suppression also required the presence of TGFβ1, as TCM cells expressed TGFβ1 while neutralizing TGFβ1 abolished their suppression. Thus, bystander TCM, but not TEM, CD8+ T cells are potent suppressors rather than bystanders. This new finding will have an impact on cellular immunology and may have clinic implications for tolerance induction.

Host effector T cell graft infiltration is a key step in the pathogenesis of both acute and chronic rejection. Recent data indicate effector T cell migration into primary vascularized organ transplants such as heart and kidney is driven by donor antigen recognition, not via Gai-coupled chemokine receptor signaling. Whether it is true for neovascularized pancreatic islet allografts is unknown. We co-transferred pertussis toxin (Ptx)-treated and untreated TCR-tg (OT-1) effector T cells into B6 recipients 7-10 days after transplanting B6-Act-OVA or B6 islet grafts under the kidney capsule. Ptx irreversibly blocks Gai-dependent signaling. Grafts were imaged 20-24 hours after T cell transfer by two-photon intravital microscopy. We observed B6-Act-OVA grafts were heavily infiltrated with OT-1 effector T cells irrespective of pre-treatment with Ptx or not (453.7+/-170.0 vs. 632.8+/-221.1 per imaging volume, n = 10, p = 0.0522 ), while B6 grafts, which lack the cognate antigen recognized by OT-1 T cells, were free of infiltrate (